Green living has often been about technology; about smart grids and hybrid cars and solar panels. But it is also about simplicity and low tech, about walkable communities and bicycles. I go on about learning from old buildings designed before the age of oil and electricity, so that we will know how to live after the oil is gone. One feature I often talk about is how our walkable communities and older buildings are resilient; they can cope better when the power goes out, and you can walk to the store when the car is out of gas. Steve Mouzon is all over this with his Original Green.resiliency; it is an invented non-word and I don't care if it is in Merriam Webster) on TreeHugger for a long time, but frankly, until recently it was the preserve of hippies and Transition Town Types.
In fact the resilience movement is growing, as is the dissatisfaction with the high tech green gizmo approach to sustainable design. You see it in houses with the Passivhaus movement, where one trades active systems for insulation and sunlight; you see it in the streets with the cycling phenomenon. It is a conscious choice to use simpler, repairable, resilient systems.
Alex Wilson, founder of BuildingGreen, which I consider to be the definitive green building website, is now acknowledging the need for Resilient Design, worrying about drought, power outages and even terrorism. He concludes:
It turns out that many of the strategies needed to achieve resilience--such as really well-insulated homes that will keep their occupants safe if the power goes out or interruptions in heating fuel occur--are exactly the same strategies we have been promoting for years in the green building movement. The solutions are largely the same, but the motivation is one of life-safety, rather than simply doing the right thing. We need to practice green building, because it will keep us safe--a powerful motivation--and this may be the way to finally achieve widespread adoption of such measures.
But what is resilient design, really? Architect Craig Applegath has been thinking about this for a while at Resilient City. , an important resource. With his permission I republish below his Resilient Building Design Principles:
Building Design Principles
Designing buildings to effectively meet the conditions and realities of a Post Carbon, Climate-Changed world will require a shift in our current understanding of what constitutes good building design and sound building practice. Many of the practices that we now take for granted, like cladding our buildings in curtain wall building envelopes, in future, may no longer be economically feasible. To address these needed changes in building design and construction strategies and techniques, we propose the following building design principles for designing and constructing buildings in a post-carbon, climate responsive building environment:
1. Use low carbon-input materials and systems:
Any materials and systems that require either significant amounts of energy, or are derived from oil by-products in their manufacture, will become economically uncompetitive because of the relative increase in energy costs on the down side of the peak oil curve, as well as the probable additional costs associated with potential future carbon cap-and-trade regulations or tariffs. Materials such as wood and low-energy input masonry should be considered as more appropriate building materials. Moreover, the use of wood as a building material will be a very effective strategy for sequestering carbon as part of future regional, national, or international carbon sequestration strategies and policies.
2. Design and plan buildings for low external energy inputs for ongoing building operations:
Buildings should be designed to be highly energy efficient and include the use of highly insulated building envelopes, triple insulated glazing, and, where possible, passive solar heating with thermal mass storage systems. Where required, lighting systems should use LED task lighting in combination with natural day-lighting. Design to allow for natural ventilation, and simple low energy mechanical systems.
3. Design buildings for maximum day-lighting:
Daylight will be the primary source of lighting for buildings in a post-carbon city, so buildings should be designed to make the most of daylight for internal lighting. Because the pressure to reduce the overall surface area of glazing in building envelopes to reduce energy loss will be significant, the use of daylight will become of strategic importance in the design of building form. Narrower floor plates, internal courtyards, and atrium spaces are good examples of possible daylight effective strategies.
4. Design "generic buildings" for future flexibility of use:
Because energy costs will be higher in the post carbon city, both construction materials and the construction process will be relatively more expensive than they are now. These higher costs of construction will create an impetus for building owners to design for future flexibility in their building designs, so that later renovations and alteration can be undertaken in the most cost effective manner. The most effective strategies for designing for future flexibility are the use of modularity and standardization in the planning of program spaces. Modularity provides for building spaces to be multiples of one another, and standardization of spaces aims for the provision of “common denominator” spaces that can be used for many overlapping uses. Buildings should be designed for both first and future uses. Form should not "follow function" but instead follow many future functions.
5. Design for Durability and Robustness:
To maximize the future resilience of buildings, buildings should be designed for durability and robustness. Use materials and construction methods must be durable in the face of more energetic weather, and increasing number of significant weather events that increasing climate change will produce.
6. Design for use of local materials and products:
Resilient cities will need to be much more localized in their use of materials and products. The increased cost of energy will dramatically increase transportation-related costs of non-local materials. That should in turn create a greater demand for locally produced materials and products for building construction.
7. Design and plan for low energy input constructability:
Design and plan for buildings that can be built efficiently by manual labour, and that do not require oil-fuelled machines and systems requiring significant quantities of fuel for operation. As the cost of fuel increases as a result of the price pressures of Peak Oil, energy intensive construction techniques could become be less economically effective, and the costs of manual labour will potentially be less a less critical a factor in selecting construction techniques.
8. Design for use of building systems that can be serviced and maintained with local materials, parts and labour:
Climate change and peak oil will more than likely reduce global trade, and reduce easy access to materials, products and systems from other countries. Therefore, building systems should be designed to be serviceable through a local supply of parts and labour.
There is a huge overlap here with what I have written about learning from old buildings, rounded up here, and while Sami doesn't address resilient design, he does focus on resilient living. I round up a few of his posts below. Alex Wilson concludes:
Achieving resilience won't be easy and it will require investment, but I believe it is crucial for our future wellbeing.
More on Resilience in TreeHugger from Sami Grover:
What Happens When Resilience and Sustainability Compete?
Resilience vs Sustainability - "There are no Solutions, Only Responses" (Video)
Exploring Community Resilience in Times of Rapid Change: Inspiring Animation (Video)
Personal Resilience is as Important as Planetary Sustainability
When Low Tech Beats Fancy Innovation - Ensuring Resilience
Urban Farming, Community Resilience and the Death of the Motor Industry in Detroit (Video)
Why Resilience Beats Sustainability - Rob Hopkins on Transition in the City (Video)
Real Resilience Comes from Expanding Our Footprint?!