most popular:
Global Warming and War?



planet green: Home Improvement


most popular:
Un-TreeHugger Products


Fiber Composites: Materials Of Green Energy Production

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 10. 2.08
Science & Technology (alternative energy)

molds removed wind turbine blade manufacturing seimens photo

The trade publication Plastics Technology Online has an excellent technical article on the manufacturing of wind turbine blades. Awesome reading if you are a wind-industry insider. Or, if you have a degree in chemistry or chemical engineering. The scale of making turbine blades from fiberglass and carbon fiber is amazing, physically and financially. An industry expert interviewed for article stated that he "expects the global wind energy market for composites to be worth about $6 billion by 2012."

The manufacturing process has similarities to the manufacture of kayaks, truck fairings, bathtubs, shower stalls, bumpers, speed boats, trailers and RV bodies. Some key ingredients: epoxy and polyester resins, glass and carbon fiber, balsa wood, and PVC foam. Glass is the big one.

Typically composed of 70% to 75% glass by weight, these aerodynamically designed blades must meet very strict mechanical requirements such as high rigidity and resistance to torsion and fatigue. High static and dynamic loads over a wide temperature range are typical during a 20-yr service life. A standard 35- to 40-meter blade for a 1.5-MW turbine weighs 6 to 7 tons.
Image credit:Turbine blade half removal, Siemens AG

The Danish company LM Glasfiber A/S uses robots to help produce

the industry’s longest wind blade. The 61.5-m (202-ft) blade, built for a 5-MW turbine from Germany’s REpower Systems, weighs 17.8 tons. The turbine has a rotor diameter of 126 m (413 ft) and the three blades cover an area almost the size of two football fields.
Seeing one of these up close would be a good object lesson for those who argue that wind power can't be competitive because its' 'intermittent.' No one is going to invest in a technology at this scale to access an unreliable source of energy.

Via;:PTOnline,Composites, Wind Power Blades Energize Composites Manufacturing

Comments (3)

Well, wind is intermittent. However, this can be compensated for by creating an interconnected grid of dispersed windfarms. Studies show as few as eight interconnected wind farms can produce reliable electricity, although I don't know how far apart the farms need to be. Also, you must build a lot of extra capacity. Wind turbines have a capacity factor of about 30-35%, so a 1.5 MW turbine only averages 0.5 MW. Essentially, you have to build almost three times as much wind capacity as you do nuclear capacity to have the same amount of electricity (nuclear has a capacity factor of 90%).

jump to top JSDreyer [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

In response JS Dreyer:

I would think the investment cost of a nuclear facility (not to mention long term costs of waste storage) would match or exceed equivalent wind farm(s) investment.

jump to top Chris says:

Chris,
I wasn't sure, so I ran the numbers. A new 1 gigawatt nuke plant is about US$7 billion. That produces an average of 900MW of electricity. Since on shore wind turbines have a capacity factor of about 30%, you'd need 3 gigawatts to produce 900 MW on average. On shore wind costs about US$2m per megawatt, so 3 GW is $6 billion. THere are extra costs to both, but I counted them as a wash. Essentially, they cost the same, but wind turbines have had their costs driven up recently due to high demand. This should come down as more players enter the market. So, overall, wind is a bit cheaper now, and will more so in the future. And no nasty messes to clean up and store for 10000 years.

jump to top JSDreyer [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)




th top picks