Edge Effects: Habitat Biodiversity and Human Interference

More than just a margin, the edge provides a crucial home for flora and fauna.

Elevated view of flowering plants and shrubs on a slope, two kayakers on a narrow river and grassland.

Mint Images / Getty Images

Edge effects are the changes in biodiversity that occur inside the space surrounding the shared edge of two or more distinct ecosystems. This transitional zone rich in biodiversity is known as the ecotone; examples are between woodlands and plains, forests and mountains, and land and water. Informally known as the edge, the ecotone affects the plants and animals living there in a way that is unique from the connecting habitats.

In larger habitats, there is a smaller percentage of area affected by the edge. This allows flora and fauna to thrive in both ecosystems and along the edge. But in smaller habitats, it is more likely for conditions from the edge to threaten the stability of individual biomes—making it difficult, if not impossible, for many plants and animals to survive. Here, we review some examples of positive and negative edge effects.

Did You Know?

No matter how big or small the ecosystem, the size of the edge remains constant. Unlike some habitats that thrive with expansion, the edge does not become more robust with increased size, and the effects can be devastating if it expands beyond what the surrounding habitats can support.

Positive Edge Effects

Aerial view of estuary.
An estuary where fresh and saltwater meet alongside a coastline. ollo / Getty Images

When two adjacent habitats have enough individual space to allow for an ample gradient edge, the ecotone is uniquely positioned to provide habitable conditions for certain plants and animals. Thriving edges house the greatest variety of natural structures, ranging from small to tall, and they often boast wildlife populations exceeding any bordering habitats. 

Changes to the landscape, including geographic features, soil types, temperatures, and humidity levels, are called inherent edges.

What Are Inherent Edges?

Inherent edges are naturally occurring changes that are generally considered wide; they provide adequate space for species in and outside the ecotone to prosper. If left untouched by humans, inherent edges tend to remain stable in size and population over long periods.

Unlike the interiors of most ecosystems, edges receive more sunlight, experience less humidity, face more wind, and experience higher temperatures. These environmental differences enable a more hospitable environment for high light, drought-tolerant flora. Consequently, more herbivorous insects, birds, and other animals can make their homes inside the ecotone.

Some fauna, including rabbits, deer, and elk, require multiple environments and rely on the edge as a space for foraging and nesting. (Or, in the case of the dung beetle, waste removal). Humans, as animals inhabiting the natural world, benefit from the edge effect because a healthy, wide ecotone physically separates people from predators.

Negative Edge Effects

When people infringe upon the natural world, ecological edges sharpen, and the biodiversity of the ecotone diminishes. Narrow, human-induced edges can increase the risk for infectious diseases, degrade soil quality, and decrease humidity levels.

What Are Induced Edges?

Induced edges are human-made disturbances to the natural environment resulting in abrupt changes to habitat borders. These edges do not remain stable for even short periods and are described as narrow—not because they take up less width but because the transition between environments is so sudden.

Urbanization, lumber harvesting, and food cultivation all result in induced edges. They can also have biological or climate origins: Floods, fires, winds, disease, and insect infestations can all create edges. Once these negative edge effects take hold, the climate along the edge can spread deeper into the environment, threatening habitat destruction for a number of species that can only survive in the original biomes. 

Consider how different an edge defined by commercial deforestation looks compared to the gentle transition from woodland to clearing. Higher winds along these anthropogenic edges often feed and exacerbate wildfires, causing further damage. Sufficient destruction to the forest edge can cause fragmentation, which creates more edges around increasingly smaller ecosystems.

Predators, pushed out of their habitats, venture out into the edge and beyond, affecting bird and, by extension, insect populations. Since the size of the edge remains constant, the already more plentiful edge plants and animals can grow in population, creating a subsequent environmental problem: invasive species.


From a planetary perspective, humans dominate the landscape. Agriculture alone takes up nearly 40% of all land on Earth. The negative edge effects associated with field clearing for crop growth matter not just because of deforestation concerns. Moreover, herbicides, fertilizers, and other chemicals used in food and animal production can leach out of these narrow boundaries and contaminate the surrounding natural habitats.

As the human population continues to grow, experts believe that global demands for dairy and meat will drive future land use changes, requiring even more space to grow food for humans and animals. Without sustainable natural habitats inside the edge, ranching can also force livestock to compete with native species for food supplies. 


High Angle View Of Road Crossing Urban River
The Los Angeles river is almost entirely encased in cement.

Marc Harris / EyeEm / Getty Images

Like agriculture, urbanization also threatens vital ecosystems around the world. More than half of humanity currently lives in an urban area, with over 70% of the global population predicted to live in cities by 2050. Urbanization can also create competition for natural resources and introduce new predators like domestic cats that can wreak havoc on wild bird populations.

