Debunking Myths About Prop 37

As of October 27, 2012, about $41.3 million had been donated to the "No on 37" campaign effort. The top five donors are Monsanto with $7,115,237, E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. with $4,900,000, Pepsico, Inc. with $2,145,400, DOW Agrisciences with $2,000,000, and Bayer Cropscience with $2,000,000.

What Opponents Want You to Think: Myth Busters Video

They’re working hard to scare consumers away from voting yes on the measure. Here’s a reminder of what Prop 37 will actually do:

-Require labeling on raw or processed food offered for sale to consumers if the food is made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways.
-Prohibit labeling or advertising such food as "natural."
-Exempt from this requirement foods that are "certified organic; unintentionally produced with genetically engineered material; made from animals fed or injected with genetically engineered material but not genetically engineered themselves; processed with or containing only small amounts of genetically engineered ingredients; administered for treatment of medical conditions; sold for immediate consumption such as in a restaurant; or alcoholic beverages."

Like this? Follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

Debunking Myths About Prop 37
Opponents of the Prop 37 want to scare you into voting against the bill. Read the truth.

Related Content on Treehugger.com