most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Todd Bradley said: "Woo hoo! I had no idea this was coming, but I'm very excited about it. I just upgraded my iPhone to the new software last night. Now I can't wai..." [read]

luke said: "correct link: http://www.google.com/transit..." [read]

EcoLez08 said: "Thanks for the giggles. Too bad Treehugger was not a tad bit more inclusive and included same sex dolls...but oh well...." [read]

Dan Brockman said: "More research on the idea sounds good to me. As pointed out, there are possible downsides to nitrogen supplementation of forests, but we ma..." [read]

Soylent said: ""...which it is ONLY when compared to other meat sources, and only when it is domestically produced." As it should be. Most people want to ..." [read]

What is in Your Cookies?

by Christine Lepisto, Berlin on 09. 7.08
Food & Health (food)

New Moon Cookies photo

You probably have faced the dilemma of how to find out which products are Good and which products are Bad, never mind sorting out when Bad companies make Good products, or vice versa. A lot of consumers turn to the internet, to bloggers and reviews. But who can you trust? Who is the judge when a reputable company is accused of unsuitable practices? And what can you expect from a vendor of premium quality products?

Almost Vegetarian sent TreeHugger a tip linking their article about New Moon Kitchen cookies, asking us to spread the word to our readers. The accusations are sensational. But....are they true?

This case came to my attention at the same time I was pondering the question of how consumers can get good information so they can make good choices. I was actively looking for an example to illustrate the complexity of the issue. I could not have hoped for a better one. You be the judge.

The Case:

New Moon Kitchen bakes a great, high-quality cookie popular with Canadians looking for food which meets kosher or allergen-free standards and/or is suitable for vegans.

Almost Vegetarian warns readers: New Moon uses ingredients processed by animal bone char and containing petrochemicals.

Wow! What can a consumer do? For those concerned about the ingredients they are putting into their own bodies, or committed to reducing animal suffering, the case does not boil down to "well, the cookies taste good."

What can a company do? Clearly, New Moon Kitchens has good intentions and tries to produce a product that is a cut above. Are they guilty as charged? We started doing some Sherlock Holmes. And here is what the case might look like if it landed on Judge Judy:

The Search for the Truth:
AV:
Here I was, all set to write a nice post about these great 'vegan' cookies from New Moon Kitchen in Toronto, only to discover that the chocolate chips in some of their cookies are made with REFINED sugar. Not only is refined sugar NOT what I would call 'totally natural,' but CHARRED ANIMAL BONES are often used to refine sugar.

The chips also contain vanillin which is typically made from a PETROCHEMICAL RAW MATERIAL.

I've just polished off heaven knows how many of these things. I think I am going to be sick.

NMK:
It's Eden here. I am the owner of New Moon Kitchen.

In response to this article what I'd like to say is that in creating my products I had a few things to gear my products towards. We are dairy free, egg free, nut and peanut free, and also kosher parve. Given that - the cookies are also suitable for vegetarians.

We chose the chips for their quality (look up Barry Callebaut chocolate and their ethics and quality before slandering their great product!) and for the fact that they could guarantee a kosher parve chip that was also nut and peanut free.

We try to please as many as possible, but give no claim on perfection. Everyone has different tastebuds, and makes different choices in their diet and in their consumer options.

I found this article to be unnecessarily negative. Before dissing a product or company - it would have been nice to get some banter back and forth about our products and choices. Toni is a supporter of your blog who sent you samples in good faith. This type of "journalism" is what hurts people for no good reason.

TH to AV:
Have you verified that New Moon is NOT using natural vanillin, which can be extracted from the vanilla bean and that they ARE using synthesized vanillin?

Have you verified that New Moon has not assured that their chip supplier uses a refined sugar processed with plant-based organic carbon filters?

AV:
All the facts I have are in the post.

TH to NMK:
I would like to hear your side of the story.

NMK:
Excerpt of text from a letter from the supplier of the chocolate chips used at NMK:
"I am sure that our sugar distributor does not use charred animal bones as a filtering
agent.

TH, note to the jury:
NMK did not stop at that. NMK president Eden went further upstream to determine the actual production facility supplying the sugar to the chip maker and verified the truth of the statement.

NMK:
Here is the final say...no animal bone char.

TH:
Can you get an answer on the vanillin?

NMK:
Excerpt of text from a letter from the supplier of the vanillin in the chocolate chips used at NMK:
Advise them that the vanillin used by (Chip supplier name removed) is an artificial vanilla flavor that is 99.9 to 100 % pure. It is chemically identical to the vanillin that is present and also the main flavor component in pure vanilla extract.