The current state of the Los Angeles River provides a clear example of how urbanization can destroy an ecotone and injure the surrounding biological communities. What once provided a rich biome for plants, animals, and one of the largest groups of Native Americans in North America is now a 51-mile long concrete wash, with just 5% to 10% of its natural habitat still intact.

Not only have plants and animals disappeared from the river and along the anthropogenically-induced edge, but communities of color living nearby suffer some of the highest levels of poverty and pollution in all of Southern California—the consequences of environmental racism.

To create a just and sustainable future for all life on the planet, lawmakers need to work with scientists to develop specific and practical techniques to restore endangered ecosystems and maintain flourishing, biodiverse edges that connect humanity to nature.

Frequently Asked Questions
  • What is an example of edge effect?

    Imagine a river and the land on either side of it. The plants and animals inside the river are quite different from those on land, and between these two areas exists greater biodiversity than in either individual ecosystem. The unique geography of this transitional space between habitats allows for many plant and animal species to thrive, displaying a positive edge effect.

  • What causes an edge effect?

    The diversity of life within an ecotone is due to additional sunlight and drier conditions, both of which permit more plants and animals to thrive along the edge. However, the edge effect can become negative when agriculture or urbanization shrinks the connecting ecosystems, causing the edge to extend into wetter, more shaded conditions and driving habitat destruction.

  • What is the importance of edge effects?

    When ecosystems are healthy and sustainable, they can support thriving edges where an array of insects, birds, mammals, and plants can flourish. Without proper space to support the life in these connecting communities, the habitats themselves will shrink as the edges move ever closer to the center.

View Article Sources
  1. Potts, J.R., Hillen, T. & Lewis, M.A. "The 'edge effect' phenomenon: deriving population abundance patterns from individual animal movement decisions." Theor Ecol 9, 233–247 (2016). doi:10.1007/s12080-015-0283-7

  2. Carla Daniele De Carvalho Guimarães, João Paulo Rodrigues Viana, and Tatiana Cornelissen. "A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Fragmentation on Herbivorous Insects." Environmental Entomology, Volume 43, Issue 3, 1 June 2014, Pages 537–545. doi:10.1603/EN13190

  3. Sisk, Thomas D. and James Battin. Habitat Edges and Avian Ecology: Geographic Patterns and Insights for Western Landscapes. Studies in Avian Biology, No. 25, pp. 30-48, 2002.

  4. Clark, T. P., and F. F. Gilbert. “Ecotones as a Measure of Deer Habitat Quality in Central Ontario.” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 19, no. 3, 1982, pp. 751–58. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2403279

  5. Santos-Heredia, Carolina, Ellen Andresen, and Pablo Stevenson. "Secondary seed dispersal by dung beetles in an Amazonian forest fragment of Colombia: influence of dung type and edge effect." Integrative Zoology, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 399-408, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2011.00261.x

  6. Faust, Christina L, et al. "Null expectations for disease dynamics in shrinking habitat: dilution or amplification?" Royal Society, vol. 372, No. 1722, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0173

  7. Ruwanza, Sheunesu. "The Edge Effect on Plant Diversity and Soil Properties in Abandoned Fields Targeted for Ecological Restoration." Sustainability, vol. 11, 2018. doi:10.3390/su11010140

  8. Parkins, Kate, Alan York, and Julian Di Stefano. "Edge effects in fire-prone landscapes: Ecological importance and implications for fauna." Ecology and Evolution, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 5937-5948, 2018. doi:10.1002/ece3.4076

  9. Wade, Timothy G., et al. “Distribution and Causes of Global Forest Fragmentation.” Conservation Ecology, vol. 7, no. 2, 2003. JSTOR.

  10. Batáry, Péter, and András Báldi. "Evidence of an Edge Effect on Avian Nest Success." Conservation Biology, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 389-400, 2004. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00184.x

  11. Rand, Tatyana A., Jason M. Tylianakis, Teja Tscharntke. "Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats." Ecology Letters, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 603-614, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00911.x

  12. "Land use in agriculture by the numbers." Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2020.

  13. Prosser, Ryan S., et al. "Indirect effects of herbicides on biota in terrestrial edge-of-field habitats: A critical review of the literature." Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 232, pp. 59-72, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.009

  14. Alexander, Peter, et al. "Drivers for global agricultural land use change: The nexus of diet, population, yield and bioenergy." Global Environmental Change, vol. 35, pp. 138-147, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.011

  15. Magura, T., Lövei, G.L. "Consequences of Urban Living: Urbanization and Ground Beetles." Curr Landscape Ecol Rep 6, 9–21 (2021). doi:10.1007/s40823-020-00060-x

  16. Kiss, Gregory, et al. "The 2050 City." Procedia Engineering, vol. 118, pp. 326-355, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.434

  17. Tjallingii, Sybrand P. "Ecology on the edge: Landscape and ecology between town and country." Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 48, Nos. 3-4, pp. 103-119, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00035-9

  18. "LA River Ecosystem Restoration." Los Angeles River Revitalization. 2021.