photo: Geert Orye
A recent post over at Chelsea Green by Gene Logsdon caught my eye this morning. After talking about Amish farming methods—which are far from beyond reproach in some areas, but that isn’t really the point of this post or Logsdon’s—he makes some interesting statements about the differences between farming with horses and with tractors. Now Logsdon grew up farming with horses, so this isn’t necessarily some piece of starry-eyed romanticism. He’s speaking from experience. Gene, forgive the longish excerpt:
I grew up when horses were still the rule in farming. I had a runaway with a team and a wagon when I was 11 years old, so I know the dark side of it too. Because of the strange circumstances of my life, I worked on horse-powered farms again in my early twenties. I assure you: farm work is no harder or easier using horses than tractors. Each has its pluses and minuses physically. Mentally, farming with horses is more relaxed (they always start in the morning no matter how cold) except during a runaway. The horse farmer I worked for during those years, (1950s) was by no means Amish. He did have a big old tractor to plow his hilly acres. He used horses because he made money farming with horses. He was the best economics professor I never had. The way he farmed wasn’t what you’d find in articles in the leading farm magazines; it wasn’t very pretty. But it was a lot prettier than the Americans lined up at the employment offices today because they opted out of hard work in favor of the great American dream of ease and forty-hour weeks.
I do not speak as an uncompromising champion of horses. I actually prefer my 1950 WD Allis Chalmers which has cost me hardly $5000 total during all the years I have owned it. But that is not my point. I just wonder if we are not making a mistake by not taking seriously what the Amish are demonstrating to us. Given the facts of the matter, I don’t think it is naïve to suggest that young garden farmers take a closer look at horses, mules, even oxen for motive power on their little farms. Quite a few already are. Given the demonstrated yearning that humans have always shown for animal companionship, it seems entirely logical to me that young farmers just might lose their acquired attraction for the tractor one of these days to become horsemen and horsewomen again. The dollars and cents, the Amish will tell you, are on your side if you enjoy being at home and would rather work hard physically on occasion rather than pay for exercise at a fitness center.
With peak oil upon us, think of it this way. You may be able to grow enough extra grain or biomass to make ethanol for a tractor, but it will always be cheaper to grow the extra hay to feed a horse.
So what do TreeHugger readers think? Has Logsdon gone down the misty path of nostalgia or might he be on to something?
Read the whole original post: Did the Amish get it right after all?
Agriculture Needs a Fundamental Rethink in the 21st Century
25% Reduction in Global Food Production by 2050: Organic Agriculture Part of the Solution
US Farmers Turning to Mule Power to Fight Rising Oil Prices