"Clean Coal" Has Prospered With Totalitarian Rule And Oil Shortage

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 01. 8.09
Business & Politics

lincoln-memorial-photo
Lincoln Memorial (1922) - Washington, DC; Henry Bacon, FAIA. Image credit:AIA Archiblog
History indicates that two conditions are required for "clean coal" to prosper: oil shortages and a rigid form of government. China is now clearly in the lead.

By 2010, China will have installed 29 [coal] gasification projects since 2004, compared with zero in the United States, according to the Gasification Technologies Council, a trade group based in Arlington, VA. Most of these Chinese projects turn coal into synthesis gas (or syngas)--a blend of carbon monoxide and hydrogen--to feed catalysts that synthesize chemicals and fuels.
Via:4Engr.com, The United States and China are both focusing on technologies to clean up coal power.

While this story conveniently misses a few key points - take, for example, the fact that the syngas plants, operated with direct Chinese government incentives, manufactured excess amounts of melamine, off spec portions of which ended up contaminating human foods worldwide; and also take into account the fact that no one is saying what exactly is happening to the mercury or arsenic or lead being extracted from the syngas process (as they should be) - the basic point is clear. But lets amplify a bit.

The process of coal gasification was invented and perfected by the German Nazi regime, details of which are under investigation at Texas A&M. The driving force at the time was a shortage of oil.

After WWII, clean coal technology prospered in South Africa. See the following excerpt from the Sasol (SA syngas firm) website for details.

It was realised then that, because South Africa did not have crude oil reserves, the country's balance of payments had to be protected against increasing crude oil imports. After many years of research and international negotiations, the South African Coal Oil and Gas Corporation was formed in 1950.

Then came China, with the USA the next target market.

Will the USA become the next place where "clean coal" prospers? If history is any guide, the power of democracy and of the free market are strong determinants.

Looking forward, however, coal-based liquid fuels, produced on a massive scale, are a predetermined element of the American future unless plug in hybrids and renewable sources of electricity come to dominate the transportation landscape over the next 30 years. A precondition of that surely must be a stronger understanding of climate risk with voters.

More on coal syngas.
Montana Governor Promotes Coal to Gasoline Conversion
Big Coal's Back Is Covered, Business-As-Usual Climate Scenario ...
America to the World: Drop Dead, We Have Coal.
Got Melamine? 53000 Chinese Children Did - In Their Milk
Oh..Great - Our Access To Coal Is Only Limited By Imagination ...

Follow @TreeHugger on Twitter & get our headlines with @TH_rss!

Comments (3)

This is one of the best-written articles I've seen on TH lately. Very insightful.

jump to top Anthony [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

I have to disagree, Anthony. This article has both a factual inaccuracy and a misleading premise.

Firstly, the gasification process used today is an updated version of the original Fischer-Tropsch process, in fact the term is still in use. It was invented in the 1920s in Germany to provide a secure fuel source for the oil poor but coal rich nation. So it was not invented by the Nazi regime, although naturally it was used by them later.

Secondly, the author is straining the meaning of the term “clean coal” and in doing so does a disservice to Treehugger readers. The phrase “clean coal” is generally used to describe Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS), a process where CO2 is captured at a coal power plant and stored underground. *If* this process were successful it would be “clean” regarding its CO2 pollutants. Hence the phrase “clean coal.”

By confusing CCS with gasifying coal you mix two very different processes, and if we in the Treehugger community want to be as well armed with information as possible it is important that we know the science behind each. Yes, occasionally the term “clean coal” is used to describe just about any coal technology by green-washing PR campaigns, but the journalists at TH shouldn’t fall for their intentional obfuscation.

jump to top Green Architect [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

It amazes me that the myth of clean coal is not adequately discussed in the television news media, however, it does give me hope to see people commenting on just that, even if it is online. We all know that the internet has the ability to affect massive amounts of change, and I hope the issue of clean coal is one of them. If you have not yet discovered it, there is a coalition of many groups dedicated to fighting the misinformation about clean coal. www.powerpastcoal.com has launched a 100 Days of Action to Power Past Coal campaign, and its goal is to provide, through the website, the ability for community activists to add their local events and gather information about clean coal. Please check it out, and let’s make this a powerful campaign. In order to do that, we need all the assistance we can get.

jump to top Kate S says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)