photo: Ricardo Villela via flickr
It's pretty much conventional wisdom in the green community that the cost of preventing climate change now will be less than the cost of doing nothing and trying to adapt later, even if it costs 1-2% of global GDP. Well, IPCC chairman Dr Rajendra Pachauri has take one more step, The Guardian quoting Pachauri saying "the cost [of tackling climate change now] could undoubtedly be negative overall." As in the economic benefits are greater than the costs incurred:He went on to say that if the costs are negative that "inertia and vested interests would be washed away. As the Americans say, it would be like dollar bills lying on the sidewalk."
Pachauri highlighted greater energy security with consumers being protected from wild price spikes for energy, expanding green jobs, more productive agriculture, lowered air pollution, and lower health care costs as all being benefits of tackling climate change now, which have genuine, quantifiable economic benefits.
I'm not so sure it's quite as easy as that -- and Pachauri gave no stats on exactly how profitable he thought fighting climate change would be -- but, nevertheless the benefits of acting now are great, both economically and ecologically.
via: The Guardian
Global Warming Solutions
Saul Griffith Discusses Starting from the Global Warming Finish Line (Video)
Nobel Winners: Global Climate Change Poses Threat of 'Similar Proportions' to Thermonuclear Weapons
Big Climate Change Fail: Major Nations Fail to Agree to 50% Emission Cuts by 2050 (UPDATED)