most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Todd Bradley said: "Woo hoo! I had no idea this was coming, but I'm very excited about it. I just upgraded my iPhone to the new software last night. Now I can't wai..." [read]

luke said: "correct link: http://www.google.com/transit..." [read]

EcoLez08 said: "Thanks for the giggles. Too bad Treehugger was not a tad bit more inclusive and included same sex dolls...but oh well...." [read]

Dan Brockman said: "More research on the idea sounds good to me. As pointed out, there are possible downsides to nitrogen supplementation of forests, but we ma..." [read]

Soylent said: ""...which it is ONLY when compared to other meat sources, and only when it is domestically produced." As it should be. Most people want to ..." [read]

OLED Screen with World's Longest Lifetime and Best Efficiency by TMDisplay

by Michael Graham Richard, Gatineau, Canada on 08.21.08
Science & Technology (electronics)

TMDisplay OLED Screens photo

OLED Screens are Coming
After spending about $140 million on production lines and unknown amounts of cash on R&D, TMDislplay, a joint venture between Toshiba (60%) and Matsushita (40%), has announced that it has developed a 2.2 inch OLED display that is the most power efficient and longest lasting in the world. The company plans to commercialize it in 2.5 inch format in 2009, for cell phones and small electronics. Not doubt the technology will eventually make its way to bigger screens.

TMDisplay OLED Technical Details
Lifetime is 60,000 hours, compared to 30,000 hours for a Sony OLED TV. That's good because initially one of the drawbacks of OLED screen were their shorter lifespans compared to LCD. That's changing. Power consumption on TMDisplay's screen is 0.1 watts, so that's very efficient, especially compared to a LCD of the same size (because it requires a backlight). Another thing to keep an eye on is using micro-lenses on OLED.

OLED vs LCD Screens image

TMDisplay:

The joint development involved the TFT substrate design technology and element design technology of [Toshiba Matsushita Display] (TMD); development of materials by Idemitsu, including RGB light-emitting materials and peripheral materials which offer high-efficiency and low-power consumption; and joint evaluation of the optimum combination of materials by both parties. As a result, TMD and Idemitsu succeeded in achieving the world's highest level of performance for an organic EL display screen of 2.2-inch QVGA (240x320) format suitable for mobile equipment applications, with power consumption of 100 mW (based on typical movie screen images, defined by 30% brightness of a full-white screen) and luminosity half-life of 60K hours (based on a full-white screen at 200 cd/m2).

OLED
OLED Breakthrough at U. of Michigan and Princeton: 70 Lumens/Watt!
GE "major milestone": Printing Organic LEDs like Paper, Applicable to Solar Panels
Osram Claims Warm White Organic LED Breakthrough

More on TMDisplay's OLED Screen
Development of Small-Molecule Organic EL Display Panels Achieves Lifetime of
60K1 Hours and the World's Highest-Level Performance

Toshiba-Matsushita jv develops advanced OLED panels
TMDisplay develops 2.2" OLED with world's longest lifetime and best efficiency

Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:



    Comments (4)

    That's cool. Of course they'll start small in cell phones, but the real payoff will be with computer screens and TVs. Cool tech.

    jump to top Anonymous says:

    If they can scale this up while holding watts/ square inch constant, then that means a 20 inch OLED widescreen TV would use

    Not bad.

    jump to top Anthony [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

    It's amazing how technology is make us more efficient. I hope they over come the issues with scaling this larger soon. IT would be nice to have an OLED flat panel TV. Not only do they use less electricity, but they also look better than LCDs.

    jump to top JSDreyer [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

    And also these devices are smaller and use less materials to make...
    and 100mW for a 2,2 inch screen would mean 10W for a 22'' - that's pretty decent.
    44'' - 40W
    66'' - 90 W - still seems pretty reasonable (who needs 66'' anyway?)

    jump to top Veiko says:

    Post a comment

    (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

    th ads
    th top picks
    th ads