The Week in Design, from poop to passivhaus

« 1 of 8
One Bryant Park

credit: One Bryant Park/ Cook+Fox

« 1 of 8

The debate on the Bank of America Tower

It all started with Sam Roudman's article in The New Republic, Bank of America's Toxic Tower: New York's "greenest" skyscaper is actually its biggest energy hog As editor of architecture and design I had written about this building twice, including a post where I noted that it has been called "The World's Greenest Skyscraper". I objected to a lot of Roudman's post and countered with LEED-bashing: Is the Bank of America Building really a "toxic tower"? .

Roudman responded in Metropolis with The Debate on the Bank of America Tower Continues. and I run out of gas with The debate on the Bank of America Tower continues, Round 4

In the end, I feel that Roudman makes some good points, that the LEED certification for the building (and ignoring the tenant) is confusing, and that it is all very complicated.

WHAT'S HOT ON FACEBOOK