That's fog, not pollution... photo: Ingrid Taylar via flickr
Compared to sending goods long distances by truck or airplane is far less efficient than sending them by ship, and on the level of an individual product the emissions not that great, in the aggregate shipping is a major source of emissions—about 3% of global emissions in fact. A new report though shows that the shipping industry not only need not worry about emission reduction programs increasing their costs; in fact, deploying methods to cut emissions could actually save the industry money:That's the word coming via WWF of the International Maritime Organisation. According to their new report, in a business-as-usual scenario global shipping emissions could double or even triple by 2050. However, existing operational and technological efficiency measures could reduce emission rates by 25-75%. (A pretty big range...)
Kites, Going Slower, Hull Upgrades... All Would Save Money and Reduce Emissions
The Second IMO GHG Study says that many of these efficiency improvements will actually save more money than is required to implement them. Measures cited as being ultimate money savers include using kites to supplement engines, speed reductions, and upgrades to hulls, engines and propellers.
The report also found that emissions trading schemes or a bunker fuel levy would be effective methods in reducing shipping emissions.
More: WWF (press release)
Ship or Truck Transport Makes All the Difference in Wine's Carbon Footprint
"Just 15 of the world's biggest ships may emit as much pollution as all the world's 760m cars"
Commercial Shipping Particle Air Pollution = Half That From All the Cars in the World
Cargo Ship with Kites: First Trans-Atlantic Trip a Success!
Slow Freight: Sail Power is Actually Faster Than Containerships Today