The libraries represent an invaluable source of scientific knowledge on issues from hazardous waste to pollution control. To make the best scientific determinations, scientists need access to this information. In 2005, EPA’s dedicated library staff fielded more than 134,000 database and reference questions from agency scientists and the public.In February 2006, under the guise of cutting costs, the Bush Administration proposed cutting $2 million out of the $2.5 million library services budget for fiscal year 2007. Such a drastic cut would ensure the closing of most of the library network, but would hardly register as a cost savings in the $8 billion EPA budget.
Several newspapers have covered impact of the closings, including The Christian Science Monitor, The Boston Globe, The Los Angeles Times, and the Kansas City Star. The decision of the EPA to limit access to these valuable resources is part of a greater problem of interference with the work of EPA scientists and scientists across the federal government.
Despite the fact that Congress has not yet approved these funding cuts, the EPA has already moved with lightning speed to close down several of its libraries to both the public and EPA staff. Five libraries have already been closed, and in Chicago, furniture and library equipment originally purchased for $40,000 was sold at auction for an only $350. Some books, reports and other resources have been sent to repositories where they remain inaccessible. Other materials have already been recycled or thrown away.
Please call Administrator Johnson’s office and tell the EPA that scientists and the public need these libraries. But before you call…
The people answering the phones at EPA are claiming that UCS is distributing misinformation and that the library closures are really just part of a modernization process. We invite you to look at the evidence yourself before calling: the libraries are closing, information is being dumped, and many, many questions remain.
Other callers have also been told that it is more effective contact their members of Congress rather than the EPA. Congress is already aware of this problem and has asked the EPA to cease and desist. Now, the decision to stop closing the libraries lies with EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson.
While contacting your representatives in Congress would also help, the most effective step you can take to help preserve the EPA library system is to call Administrator Johnson’s office.