The vanillin you purchase is manufactured in a plant therefore it is considered an artificial flavor as opposed to pure vanilla extract that is obtained from vanilla beans and considered natural. The vanillin molecules in both products are identical.

There is no basic petrochemical present in the vanillin manufactured by (Vanillin supplier name removed) or any other vanillin producer.

TH:
This one is a bit trickier. New Moon Kitchens does advertise their cookies as "totally natural." The artificial vanillin being used is chemically identical to the flavor molecule in natural vanilla extract. But that is certainly not what is understood by a consumer seeking a "totally natural" product.

New Moon Kitchen president Eden assured TH that NMK subscribes to a stringent safety program to ensure that all supplied ingredients continuously meet the advertised standards as non-allergenic. And the cookies are certified to Kosher standards. But it appears that the addition of an artificial flavoring two steps upstream of the cookies slipped the attention of R&D at NMK. This points out the challenges faced by a small company striving to produce a premium quality product to control all of the raw materials used. Nonetheless, NMK will have to find a supplier which can commit to providing "totally natural" chocolate chips if that remains the intended standard.

Should customers be concerned about an "artificial" ingredient in their cookies? That is a question each consumer must answer for themselves. But one thing is certain: you can put any fears about health or environmental impacts of artificial vanillin to rest.

A very large data set on artificial vanillin is available. It shows that there are no negative health effects to be anticipated from consuming vanillin; in fact, the opposite is true: some indications suggest that vanillin has an anti-mutagenic effect if anything. Furthermore, there are no indications that environmental impacts might result from the artificial vanillin industry.

If one really stretches the analysis, one might wonder if more natural vanilla would be in demand, might it create an economic basis for protecting the rainforest habitat of the vanilla bean? But given the economic premium natural vanilla can command, it is unlikely that the availability of artificial vanillin is suppressing supply of natural vanilla extract. At this point, Judge Judy turns the deliberations over to the jury.

Case Closed
So those are the facts of the case. What is your verdict?


Subscript:
TreeHugger tries to bring the Good to our readers' attention. Sometimes we get it wrong. We depend on our readers to help us in the comments where we fall down. It is certainly not the author's intention to point fingers in cases where others have it wrong, or partially wrong. Instead, the author hopes that presenting this case study will give readers pause for thought about a complex issue, and promote a community of people who, by sharing information, enable good consumer decision making. And we leave you with this final thought, paraphrasing the words of New Moon Kitchen's president:

If you are not sure about a product, contact the vendor. They should be willing to answer your questions.

Comments (19)

*whew* I am glad I bake my own darned cookies.

jump to top Ailsa Ek [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Wow, this just goes to show that my opinion that some vegans are religious fanatics; not that there's anything wrong with that.
Kosher is a religious choice as well, and there may also be some health benefits linked to eating kosher food, but the onus on ensuring that the standards are kept falls on a private or religious organization. Truth in labeling can be investigated by the courts, but the final arbiter of that standard is not government. If vegans choose, they can set up their own standard and hire Hindu monks as inspectors.
I want suppliers and manufacturers to make better products, but vilifying someone for not researching their suppliers to the last molecule is the best way to drive companies away from the natural food market. Have faith, or grow your own vanilla orchids and sugar cane.

jump to top Paul Barthle says:

This article lowers the rest of the treehugger to that of a magazine style newspapers "letters to the editor" section. The cookie maker is trying to do the right thing and an uniformed writer is talking about things which he or she knows little about. It is sad that treehugger lets such an inexperienced writer post.

jump to top Chris Higgins says:

Bravo to NMK for answering the questions. I don't like the artificial vanillin, but on the scale of things I might complain about in this world that ranks pretty close to zero.

jump to top Charlie [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

This is why I make all of my own baked goods. That and an allergy to artificial preservatives. :-D

jump to top Emily says:

Thanks Christine - for writing such an informative and diplomatic article.
I'm impressed.

And for those that have followed this thread - I always love how good things come out of "weird" things.
Since this whole issue came about - our chocolate chip supplier has located a chip for us that is dairy,egg, nut & peanut free, kosher parve, does not use animal bone char, AND contains pure vanilla extract.
So what does that leave us with? A mighty fine chip.

Isn't it strange that we focus more on what ISN'T in our food than what IS??

