Questions for the McCain / Obama Debate
by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 10.15.08

Forget the town hall with the scripted questions, forget the one minute responses and the tight rules that make the debates so formal and boring, loosen up guys, and while you are relaxed and ready to rumble, how about answering some questions from the TreeHugger Team. No softballs here.

JH: Both of your campaigns talk about the need for renewable energy. Yet it is the upcoming generation of Americans who will fully embrace clean energy technologies. What will your administration do to get information about renewable energy taught in public schools on a widespread level?

CD: Given the economic troubles we're currently experiencing, what do you make of Van Jones' assertion that 'green collar' jobs and investing in a green economy are a sustainable way forward? What would your administration do to support green economic growth that would create more American jobs, help reduce poverty, and honor the Earth?

CT: Mr. McCain, In 1972 aerial wolf hunting was made illegal by the Airborne Hunting Act, passed after a nationwide outcry against aerial hunting of wolves in Alaska. Since then the Alaska Government has used a loophole in the act that allows for "control." What are your thoughts on the controversial policy your running mate, Sarah Palin, supports in Alaska that encourages hunters to shoot wolves from helicopters?

LA: Cities account for 65% of the population, but according to Lawrence Levy of the National Center of Suburban Studies, Cities generate 74 percent of the country's college graduates, 76 percent of its relatively high-paying jobs, 78 percent of its patents, 79 percent of its air cargo and 94 percent of its venture capital financing.
But they have a disproportionate share of social, educational and other problems and receive far less per capita from washington for services- the American dream was built in the suburbs and that is where the money went. Now, with so much of the suburbs in foreclosure, it looks like that is where the money is going to go again, increasing the disparity.
What would you do to fix our cities, and to end this political divide between the urban and suburban voter?

MO'N: Though you have differing opinions on health care reform, you both agree that the system is currently expensive and crippled. what will you do to promote a cleaner environment -- for example, cleaner indoor environments in schools as well as less air pollution in cities -- to ensure that health care cost go down via prevention?

This sure ain't the Lincoln-Douglas debate where the crowd could get right up there and ask a question. But if you could, what would you ask?
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- We Want Renewable Energy & Green Jobs Too: Native American Groups Tell Obama
- Creating New Jobs By Investing In Renewable Energy And Energy Efficiency
- Green Jobs Advocate to Head Labor Department
- Corn Ethanol Is Stupid: 13 Year Old Weighs In On Renewable Energy

























all questions are for both parties:
1) do you support reforming the MPG ratings of vehicles to represent ACTUAL OBSERVED performance via collection of data from existing on-board electronics in every vehicle, since the EPA test models are consistently incorrect?
2) do you support increasing fossil fuel taxes to pay for damage caused by excess atmospheric CO2, reduce volatility of energy prices, and encourage conservation?
3) would you allow EPA NOx standards to be reduced to allow faster small diesel vehicle sales growth, including vehicles like the 70 mpg diesel yaris?
4) would you support eliminating the legal distinction between "trucks" and "cars" for gas-guzzler taxes, safety standards, EPA fuel economy standards, and emissions requirements?
5) why have you supported the obviously inferior ethanol subsidies, when 100% back-compatible biofuels (such as biobutanol) exist that could be used in every car on the road today and require no new transportation infrastructure?
there are plenty more, but that is what I would start with. I'd say that the fuel tax questions would be the best place to start. nothing drastic, just hold fuel prices where they are today by progressively adding taxes while the price of crude decreases.
I am hoping for a slugfest but I think it will shrink away to the boring exchange of the other week.
Yaawwwnnn.
I think many of the changes that are needed for alternative fuels will be private industry driven.
Unfortunately, the public is starting to forget all about the triple digit oil prices. I saw an article somewhere about SUVs being a bargain with cheaper gas returning.
I hope the electrics catch on!
I think the debate will be ... less than electric.
vsk