US Forest Service returns to sensible fire management for 2013

Following a controversial decision in 2012 to launch an "aggressive initial attack” on all wildfires, however small, the US Forest Service spent $1.3 billion fighting fires, some $400 million over budget. OnEarth notes the return to progressive fire management for the 2013 season as good news for the taxpayers, firefighters and the environment:

This year, it appears the agency is moving back toward what ecologists and fire scientists have considered the best practices for almost 40 years now: fires that are sparked in remote wilderness, where they aren’t hurting anyone, should be allowed to burn. That’s because fire, as a natural part of the environment, is good for the ecosystem. Some essential animal and plant species actually thrive in fire-ravaged landscapes, and by thinning out excess timber and clearing out dry underbrush, small forest fires can help prevent large and deadlier blazes in the future.

More at OnEarth.

Related Content on