Image Credit: Jon Curnow via Flickr
MikeZ has a problem with high speed rail travel:
The way I look at it, the competitors to High Speed rail are: 1) Cars, which driving long distances on the highway are in their most efficient operating mode. 2) Planes, which get around 40-50 mpg per seat. In addition, the only attempt at long distance rail travel, AMTRAK, is losing ridiculous amount of money and has operating costs on a per seat-mile basis massively more than any airline. Yet people advocate spending billions on high speed rail. Instead why not dedicate that money towards commuter rail and light rail?
What do you think? Join the conversation.
Read more about the cases for and against high speed rail travel.