Can the ESL Knock Out the CFL? Perhaps, but Not the LED.

vu1 esl bulb photo

Migrated Image /

Compact fluorescents are not without their problems. A lot of people don't like the light from them and disposal is an issue. But LED replacements are still expensive.

Enter the Electron Stimulated Luminescence (ESL) bulb. Core77 writes that they have just received UL approval, a necessary step for coming to market, and the Seattle based company VU1 put them on the market in early 2011 and sells the bulbs on their website.

vu1 esl bulb photo quality
The difference in light color by ESL, LED, CFL, and incandescent bulbs.

The company claims that the bulbs have much better light quality, comparable to full-spectrum incandescent light.

Electron Stimulated LuminescenceTM (ESL) Lighting Technology is an entirely new, energy efficient lighting technology. It uses accelerated electrons to stimulate phosphor to create light, making the surface of the bulb "glow". ESL technology creates the same light quality as an incandescent but is up to 70% more energy efficient, lasting up to 5 times longer than incandescent and contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. There is no use of the neurotoxin Mercury (Hg) in the lighting process.
vu1 esl bulb photo explanation

The bulb works like an old cathode ray tube, with an electron gun of some sort firing a spray of electrons at a screen with a proprietary phosphor. It fits in standard Edison sockets.

It is not without its limitations. It pumps out 30.7 lumens per watt, giving a 19.5-watt bulb the lighting equivalent of a 65-watt incandescent bulb. That is half the efficiency of modern compact fluorescents or LED fixtures. (Mike has shown us some LEDs that get 140 lumens per watt) It lasts 10,000 hours, three times what an incandescent might, but that is a quarter of the life of an LED. It can operate in any position without overheating, which is a problem with CFLs. It is instant-on at full brightness. It has a color rendering index (CRI) of 85, which is excellent.

On the other hand, it is only twenty bucks, a lot less than the equivalent LED. Smells like an interim technology, but I would only swap out the CFLs where the color temperature was a really important issue, they are still far more efficient. And in the long run, the efficiency of LEDs will put these to shame.