Kudos to all of you doing your own baking. It's a tradition that must stay alive.

Thanks!
Eden
New Moon Kitchen Inc.

jump to top eden hertzog says:

I wrote the original post (http://almostvegetarian.blogspot.com/2008/08/new-moon-kitchen-cookies-contain.html) and I am, to use a word I am told the owner of New Moon Kitchen said when she learned of the vanillin, “horrified.”

New Moon Kitchen doesn’t list these ingredients on fully half their cookies. Not only is that deceptive, but according to the Canadian Food and Drugs Act, it is illegal.

New Moon Kitchen cookies are promoted to vegans even though they are made with refined sugar. Seen any vegans lugging a 5 lb bag of refined sugar home lately? I haven’t.

New Moon Kitchen says their sugar is not refined with bone char. What they don’t say is that the manufacturer of that sugar includes bone char as one of their refining methods. Do we want to support any bone char use?

New Moon Kitchen says they are “totally natural” even though they admit one of their hidden ingredients, vanillin, “. . . is an artificial vanilla flavor . . .” Yuck.

And what does New Moon Kitchen say to excuse all this? Eden, the owner, said she “. . . give no claim on perfection.”

I am posting an update to this tomorrow at www.almostvegetarian.com.

The reply by AV is classic! They could not just admit that they were wrong, instead they attacked someone who is clearly doing her best to provide, what I can assume is, a quality product.

Why did AV request samples (note the number of cookies that they ate before realizing how horrible they are) of a product that they could have investigated beforehand? Did they just want to eat a load of free cookies? If I was a producer, I would never send a product to AV (and I hope that a lot of producers hear about this and stop sending products to them for review).

Remember, as your mother always told you, treat others has you would like to be treated.

jump to top Thad says:

Yeah, I'll just keep eating my oreos and try not to worry too much about hidden ingredients, and just keep bugging the cookie companies to move to organic options if they can. ^^

Kudos to New Moon for making such great cookies though. :)

jump to top Jen says:

It seems to me that people much of the fears regarding synthetic chemicals are born of ignorance (ignorance - not stupidity). Yes, natural vanilla extract contains other compounds in addition to vanillin, but the vanillin that it does contain is chemically identical to that which is synthesized in the lab.

A chemical is a chemical is a chemical. If it is identical at the molecular level, the manner in which it is produced is irrelevant to your body. It may be relevant to your ethics, but you should really be asking yourself whether it is the right way to be framing the issue - using natural vanilla means expensive harvesting and refinement of a relatively scarce plant. Is that preferable to a simple chemical synthesis using abundant and inexpensive inputs? If you can distinguish the difference between the two and are willing to pay a significant premium for it, then that's neither here nor there - it merely shows that you have the affluence to become very passionate about your packaged baked goods. But before you let overriding dogma steer you thinking, try and look at the big picture.

The cookie chemical debate here is really just a microcosm, though. On the whole, there is no easy answer in sustainability. It encompasses everything. Now, more than ever before, there is no black and white. Green is grey.

And really, after reading the blog post on Almost Vegetarian that spurred this fiasco, I think that kind of overreaction is just reprehensible. It was just a vitriolic smear-fest on a company that is trying to provide a more positive alternative. If you'd offered up the commentary in a sensible, constructive manner, I'm sure the inevitable result that has come about (chips sans bone char and synthetic vanillin) would be the same, but with a lot fewer hurt feelings.

It also makes me realize that while I'm a vegetarian, I have no interest being a vegan if it means consorting with people like that. Should a ferocity surrounding nebulous degrees of animal rights preclude even the most basic of courtesy for your fellow man? For shame.

Thanks for this article! I found it very thoughtful and fair. I often look into companies before I purchase anything to weigh out what is going on there and where exactly my money is going.

That being said, I have a few things to add, especially to the Almost Veg commenter:

New Moon stated that they found chocolate chips without vanillin, so isn't that matter solved?

I would think that the fact that they themselves are not using the bone char method might be as far as they can go considering the nut and peanut allergens they must avoid.

How do you know the company they use is in fact using the bone char filters? How much of it actually goes on in that company? Although these things may not matter to you Almost Veg, they matter to me. I have a serious nut allergy and finding any sort of baked goods is almost impossible.

