What's the Difference Between Global Warming and Climate Change?

Though they are used interchangeably, the terms are indeed different.

Huge Forest Fire in Red Pine Forests

AegeanBlue / Getty Images

The terms “global warming” and “climate change” are often used interchangeably. In the scientific literature, climate change and global warming are inextricably linked, even if they are distinct phenomena. The simplest explanation of that linkage is that global warming is the chief cause of changes in our current climate.

Here, we define both of these concepts, describe how they are measured and studied, and explain the connection between them.

What Is Global Warming?

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has defined global warming as "an increase in combined surface air and sea surface temperatures averaged over the globe and over a 30-year period." For over a hundred years, research has been conducted to measure and pinpoint the precise causes of global warming.

Measurements Throughout History

Earth's average surface temperature has risen and fallen throughout our planet's history. The most complete global temperature records, in which scientists have a high level of confidence, date back to 1880. Before 1880, observations come from farmers and scientists who, as early as the 16th century, recorded daily temperatures, rainfall measurements, and first and last frosts in their personal diaries. This data has often been found to be accurate when compared to instrumental data.

For long-term data, paleoclimatologists (scientists who study ancient climates) rely on historical variations in pollen counts, the advance and retreat of mountain glaciers, ice cores, chemical weathering of rock, tree rings and species locations, shoreline changes, lake sediments, and other “proxy data.”

Scientists continuously refine the accuracy of the recorded data and how it is interpreted and modeled. Temperature records vary by region, altitude, instruments, and other factors, but the closer we get to the present, the more certain scientists are about the facts of global warming.

NASA graph of average global temperatures, 1880-2020

NASA Earth Observatory

Natural events such as asteroid impacts and major volcanic eruptions, for example, can have dramatic effects on global temperatures, leading to mass extinctions. Cyclical changes in Earth's position relative to the sun, called Milankovitch cycles, can influence global temperatures and have long-term effects on the climate over the course of thousands of years—though they do not account for the shorter-term changes witnessed over the last 150 years.

Indeed, for the present era, a pattern emerges from the data: Earth's average temperature has risen much more rapidly in the past 50 years than during any past warming event.

The Greenhouse Effect

Starting in the mid-19th century, scientists began identifying changes in carbon dioxide concentrations as a leading cause of global temperature changes. In 1856, American physicist Eunice Foote was the first to demonstrate how carbon dioxide absorbed solar radiation. Her suggestion that “an atmosphere of that gas would give to our earth a high temperature” is now the common understanding among scientists on the causes of global warming, the phenomenon now known as the greenhouse effect. In other words, greater levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere result in a warmer climate. Foote's contribution was soon overshadowed three years later by Irish physicist John Tyndall, who is usually credited with first describing the greenhouse effect.

By 1988, James Hansen could testify to the U.S. Congress “with a high degree of confidence” that there was a “cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed warming.” Hansen was speaking about recent global warming, but the “high degree of confidence” applies to paleoclimatology as well. By their very existence, since the emergence of life on Earth, carbon-based lifeforms have altered levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Human-Induced Causes

Aerial view of emissions rising from the cooling towers of a lignite fired power station in Germany.

Schroptschop / Getty Images

Humans have caused the most rapid and severe changes in global temperatures. Since James Hansen's 1988 testimony, the level of confidence in the anthropogenic (human-induced) causes of global warming has grown to be functionally unanimous within the scientific community.

Those anthropogenic causes are not new. As early as 1800, the naturalist Alexander von Humboldt observed how deforestation raised regional atmospheric temperatures. Just as wildfires today release tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, controlled burns have been a source of added carbon for centuries.

Those traditional practices, however, are dwarfed by the number of greenhouse gases emitted since the beginning of the late eighteenth century with the development of the coal-powered steam engine. Coal burning expanded a hundredfold in the nineteenth century, grew another 50% by 1950, tripled between 1950 and 2000, then nearly doubled again between 2000 and 2015. Oil consumption followed an even faster growth curve, expanding 300-fold between 1880 and 1988, then growing another 50% to 2015. Natural gas use has risen the quickest, expanding a thousandfold between the late 1880s and 1991, then another 75% to 2015.

Graph of global primary energy consumption by source

Our World In Data / CC BY-SA 4.0

Fossil fuel burning, which emits greenhouse gases primarily of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, may have peaked in 2017, but still made up 82% of the world's primary energy use in 2021.

The parallel growth of fossil fuel consumption and the rise in global surface temperatures is striking. Greenhouse gas emissions have risen to levels that are “unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years” and are "extremely likely to have been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century,” according to the IPCC.

