Nutria: What You Should Know About the Invasive Rodent

Nutria Myocastor coypus
delectus / Getty Images

Nutria are large, semi-aquatic rodents native to South America with coarse brown fur, webbed feet, and a pair of long front teeth with orange tips.

Larger than muskrats and smaller than beavers, two native mammals that share similar habitats, nutria first found their way to the United States around the turn of the 20th century as part of the fur trade. After numerous escapes, nutria established rapidly growing populations in the Gulf Coast and elsewhere around the U.S.

The nutria's prolific eating habits have a dramatic and detrimental effect on the non-native habitats it now populates, particularly threatened wetlands and marshes. Today, nutria are considered an invasive species in the United States.

How Nutria Became an Invasive Species

Nutria were first introduced in the United States in California in 1899, when the fur trade was booming but populations of native fur-bearing animals were beginning to decrease. Nutria provided a new source of revenue for trappers in rural parts of Louisiana, Texas, Maryland, and California.

The nutria's appeal to the fur industry was its beaver-like fur: a coarse, waterproof, outer layer and a shorter, soft inner layer for warmth. By the 1930s, the nutria was in seven states.

Like many non-native species imported because of economic value, the nutria eventually escaped. In Louisiana, for example, Tabasco founder E. A. McIlhenny lost at least 150 animals from his coastal lands following a 1940 hurricane.

McIlhenny thought the rodents would be eaten by alligators. However, the animals survived, rapidly expanding in population across the region. They also likely bred with other nutria that trappers had intentionally released to create a local population.

By the 1950s, nutria were damaging rice and sugarcane fields across south Louisiana. The state began paying trappers $0.25 per nutria pelt in an attempt to minimize their impact. This bounty stopped in the 1960s when nutria fur exports to Europe boomed.

But by the end of the 1980s, fur was losing its status as a prized commodity. Nutria populations were again ballooning across marshes in Louisiana, as well as in Maryland. Both states instituted control programs to try and stop the nutria's damage.

The animal has since been eradicated from many of Maryland's vulnerable marsh areas. Millions remain in Louisiana despite more than 2.5 million being harvested since the state's bounty program began again in 2002.

Problems Caused by Nutria

Nutria are opportunistic feeders. They have a broad diet comprised of more than 60 plant species found in Louisiana alone.

The rodents are attracted to wetlands that contain a reliable source of nutrient-rich freshwater. They can consume large amounts of marsh biomass and in certain cases can cause the collapse of marsh locally.

Scientific studies investigating the effects of nutria on marsh habitats consistently conclude that nutria grazing is damaging to marsh and young forest vegetation. Nutria also damage bald cypress and water tupelo forests, preventing them from regenerating by eating seedlings.

Ragondin (Myocastor coypu) gnawing tree, Ile de France, France
Gerard Soury / Getty Images

Because nutria breed prolifically and consume several pounds of vegetation per day, this damage happens quickly.

In the early 2000s, researchers with Louisiana's Department of Wildlife and Fisheries estimated that nutria were damaging around 100,000 acres of wetlands per year. Following the institution of their bounty program in 2002, in which around 400,000 nutria per year are harvested, that damage is currently estimated at around 15,000 acres.

Scientists were concerned that this many dead nutria might harm other native populations, namely the alligator. However, researchers found that the probability of an alligator stomach containing nutria in five south Louisiana parishes did not change regardless of whether or not nutria were being harvested nearby.

Many marshes invaded by nutria are prized for their ecological importance, like the Chesapeake Bay in eastern Maryland. Internationally recognized as valuable wetlands, these areas are not only important for fishing and hunting, as ecotourism increasingly plays an economic role.

Lawmakers and advocates have long raised the alarm that marsh destruction as a result of the nutria will inevitably impact the hundreds of species of plants and animals native to these areas. They argue that this will lead to significant ecological, cultural, and economic losses.

