This week he started with a shot across the bows in the Opinion Section with a Food Manifesto for the Future.
As manifestos go, there is little in it that will not be familiar to TreeHuggers or Michael Pollan Fans. But is well written and more importantly, it is in the opinion section of the New York Times, more proof that these issues are really beginning to gain traction. Some of the main ideas, some with followup reading on TreeHugger:
End government subsidies to processed food. We grow more corn for livestock and cars than for humans, and it's subsidized by more than $3 billion annually; most of it is processed beyond recognition.
Begin subsidies to those who produce and sell actual food for direct consumption. Small farmers and their employees need to make living wages.
Outlaw concentrated animal feeding operations and encourage the development of sustainable animal husbandry. The concentrated system degrades the environment, directly and indirectly, while torturing animals and producing tainted meat, poultry, eggs, and, more recently, fish.
Tax the marketing and sale of unhealthful foods. Another budget booster. This isn't nanny-state paternalism but an accepted role of government: public health.
The Debate Over Subsidizing Snacks
National Soda Tax Would Make Americans 4% Less Fat
Soda Tax Could Raise $10 Billion Per Year for Cash-Strapped States
Americans Against Food Taxes?: Who's Really Fighting Preventative Medicine?
And TreeHugger food writer Kelly's favourite:
Encourage and subsidize home cooking. (Someday soon, I'll write about my idea for a new Civilian Cooking Corps.) When people cook their own food, they make better choices. When families eat together, they're more stable.
More food for thought in the manifesto at the New York Times
More Mark Bittman:
Mark Bittman on the Future of Fish
Mark Bittman TED Video: Link Between Food and the Environment
Bittman, Pogue And More On Living A Sustainable Life