Science Natural Science 6 Problems Caused by Shrinking Biodiversity By David DeFranza Updated October 6, 2020 Fact checked by Betsy Petrick Fact checked by Betsy Petrick Ohio Wesleyan University Brandeis University Northeastern University Betsy Petrick is an experienced researcher, writer, and producer. Learn about our fact checking process Share Twitter Pinterest Email Treehugger / Christian Yonkers Science Space Natural Science Technology Agriculture Energy Estimates of species loss are, without a doubt, staggering. In 2007, Sigmar Gabriel, the then-Federal Minister for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety of Germany, cited estimates that up to 30% of all species will be extinct by 2050 if climate change continues to progress as it has been. Others have estimated that as many as 140,000 species are lost each year. The alarming trends have led some to declare the current period the "Sixth Mass Extinction." But, extinctions—even mass extinction events—are not new. Though the current trend is caused, undeniably, by human action—through poaching, habitat destruction, pollution, and anthropogenic climate change, among others—mass reductions in biodiversity can and have occurred without human interference. The question then, is what does humanity lose when global biodiversity is significantly reduced? Simply: a lot. Here are six significant human problems caused by reduced biodiversity. 1. Economic Cost of Lost Biodiversity Treehugger / Christian Yonkers Topping the list, of course, is the monetary value of biodiversity around the world. In terms of ecosystem services—functions like pollination, irrigation, soil reclamation, and other things that would have to be paid for if nature couldn't take care of it on its own—the value of global biodiversity has been estimated in the trillions. Because of this, deforestation alone has been estimated to cost between $2-5 trillion annually worldwide. 2. Reduced Food Security Treehugger / Christian Yonkers Reductions in biodiversity do not only occur during deforestation or through poaching. The introduction of new species is another culprit. These new species increase competition amongst locals and often lead to the extinction of native populations. In much of the world, this is happening on farms, too, where foreign breeds of cattle are being imported, pushing out natives. This means that the world's livestock population is becoming increasingly narrow and more vulnerable to disease, drought, and changes in climate, leading to an overall reduction in food security. 3. Increased Contact With Disease Treehugger / Christian Yonkers The loss of biodiversity has two significant impacts on human health and the spread of disease. First, it increases the number of disease-carrying animals in local populations. Research has shown that the species best adapted to survive critically fragmented habitats are also the most prolific carriers of pathogens. As habitats are broken apart and reduced in size, these animals become more common, winning out over the species that do not typically transmit disease. At the same time, habitat fragmentation brings humans in closer and more frequent contact with these disease-carrying species. 4. More Unpredictable Weather Treehugger / Christian Yonkers If forecasting the weather seems simply a matter of deciding to bring an umbrella or not, ask any farmer or coastal homeowner how they feel. Indeed, unseasonable weather, extreme weather, and weather that does not perform to historical norms is a huge problem that can lead to drought, destruction, and displacement. The loss of species—even those replaced by invasives—has been shown to cause more unpredictable weather. 5. Loss of Livelihoods Treehugger / Christian Yonkers From fishermen to farmers, biodiversity—not to mention healthy ecosystems—is essential to maintaining livelihoods. When ocean ecosystems collapse, for example, entire communities built on the bounty they provide fold as well. Whether the cause is pollution, overfishing, ocean acidification, or a combination of these and more, humans are tied to the downfall of the ecosystems that surround them. 6. Losing Sight of "Nature" Treehugger / Christian Yonkers Beyond the utility of nature, of course, is the value of Nature to humanity. While an understanding of the science of the natural world does not diminish its grandeur, the physical deflation of it certainly does. When people finally look up from their desks and out their windows, will they be surprised by what remains? View Article Sources Frezina, N., et al. “Extinction of Species and its Management for Ecological Balance.” Journal of Educational and Social Research, vol. 2, 2012, pp. 159-163., doi:10.5901/jesr.2012.v2n9p159 Ceballos, Gerardo, et al. “Biological Annihilation Via the Ongoing Sixth Mass Extinction Signaled by Vertebrate Population Losses and Declines.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, vol. 114, 2017, pp. E6089-E6096., doi:10.1073/pnas.1704949114 Berry, Pam, et al. The Vulnerability of Threatened Species: Adaptive Capability and Adaptation Opportunity. Biology (Basel), vol. 2, 2013, pp. 872-93., doi:10.3390/biology2030872 “The Cost of Policy Inaction.” The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Project. Keesing, Felicia, et al. Impacts of Biodiversity on the Emergence and Transmission of Infectious Diseases. Nature, vol. 468, 2010, pp. 647-52. doi:10.1038/nature09575 “The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Patil, Rajan R., et al. “Biodiversity Loss: Public Health Risk of Disease Spread and Epidemics.” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 10, 2017, pp. 1432-1438., doi:10.4103/ATMPH.ATMPH_269_16 Faust, Christina L., et al. “Null expectations for disease dynamics in shrinking habitat: dilution or amplification?.” Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2017, vol. 372, doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0173 Seebens H., et al. "No Saturation in the Accumulation of Alien Species Worldwide." Nat Commun, vol. 8, 2017, doi:10.1038/ncomms14435