most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Andrea Kay Smith said: "ON CHARACTER: When I was young, I ignored bullies. When I became a vegetarian, in high school, I did the same thing and just laughed off the..." [read]

Eric said: "I commute each day for 15 minutes on my Strida, which has a belt drive, and the main benefit I get from it is clean pants. It takes about 3 petal r..." [read]

dış cephe said: "thanks...." [read]

Willy Bio said: "Well, Mr. Smarty, by your own admission, you already have. So please, enlighten us...." [read]

scott said: "The powers that be will allow no change to occur. They are what needs to change. It will likely take violent revolution to do so. We have h..." [read]

Pile-up Housing by Hans Zwimpfer: Can You Patent Architecture?

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 10. 6.08
Design & Architecture

pile up housing photo

The New York Times covers 78 year old Hans Zwimpfer's Pile up housing. They call it a solution to sprawl, describing it as follows: "Take single-family houses, whose benefits — space, privacy, light, a yard — suburbanites are loath to give up. Then simply stack the houses, one on top of another. Voilà: The comforts of suburban living, with the convenience and ecological benefits of urban density."

But Sally Crane does not go into the most unusual and controversial part of Zwimpfer's work- he patented it.

zwimpher unit image

US Patent 7,237,361 describes the system:

"The invention presents the concept of a residential building which is constructed on the principle of staggered dwellings. The staggered dwellings each have a single-storey dwelling part (10, 23) and a two-storey dwelling part (11) with outdoor area. The living area (10 and 11) of the dwelling is open and allows individual living requirements to be realized with a variability which has not been known up until now. The division of space is not fixed by the static system. The type of accommodation presented can be realized in all types of urban construction such as blocks of flats, block-edge developments or high-rise buildings from two storeys upwards. The sizes of dwellings may be determined in accordance with the location and the target group. Combining the accommodation with service-related and commercial use is made possible in a completely new way using this principle."

zwimpher-patent image

None of that sounds very different from what Le Corbusier did in the Unite D'Habitation in Marseilles or what Moshe Safdie did in Habitat 67. I also wonder if he could possibly defend it; architectural patents are really tough.

lloyd alter patent image

I got one once, good old number 5469669,, cost me thousands and looks very impressive on the wall. But change one thing and it is no longer the same building or idea, so it was pretty much worthless. I doubt that Mr Zwimpfer's is much better. Architects have been honouring, referencing, learning from and stealing from each other since Hammurabi and a patent isn't ever going to stop it.

::New York Times See also ::aarchitecture-ready for copyrights?

TreeHugger on (unpatented) green apartments

Tridel Element Eco/Luxury Apartments
Greenbelt Condos in Brooklyn Propel Green Living and the Arts ...
The Greenest Apartment in London


Comments (1)

Lloyd,

While I like the building I have to say that the current patent system is very broken -- that this innovation ( not invention ) was granted a patent is just one more example of how broken it is.

jump to top TrollPatrol [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads