Built on a Tilt: Snøhetta's Zero Energy House Is Completed in Norway

This story is part of Treehugger's news archive. Learn more about our news archiving process or read our latest news.
©. Bruce Damonte via Designboom

During the construction of Snøhetta's Zero Energy House, we wrote that the house would generate more energy than it would take to build it, operate it, and charge the car in the garage. In fact, this house is built to what is probably the toughest energy standard in the world, tougher than even the Living Building Challenge. That's because it not only has to produce more energy than it uses, it has to repay the debt of all the energy it took to build, and that is embodied in the materials it is made of, amortized over the estimated life of the house. Now it's done, and our friends at Designboom have photos.

zero energy house interior

© Bruce Damonte via Designboom

As I noted in my coverage of the first building made this way, that means no plastic foams and no concrete, both commonly used in green buildings.

In America, the plastics industry would go crazy over a standard like this; In each square foot of R-20 insulation, cellulose insulation embodies 600 BTU, Mineral wool 2,980 BTU, and Expanded polystyrene is 18,000 BTU (according to Martin Holladay at the GBA) The concrete industry, responsible for 5% of the CO2 emitted in the world, would be making cement overshoes.
emissions from zero energy house

© Research Center on Zero Emission Buildings

This kind of thinking is hotly disputed, with many designers claiming that the energy saved by using foam insulation more than compensates for its embodied energy. They wouldn't even bother doing this kind of calculation, which interestingly shows that the manufacture of the photovoltaics has by far the highest embodied energy.

section of house

© Snohetta

This ain't no dumb home either, there is a lot of technology that has to be maintained over the life span of the house, some of which probably will have to be replaced at some point. I wonder if they take that into account in the calculation. Perhaps it is; according to The Nordic Page.

The goal of creating buildings that do not contribute to climate change is defined here in its most ambitious form: zero emission buildings must achieve a balanced carbon footprint throughout the course of their whole existence, including construction, operations, and demolition.
closeup of exteior

© Snohetta

Wouldn't it be wonderful if everyone thought this way about building. More at Snohetta and Designboom

The architects did some of the most hyper-realistic renderings I have seen; it was hard figuring out what was real. I hope I have this right.

stair interior of house

© Bruce Damonte via Designboom