most popular:
Global Warming and War?



planet green: Home Improvement


most popular:
Un-TreeHugger Products


Taking Back the Streets: Parking Meter Parties

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 09.22.08
Cars & Transportation (bikes)

street-haircut.jpg
Coupe Bizzare cutting hair in the street

It was supposed to be a big party for World Car-Free Day. "According to the same guys that ticket cyclists for biking the wrong way down one-way streets, a bicycle is a “vehicle”. Thanks to this categorization, you can legally transform any parking spot into a park by feeding the meter and parking your “vehicle” (i.e. your bike) there instead - don’t forget to display your receipt under your “windshield”.

street-bike-repair.jpg
Bike Pirates fixing bikes

"Roll out sod, have a tea party, play chess, sing a song, issue fake traffic tickets - the street is your playground! Even auto-addicts can’t hide their curiosity. You’ll make a lot of strangers re-think their urban landscape."

street-shoe-toss.jpg
Australian Boot Company Tossing Shoes

Perhaps I got there too early, because I saw just three spaces occupied by something other than cars. Last year was far busier. ::Streets are for People

Taking back The Streets In TreeHugger
Taking Back the Streets: Caravan by Kevin Van Braak
Taking Back the Streets : Dumpster Diving in Style
Turning Parking Spaces into Parks
Taking back the Streets: Its Called Roadwitching

Comments (15)

This sounds like a real A-hole move, and an easy way to get hurt by pissing some one off. Why go so far out of your way to take up parking spots in a place that already has limited parking.

jump to top James J says:

This is great! It would be best to take every parking spot in a whole street (or more) and have a street long 'party' area on both sides of the road all day long. (Then finally, backward jurisdictions like NYC might stop being such anti-bike fascists).

jump to top ronjoe says:

I agree, what a dick move

jump to top Anonymous says:

James, the idea IS to prevent someone from parking.

However, I question the legality of playing in the street. In Edmonton, you must walk on the sidewalk if there is one present. You may only walk on the street to cross or enter/load a vehicle.

jump to top brennan says:

MY PLAN FOR AMERICA (THAT INCLUDES YOU CANADA): A COUCH AND A TV FOR EVERY PARKING SPACE!

Better yet, how about making these parking spaces pay for themselves... instead of being publicly subsidized by hard working tax paying pedestrians and bicyclists!

Also, I say, lets begin oil exploration in all the millions of acres of land used for auto parking! Drill, baby, drill! Hey, at least if you can't find crude you might be able to recapture some of the waste motor oil waiting to enter the water table!

-Patrick-

jump to top patrick says:

It is a dick move only in that it was done (by the photographic evidence anyway) by only a few people. However, if/when several more people do it, then it suddenly transforms from some sort of penile-reference to a "popular movement."

Organizations rent out parking lots for the purpose of holding events in them. Other organizations (business groups, non-profits, athletic sponsors, etc) petition their city to close down streets to have parades, street fairs, street races. Neighborhoods close down streets for block parties. These are all "dick moves" that have moved to a point of being a "popular movement." This gives them legitimacy.

I ask the anonymous commenter (and James J who's sentiment he seems to support) if he (I'm assuming here) would say that it's a "dick move" if an entire block (or even a section of a city) was shut down for protests; a civic pride event; a political rally; a sporting event; a street fair; etc. What's the transition point between "dick move" (or James J's "A-hole move") and "popular movement"?

jump to top Umlud says:

I must comment on this...

As far as the bikes as vehicles comment.. They are and that is how the law sees them. And I believe they need to obey the traffic laws. But on things like intersections and stop signs. The one way street ticket seems extreme tho.

As far as the parking spots... I think it's a great idea to do what they did.. as long as they feed the meter. I think as far as the city is concerned.. the space is rented.. regardless of what is in the spot.

jump to top Elepski says:

if you don't get it
and what the point is
i don't get how you can't get it..
it's a small protest that might just be legal.
what, are you car drivers or something?

jump to top ron says:

MY PLAN FOR AMERICA (THAT INCLUDES YOU CANADA): A COUCH AND A TV FOR EVERY PARKING SPACE!

Better yet, how about making these parking spaces pay for themselves... instead of being publicly subsidized by hard working tax paying pedestrians and bicyclists!

Also, I say, lets begin oil exploration in all the millions of acres of land used for auto parking! Drill, baby, drill! Hey, at least if you can't find crude you might be able to recapture some of the waste oil waiting to enter the water table!

-Patrick-

jump to top patrick says:

It's a dick AND douchebag move. I don't see the point in this ridiculous stunt if it means that motorists are unnecessarily forced to circle around trying to find parking, thereby burning more fuel. And what about all of the fuel used to transport those ridiculous props to the parking spaces? It seems like a bunch of a-hole hipster trustifarians who don't have to work and feel the need to garner the attention that their hard-working parents were unable to provide when they were kids.

jump to top Ed says:

I don't understand what is treehugger about limiting available parking. It's not easy to change urban planning. You have to win popular opinion. Some poor bastard had to drive around looking for an available space, wasting gas, polluting the neighborhood because some self-centered hipsters wanted to pull off a stunt that no one else appreciates. Pretty typical though for the arrogant cycling community, IMO.

jump to top the nadir says:

this just tells me it should be legal for me to park my SUV on the bike rack...

jump to top Anonymous says:

"Organizations rent out parking lots for the purpose of holding events in them. Other organizations (business groups, non-profits, athletic sponsors, etc) petition their city to close down streets to have parades, street fairs, street races. Neighborhoods close down streets for block parties. These are all "dick moves" that have moved to a point of being a "popular movement." This gives them legitimacy.
I ask the anonymous commenter (and James J who's sentiment he seems to support) if he (I'm assuming here) would say that it's a "dick move" if an entire block (or even a section of a city) was shut down for protests; a civic pride event; a political rally; a sporting event; a street fair; etc. What's the transition point between "dick move" (or James J's "A-hole move") and "popular movement"?"

Hitler led the Nazis to a "popular movement" called the Holocaust...

jump to top Anonymous says:

This is not about limiting parking or trying to honk of drivers (BTW, where to you live that there are exactly as many spaces need for all the cars and if one is consumed by something other then a car some poor soul must drive around in circles all day?) but trying to revitalize urban space. downtowns that are treated like shopping centers (park, buy, leave) tend to degrade and become less attractive, but main streets that encourage to hang out and enjoy the space thrive.
So self centered to want to live in a community.

jump to top Anonymous says:

While it's certainly a cute little stunt, they're probably not helping their cause by doing this. As far as I can see, all they're doing is irritating drivers and creating a hazardous situation. The environmental movement needs to realize that "in-your-face" activism doesn't win many friends among the mainstream.

jump to top Flahooler says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)




th top picks