A simple way to understand how fossil fuels contribute to global warming is to think of a blanket. Burning fossil fuel has wrapped the Earth in a blanket of pollution, which traps heat. The more fossil fuels we burn, the thicker the blanket gets, and the more heat can be trapped.

What Is Climate Change?

Climate is weather over a long duration. Changes in the climate created by human-induced global warming are having and will continue to have long-term effects. Those effects, once thought to begin occurring sometime in the near future, are increasingly visible today, with the most apparent being changes in weather patterns. But subtler changes to entire ecosystems also present a very serious threat.

Extreme Weather

Street in Miami flooded after a rainstorm.
Miami is among the world's top ten cities most vulnerable to sea level rise.

tovfla / Getty Images

Global warming has made the weather wilder and more unstable, as natural disasters have shown “exponential increases in recent decades” in both intensity and frequency. “Once-in-a-century” natural disasters such as wildfires, deadly heat waves, droughts, floods, tropical storms, hurricanes, blizzards, and avalanches have seen a tenfold increase since 1960.

According to the World Meteorological Organization, over the last 50 years, half of all recorded disasters and 74% of related economic losses have been due to weather, climate, and water hazards like floods.

Attributing Weather to Climate Change

It is often difficult to attribute any particular extreme weather event to global warming. Natural variability in the climate is responsible for short-term, year-to-year changes in weather patterns, especially at the regional level. But the longer-term pattern of weather events reveals the hand of climate change.

What can be attributed to global warming is a changing climate, where warmer oceans and warmer air increase the likelihood and intensity of droughts, heat waves, storms, hurricanes, and other extreme weather events. Attribution of extreme events is more a question of probabilities than certainties, given that the circumstances involved often have no historical precedents.

But by comparing current extreme events to historical ones of different intensities and different atmospheric conditions, scientists can give increasingly rigorous explanations for the role that global warming played in worsening extreme weather.

While there is often disagreement within the scientific community about the level of influence climate change has on a single extreme event, there is a solid agreement that human-induced climate change plays a leading role.

Threats to Ecosystems

Bleaching coral reef in Indonesia
Warming waters and acidification can bleach coral colonies.

Ethan Daniels / Getty Images

More deadly than natural disasters is climate change's threat to Earth's entire biosphere, the ecosystems that support life. Species that attempt to adapt to the changing climate often fail.

Coral, for example, dies as oceans absorb atmospheric carbon dioxide and become increasingly acidic. When peatlands and coastal wetlands dry out due to rising temperatures, their dead vegetation decomposes more quickly and releases greenhouse gases, contributing to a “cascading effect” where one calamity contributes to the next. Climate-driven “tipping points,” already underway, lead to major losses in biodiversity and undermine entire ecosystems.

Climate change research still contains unknowns and uncertainties. It is easier to understand the past than to predict the future of an entire planet's physical and biological systems. Yet the key uncertainty is less about the hard science of climate change and more about the social science of how humans respond to it.

Frequently Asked Questions
  • Can the climate get worse if global temperatures remain stable?

    Climate change can have cascading effects. For example, even if global temperatures remain stable, a previously forested mountain range denuded of vegetation by drought and wildfire will retain less water in its soil, produce less water vapor through plant transpiration, and dry out the local climate.

  • If we reduced greenhouse gas emissions now, how soon would we see the effects on the climate?

    According to the IPCC, significantly reducing emissions now would result in lower concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in five to ten years, which would result in lower global surface temperatures in twenty to thirty years. That is why it is urgent to increase our efforts to lower emissions immediately.

View Article Sources
  1. Allen, M.R., O.P. Dube, W. Solecki, F. Aragón-Durand, W. Cramer, S. Humphreys, M. Kainuma, J. Kala, N. Mahowald, Y. Mulugetta, R. Perez, M.Wairiu, and K. Zickfeld, 2018: Framing and Context. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 49-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.003.

  2. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report Working Group 1: The Physical Science Basis, “Frequently Asked Questions.” August 9, 2021

    Cochrane, Logan, et al. “Using farmer-based metrics to analyze the amount, seasonality, variability and spatial patterns of rainfall amidst climate change in southern Ethiopia” Journal of Arid Environments 175 (2020), 104084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.104084.

  3. Bradley, Raymond S. Paleoclimatology: Reconstructing Climates of the Quaternary. Third Edition. New York, NY: Elsevier Science & Technology, 2014.