Nutria feeding behavior destroys the root mat that cements the marsh together. After this network of fibers has been damaged, these areas are highly susceptible to erosion and can become muddy flats. Eventually, they may become open water, which will not support the majority of the species that typically thrive in a marsh.

Of course, nutria are not the sole source of coastal land loss. The climate crisis will only exacerbate the types of damage nutria cause, as sea levels rise and these habitats are minimized.

Efforts to Curb Environmental Damage

Perhaps the most successful effort at curbing a local nutria population to date has been in Maryland. The state's nutria control program successfully removed all of the known nutria from over a quarter million acres of the Delmarva Peninsula as well as the Chesapeake Bay. These efforts are considered "restoration through eradication" and are backed up with evidence showing that less nutria in an area means less marsh damage.

Nutria or Coypu, Myocastor coypus, in swamp, Louisiana, USA. Introduced from South America
John Cancalosi / Getty Images

Louisiana and Maryland both started nutria control programs in 2002. The two states' processes and results have been different.

In Louisiana, the private sector generally assumes the eradication effort, and trappers kill the nutria in exchange for a bounty of $6 per nutria. This program is meant to control the population and has effectively stopped its growth, though millions are believed to still live in the marshes.

In Maryland, the USDA and partners assumed the role of capturing and removing the nutria with a goal of complete removal, eventually eradicating the known population.

Similar efforts are underway in California to control growing nutria populations in certain areas.

For many environmentalists and sustainability-minded folks, control programs are a tough pill to swallow. There's a lot of waste involved in killing millions of fur-bearing, edible, creatures and subsequently burying or burning them.

Efforts at reviving the use of nutria meat and fur have been around for more than a decade in an effort to waste less. This approach would also potentially create a new market for nutria, providing economic incentives to reduce the population.

Chefs in New Orleans have posted recipes online, and a recently released film about nutria, Rodents of Unusual Size, highlights James Beard award winner Chef Susan Spicer as she prepares the rodent.

Another now-defunct New Orleans non-profit called Righteous Fur worked to connect trappers to local artists and designers. This initiative provided a use for nutria pelts and teeth (which can be used to make jewelry) that remained after trappers harvested the animal.

The potential downside to these ventures? If efforts at marketing nutria are too successful, people may become economically incentivized to farm the animal, starting the problem anew. Most people assume that won't happen, however, given the nutria's unsightly appearance and current lack of demand for fur in the United States.

Perhaps the most direct way to undo the nutria's damage is through marsh plantings, when volunteers replant grass and trees lost through nutria or boar damage, as well as coastal erosion.

People living near areas with nutria damage, particularly in south Louisiana, can reach out to local advocacy groups including the Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana to participate.

View Article Sources
  1. "Oversight Hearing on Pilot Program to Control Nutria at the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge in Maryland." House Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife, and Oceans, 1998.

  2. Sasser, Charles E. et al. "The Nutria in Louisiana: A Current and Historical Perspective." Mississippi Delta Restoration, 2017, pp. 39-60., doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65663-2_4

  3. "Damage." Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 2019.

  4. Gabrey, Steven W, et al. "Impacts of Nutria Removal on Food Habits of American Alligators in Louisiana." Southeastern Naturalist, vol. 8, no. 2, 2009, pp. 347-354, doi: 10.1656/058.008.0213

  5. Wade, Dale A., and Charles W. Ramsey. Identifying and Managing Aquatic Rodents in Texas: Beaver, Nutria, and Muskrats. No. 1556. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas A & M University System, 1986.

  6. Kendrot, S. R. "Restoration Through Eradication: Protecting Chesapeake Bay Marshlands from Invasive Nutria (Myocastor coypus)." Island Invasives: Eradication and Management, 2011.

  7. "Nutria Control Program." Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 2019.

  8. "Discovery of Invasive Nutria In California." California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

  9. Nuñez, Martin A., et al. "Invasive species: to eat or not to eat, that is the question." Conservation Letters 5.5, 2012, pp: 334-341, doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00250.x