most popular:
Global Warming and War?



planet green: Home Improvement


most popular:
Un-TreeHugger Products


FUEL to Open Georgia’s First Corn Ethanol Plant in October

by Matthew McDermott, New York, NY on 08.19.08
Science & Technology (alternative energy)

FUEL corn ethanol plant in Georgia photo
photo: FUEL

Given that there are much better feedstocks for biofuels than corn, it never ceases to amaze me when I hear about another corn ethanol biorefinery opening. Oh wait, I forgot, the United States is addicted to corn and corn subsidies and then dumping it in foreign markets or producing a biofuel from that very nearly requires more energy to make it than it provides...forgive me, that’s another post entirely. This one’s just about telling you about a new corn ethanol plant opening.

100 Million Gallons of Corn Ethanol Produced Annually
In a bit over two-months’ time the state of Georgia will have its first corn-based ethanol plant, the Atlanta Business Chronicle reports. October 9 will mark the day that First United Ethanol LLC (FUEL, get it...clever) will open its 100-million gallon per year, 268-acre facility near Albany, Georgia.

FUEL touts their facility

This will be a destination plant, which strategically creates value by being close to the customers and markets it serves. The facility will introduce a local source of distiller grains, which will redefine the region's poultry, cattle, and dairy feed industries. In addition, the facility will provide a new source of carbon dioxide to the southeast region which provides further manufacturing opportunities to the region. In addition to the economic impact to the region, the plant will provide farmers in the region with options to current crops, which will likely have significant subsidy pressure in the future. This project will continue to align with federal policy, which includes creating more energy security for the U.S., while sustaining or improving the environmental integrity of our air, soil and water.

Forgive me for being down on this
I’m sorry if I’ve come across a bit snide here, but the one thing the United States does not need in renewable energy is another corn ethanol plant.

In terms of biofuels—which will only ever be a part of diversified portfolio of renewable energy sources—we need to move on to other non-food crop feedstocks, ones with higher yields per acre, and ones made from waste products. It’s true that diverting corn into biofuel usage may not be the only reason food prices have risen globally, but corn ethanol still just doesn’t make sense on so many other grounds. Can we simply put this one to bed, please?

Oh wait, I forgot, the US is addicted to corn...

via :: Atlanta Business Chronicle

Ethanol
Corn Ethanol Worsens Gulf of Mexico ‘Dead Zone’
Common BioFuel Myth: Corn-Based Ethanol to Blame for Global Food Shortages
Round and Round We Go: Is Corn-Based Ethanol Viable?

Comments (11)

That's how things are done here, with a substantial lack of reason. It makes me so mad. They cut down every tree on that land, destroyed the wildlife, to build a corn ethanol plant.

jump to top Kevyn says:

Your sarcasm is rather irritating...bordering on obnoxious. Everyone knows that traditional corn-based ethanol is less than ideal. However, it's an important part of building the future infrastructure for alcohol-based fuels while more advanced technologies are preparing for volume production.

It's a huge undertaking...production and distribution networks, filling stations, flex-fuel vehicles, etc. All of this needs to happen concurrently to avoid the classic chicken-and-egg scenario. Everyone involved must see a market for their products or they will not participate.

Instead of dumping all over the project, why not be happy about the fact that it's 100-million gallons per year which comes from the farm fields instead of the oil fields.

jump to top Mr. Sinister says:

I still can't comprehend why Obama has stood behind this knd of nonsensical alternate "energy." Probably for the mid-western vote (and now GA vote).

jump to top Bill S. says:

Well, at least the have a rail link.

jump to top rob says:

can the corn ethanol facilities like this be retooled to eventually produce cellulosic ethanol from other materials, or would it be to expensive and these plants end up abandoned? just curious

jump to top scott says:

I think you forgot a "not" in "the one thing the United States does need in renewable energyis another corn ethanol plant."

jump to top Anthony [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

entrenched oil interests, scooch over... big corn's gettin' it's piece

jump to top Anonymous says:

NPR had a fascinating interview with David Blume, author of Alcohol Can Be a Gas!- while many of us know this on any given weekend, he informs much on the extraction of the carbohydrates in a fuel feed stock- say corn, or even better- cattails. The carbohydrates are used to make alcohol- ethanol in the case of this Georgia plant, but the remains of the fermentation process yields a better feed source for cattle, who were never 'designed' to handle the huge amounts of carbohydrates that they are feed on feed lots- the result is that we get BOTH a renewable source of fuel and IMPROVED feed for cattle. He also pointed out in the interview that the US uses about 2% of corn for human consumption- including the junk known as corn syrup- which he stated isn't really a food source, either. The argument is then that the use of corn for ethanol is NOT a drag on our food supply, unless (and this is significant) the production of corn is replacing other food stuffs. Remember the cattail comment? It ends up that cattails produce considerably more biofuel per acre than corn. Blume argues that production of fuel should not be centralized, as this is grossly inefficient- moving raw corn is mostly moving water- biofuels should be generated near the crops as the refined product is far more efficient to transport.

jump to top Green Kayak says:

This still props up a diseased overdependence on individual motorized transport. All biofuels do is replace a nonrenewable fuel with a renewable fuel, removing the last desperate limit that the earth had to throw at us, so that we can continue to destroy the earth for decades to come. We will still be driving too fast, too often, still designing cities poorly, deforesting land to build suburbs and strip malls, and carving the countryside up with highways that isolate wildlife. I don't see how ethanol will solve the greater problems inherent in a deeply entrenched automobile culture. That is why the announcement of yet another corn ethanol plant is less than thrilling, opinion.

jump to top Brian says:

You know what's exponentially less ideal than corn based ethanol? Continuing to send billions of US dollars to the Middle East so that Dubai can build another indoor ski slope or ice hotel.

jump to top Biltmore says:

I need one gallon of pure Ethanol. Since it arrives from Corn, therefore it can't hurt to drink it.

jump to top Dirk Diggler says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)




th top picks