I would like to support good companies that don’t use any bone char, and New Moon made a point to not use bone char in their cookies, which is really all I would ask of them. New Moon Kitchen is doing a fantastic job of making something available not only to vegans, but people who have multiple allergies as well.

jump to top jenna anderson says:

Wow, some people really do live in glass houses. This person from the AV blog has worked for IBM, Visa and HBO. In other words, they've worked for some of the most environmentally damaging companies around while presenting themselves as some sort of arbiter of ethics. (Don't you just hate it when people nitpick peoples efforts to do the right thing?)

Like other's have said, AV could have made their point in a much less hostile manner. We should patronize businesses that are trying their best to do the right thing and provide constructive feedback, not try to nitpick/slander them out of business.

Although there is some good for me to come out of this:
1) I learned something about refined sugar that I didn't know before and will try to buy raw sugar from now on
2) I'm going to seek out NMK cookies!

jump to top Al says:

to almost vegetarian - it's disappointing to see that your motivation for traffic to your site overtook your motivation to ensure good food products. when are you going to stop acting like a child?

to New Moon - kudos to you for handling a PR crises with class and honesty. Now, you have some great press and great chocolate chips!

to Treehugger - good for you for covering this story. when i read what was going on at AV I was saddened. That turned to being PISSED OFF when I found out that AV was NOT posting all comments (they weren't mean, just fair).

z

jump to top zoe says:

Something struck me about this...even with all the hot air from new moon kitchen and the commenters, the facts seem to be that the ingredient label was missing ingredients that had white sugar and vanillin in them. Right? Seems to me like these comments are filled with lots of strawman argument -- its hiding the facts.

The hobby blogger said no vegan would eat white sugar if they knew it was in a food, and if you know enough of these people (I live in Los Angeles) you know that’s true. Some of these people won't even watch cartoons where animals get hurt! Anyway, the blogger also said it was wrong for the food manufacturer to promote the cookies as “totally-natural” when they had synthetic vanillin and that is obviously true too.

Those are facts, and I don’t see why anyone would want to side with a company making money by not being scrupulous about the stuff they use (if I made things people ate you bet I would want to know what was in everything -- wouldn't you? Think of your kids). The AV blogger was industrious enough to find the gaffes and conscientious enough to write about them. It's the kind of responsible thing we need bloggers to do since our media is failing us!

I’ll side with the little, honest, smart blogger over the sloppy food manufacturer any day.

jump to top Rodi says:

Wow - I don't know who is in charge of writing this treehugger blog, but it makes me think for sure that this person is doing more harm in the world than good with their irresponsible fanaticism.
If you really were doing this research for the honest intentions of knowing where your food comes from, wouldn't you have contacted the owner of New Moon Kitchen directly, before writing such an aggressive post? In the end, the ingredients in question were fine, and good for Eden for handling it with such grace, but hopefully you learned a lesson -- do your research. Oh, and stop complaining. Sorry to say, but it's people like you who make vegans so unbearable. Be thankful for what you have.

jump to top Sandy says:

I have worked in the food manufacturing industry for the past 6 years and have learned a thing or two about CFIA regulations.

AV stated that NMK is breaking the law by not listing the ingredients OF ingredients. THIS IS NOT TRUE. There are a number of ingredients which are exempt from this component declaration regulation. Sugar and vanillin fall under sweetening and flavouring agents, both of which do not need to be listed when used as components of other ingredients.

I suggest AV do some research before dragging a company's name through the mud.

jump to top sje says:

@sje
Thanks for that input. Readers clearly are animated on this topic: but your input highlights exactly why I picked up this piece from AV and shared the inside story of NMK's struggle to deal with the allegations. At the core of the story is this question: how do we, as consumers, get the information we need to make good decisions. Your input confirms a critical point: we cannot rely on the government. Transparency to the consumer is essential (balanced carefully, of course, with the essential need of businesses to protect their "secret recipes"!)

If you have a reference to the laws exempting sugars and flavors, I am sure TreeHugger readers would appreciate it!

jump to top Christine says:

David and Goliath with hobby blogger Almost Vegetarian versus corporation New Moon Kitchen, Inc. who hide ingredients refined white sugar and chemical vanillin that no vegan would knwingly ever eat and AV reports on it and NMK drags out the PR machine and dumps misleading comments when they can’t debate the facts.

I hate money-grubbing corporations like New moon Kitchen Incorporation that use healthy and natural to make a profit when they don’t deny they are using refined this and chemical that and hiding them.

At least you know to watch out for the McDonalds of this world. Its worse when you find out you can’t even trust a corporation like new moon kitchen that is supposed to be one of the good guys.

jump to top Edward says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads