Image: Energy Star
Energy Star Approval Process Not Very Discriminating
The EPA's Energy Star program is great in theory. It helps consumers quickly recognize the most energy efficient products and, hopefully, encourages them to pick those over the less efficient models. But the problem is that Energy Star relies too much on self-reporting by the product makers, making it relatively easy to game the system. To demonstrate this, the Government Accountability Office conducted a secret evaluation by submitting 20 fake products (including a gasoline-powered alarm clock!) and 4 fake companies for Energy Star approval. The results are shocking.
A screen grab form the fake company website that got approved for Energy Star partnership. It's still online here.
GAO's investigation shows that Energy Star is for the most part a self-certification program vulnerable to fraud and abuse. GAO obtained Energy Star certifications for 15 bogus products, including a gas-powered alarm clock. Two bogus products were rejected by the program and 3 did not receive a response. In addition, two of the bogus Energy Star firms developed by GAO received requests from real companies to purchase products because the bogus firms were listed as Energy Star partners. This clearly shows how heavily American consumers rely on the Energy Star brand. The program is promoted through tax credits and appliance rebates, and federal agencies are required to purchase certain Energy Star certified products.
Four fictional firms with crappy websites and products that existed on paper only were granted Energy Star partnerships, including the obviously tongue-in-cheek Tropical Thunder Appliances.
It's pretty obvious that many of the applications weren't even read. I mean, who in their right mind woud approve a gasoline-powered alarm clock that is described in the application as being "the size of a small generator and powered by gasoline"? This looks like a textbook case of rubber stamping...
Known Problem, Potential Solutions
Sadly, this isn't exactly a new problem. Last year Jaymi wrote about it here. But there's some hope. The EPA and DoE have said that they would tighten the standards of Energy Star testing, which is good, but if they want to avoid some big scandal in the future that could forever tarnish the Energy Star logo, they better act quick.
Via Government Accountability Office, Popular Mechanics
More on Energy Efficiency
This is Important: What Would 1 Million Electric Cars do to the Grid?
Ford Saves $1.2 Million and Reduces CO2 Emissions by Around 20,000 Tons by Turning Computers Off
Networked Traffic Lights Could Save Time, Fuel, and Lives