The article points out that getting wood from local forests makes a lot more sense and takes a lot less fuel than dragging it across the country. "Its easier on the planet for people to make more and better use of local resources- from vegetables to trees- than importing it from afar, where ecological safeguards can be minimal".Last summer this treehugger spent a day tromping in the woods with loggers, consultants hired to watch the loggers, and Ministry of Natural Resources people hired to watch everyone. The forest areound our cabin was to be logged according to Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) procedures. We were there to protest but in the end were impressed how there was a reason for every tree that was to be cut or saved, and how the loggers had to take out the diseased crap as the price of doing business. It was clear that the forest was going to be better off after than before.
We can't say read more from the WSJ because it is subscription only. We will instead do our usual rant that perhaps the WSJ would not be losing money and readers if it did not hide itself from the rest of the world by fencing off its contents. by [LA]