  4. Hull, Pincelli M., et al. “On impact and volcanism across the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.” Science 367:6475 (January 17, 2020), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay5055;

    Wang, Yipeng, et al. “The relationship between volcanism and global climate changes in the Tropical Western Pacific over the mid-Pleistocene transition: Evidence from mercury concentration and isotopic composition.” Science of the Total Environment 823 (June 1, 2022), 153482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153482.

  5. Da Silva, AC, et al. “Millennial-scale climate changes manifest Milankovitch combination tones and Hallstatt solar cycles in the Devonian greenhouse world.” Geology 47:1 (2019), 19–22. doi:10.1130/G45511.1;

    Caccamo, Maria Teresa and Salvatore Magazù. “On the Breaking of the Milankovitch Cycles Triggered by Temperature Increase: The Stochastic Resonance Response.” Climate 9:4 (2021), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9040067.

  6. Foote, Eunice. “Circumstances affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays.” American Journal of Science and Arts 22 (1856), 382–383.

  7. U.S. Senate, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, "Greenhouse Effect and Global Climate Change, part 2" 100th Cong., 1st sess., June 23, 1988, 44.

  8. Lacis, Andrew A., et al. “Atmospheric CO2: Principal Control Knob Governing Earth’s Temperature.” Science 330:6002 (October 15, 2010), 356–359. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190653.

    Mills, Benjamin J.W. et al. “Modelling the long-term carbon cycle, atmospheric CO2, and Earth surface temperature from late Neoproterozoic to present day” Gondwana Research 67 (2019), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2018.12.001.

  9. Cook, John, et al. “Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming” Environmental Research Letters 11 (2016), 048002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002;

    Powell, James, “Scientists Unanimous on Anthropogenic Global Warming in 2019.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 39:1-2 (2020), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046762092215;

    Janko, Ference, et al. “Recalculating climate change consensus: The question of position and rhetoric.” Journal of Cleaner Production 254 (May 1, 2020), 120127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120127.

  10. Von Humboldt, Alexander. Personal Narrative of Travels to the Equinoctial Regions of the New Continent During the Years 1799–1804. Trans. Helen Maria Williams. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown, and John Murray, 1814–1829, vol. 4, 143–144.

  11. Lewis, Simon L. and Mark A. Maslin, “Defining the Anthropocene.” Nature 519 (March 12, 2015), 171–180. https://doi-org.une.idm.oclc.org/10.1038/nature14258.

  12. Smil, Vaclav. Energy and Civilization: A History. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2018, 297.

  13. BP. Statistical Review of World Energy. 71st Edition (2022), 3.

  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Geneva: IPCC, 2014, 4.

  15. Harrison, Colin G. and Peter R. Williams. “A systems approach to natural disaster resilience.” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 65 (2016), 11–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2016.02.008;

    Institute for Economics & Peace. Ecological Threat Register 2020: Understanding Ecological Threats, Resilience and Peace. September 2020, 48.

  16. World Meteorological Organization. WMO Atlas of Mortality and Economic Losses From Weather, Climate and Water Extremes (1970–2019). 2021.

    Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. Disasters Year in Review 2021. April 2022.

  17. Engineering and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, and Committee on Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change Attribution. Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2016.

  18. Voosen, Paul. “Studies tying weather extremes to global warming gain rigor.” Science 376:6599 (June 17, 2022), 1256–1257. DOI: 10.1126/science.add4866.

  19. Kirchmeier-Young, Megan C, Hui Wan, and Xuebin Zhang. “Using a model comparison to support the interpretation of extreme event attribution.” Weather and Climate Extremes 26 (June 2022), 100444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2022.100444.

  20. Radchuk, Viktoriia, et al. “Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient.” Nature Communications 10(3019), (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10924-4.

  21. Mostafa, Khan M.G. et al. “Reviews and Syntheses: Ocean acidification and its potential impacts on marine ecosystems.” Biogeosciences 13:6 (2016), 1767–1786. doi:10.5194/bg-13-1767-2016;

    Avolio, Meghan L. et al. “Demystifying dominant species.” New Phytologist 223:3 (2019), 1106–1126. doi: 10.1111/nph.15789.

  22. Barnard, Patrick L. et al. “Multiple climate change‑driven tipping points for coastal systems.” Scientific Reports 11 (2021), 15560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94942-7;

    Sarà, Gianluca, et al. “Multiple climate-driven cascading ecosystem effects after the loss of a foundation species.” Science of the Total Environment 770 (May 20, 2021), 144749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144749.

  23. IPCC, “Frequently Asked Questions,” op cit.