Science Technology The Carbon Impact of Googling By Karl Burkart Writer Swarthmore College University of Oregon Karl Burkart is a writer, architect, digital strategist, and nonprofit executive focused on issues including climate change, biodiversity, clean energy, and sustainable agriculture. our editorial process Karl Burkart Updated December 26, 2019 Perhaps it's best to think before you search. (Photo: Thaspol Sangsee/Shutterstock) Share Twitter Pinterest Email Science Space Natural Science Technology Agriculture Energy The blogs are ablaze. That bastion of liberalness and social progress, Google, has been indicted with a carbon crime -- two google searches alone are responsible for the emission of 7g of CO2, "enough to boil a kettle of water." Google, a company that has invested millions in solar technology, promptly rebutted the claim, saying that a search represents a tiny fraction of that amount. But in typical Google fashion, they will not release the stats. So we are left to wonder. One of my favorite carbon bloggers in the UK, Leo Hickman, did some number crunching and is skeptical. He also points out that Alex Wissner-Gross, the man behind the 7g figure is the co-founder of CO2Stats.com, a company which sells carbon credits to internet companies to offset their carbon footprint. Little conflict of interest, no? If anything, Hickman states, CO2Stats.com should be congratulated for a fabulous PR campaign that raises an important fact -- information technology consumes a great deal of energy and is responsible for an estimated 2-3% of global carbon emissions. Here's the back of the envelope math: approximately 500 million google searches every day (estimates vary) x 3.5 g per search = 1.75 trillion grams / 1 million grams per ton = 1,750 tonnes per day x 365 = 638,000 CO2 tonnes per year And that's just for searching. It seems safe to assume that Google uses an equal portion of its servers for its hundreds of other projects -- phones, software, advertising services, webware, apps and on and on. So lets double that number to 1.3 million tonnes/year. That's more than many countries. But it is still certainly within the realm of reason. Alex Wissner-Gross has done the math on this. His numbers are based on energy consumption for a typical website -- 20 mg of CO2 per second. Google, with their sophisticated server network, claims to be significantly less. But one great thing about this factoid, accurate or not, is that it makes us think about how many of our impacts on the environment remain totally invisible to us. A new division of cleantech has recently emerged, called "Green IT," to address the growing energy demands of internet and IT infrastructure. Many new technological advances are being made that can save up to 80% on server loads. In the meantime though, I encourage everyone to use Blackle an all-black, energy saving version of Google. The creators theorize that an all black version of Google would save 750,000 kWh's of energy per year.