most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Todd Bradley said: "Woo hoo! I had no idea this was coming, but I'm very excited about it. I just upgraded my iPhone to the new software last night. Now I can't wai..." [read]

luke said: "correct link: http://www.google.com/transit..." [read]

EcoLez08 said: "Thanks for the giggles. Too bad Treehugger was not a tad bit more inclusive and included same sex dolls...but oh well...." [read]

Dan Brockman said: "More research on the idea sounds good to me. As pointed out, there are possible downsides to nitrogen supplementation of forests, but we ma..." [read]

Soylent said: ""...which it is ONLY when compared to other meat sources, and only when it is domestically produced." As it should be. Most people want to ..." [read]

USA is the Number One Biggest Wind Energy Producer

by Christine Lepisto, Berlin on 07.22.08
Science & Technology (alternative energy)

Wind power image
Image credit: Getty Images

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) announced today that the USA has overcome Germany as the biggest generator of wind energy electricity in the first half of 2008. This milestone, which was not expected until the end of 2009, comes as a result of the higher average wind speeds in the USA, since Germany is still the leader in installed capacity.

More complete survey results will be published in the next weeks. TreeHugger will follow up with an interview with a knowledgable AWEA representative who can inform us further on:

  • What this milestone means for the US and its energy crisis.

  • ``The Pickens Plan''--is this a viable plan and why?

  • The numbers/stats behind wind energy in the US and its phenomenal growth over the last year.

  • Why transmission is critical for wind energy.

  • The Department of Energy's 20% report, and its implications.


If you have questions yourself, leave them in the comments and we will work them into the interview.

Germany Gaining Wind Power Momentum
But watch out, USA, wind power will need a "Pickens Plan" to stay ahead of Germany:
Germany Targets 125,000 Megawatts Of Wind Power By 2030
Germany Approves Offshore Wind Power Test Field in Lower Saxony
German EEG Amendments to bring greater feed-in tariffs for wind
Powering 4000 Homes: One Wind Turbine

More on the "Pickens Plan":
Wind Power to Displace Natural Gas for Electricity, Natural Gas to Power Cars: The Pickens Plan
The Pickens Plan, Part Two: Partial Deconstruction

Comments (8)

Well, we have the resources to crush the rest of the world in the wind energy sphere. I just published a blog post showing that we've only developed 2% of our total potential wind energy resources....

http://environmentaldefenseblogs.org/climateatlas/

Pretty amazing that we've finally become #1 yet have so much more to do!

Peter Black

jump to top Peter Black says:

"This milestone, which was not expected until the end of 2009"
Does that mean the US is expected to overtake Germany in installed capacity in 2009 as well?

jump to top Jeremy says:

Here are a couple of questions that I would ask of an AWEA rep:

Historically the costs for wind have been declining but there were reports that (due to high demand) costs have been rising recently. Is this true? How long does the industry expect the supply shortage to last?

How long can the industry maintain it's sizeable year over year growth?

What does AWEA believe is the ideal storage method for "excess" wind power generation?

jump to top Jeff Kuper says:

Wind prices are also increasing due to the price of raw materials, particularly the steel and polymers that make up the shaft, blades, and gear box. Of course, this same issue is driving up the price of coal and nuclear plants as well, and even affecting solar (slowing its free-falling price).

jump to top Chad says:

But Germany has less than the third of US population so when you divide the power per person that's not much of a milestone.

jump to top Jakub says:

Editorial: Taking baby steps to energy independence

Jul 24, 2008 by The Baltimore Examiner Newspaper


BALTIMORE (Map, News) - With the federal government dragging its feet on energy policy, it’s up to the states and counties to lead the way in weaning us from our finite supply of fossil fuels.

Baltimore County last week proved itself open and ready for that responsibility. Deputy Zoning Commissioner Thomas Bostwick ruled that a Monkton family could build a 120-foot wind turbine on its 50-plus acres despite the spurious arguments of some neighbors that it would lower property values in the surrounding area, hurt wildlife and be too noisy.

The approval meant granting an exception to a rule that caps poles on residential property at 15 feet. Given the cost of building the turbine, which could reach $120,000, we doubt this will start a stampede to the zoning commissioner’s door for more exemptions.

But it showed the county is ready to revisit outdated rules to adapt to a changing economic climate. To prevent more zoning debates, County Council members should address the issue and pass legislation explicitly allowing turbines. Carroll County in May passed the state’s first law allowing turbines up to 150 feet in backyards.

Aesthetics must not stop worthy alternative energy projects. No study that we can find shows wind turbines hurt property values, and accusations they will be too noisy are false. The one planned for the Antonelli family in Monkton will be as loud as a window unit air conditioner, according to the electrician for the project.

And at what price wildlife? Environmentalists say we must not drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because birds and wildlife could potentially be hurt. Must we also deny people the right to develop viable renewable energy sources because a few members of a certain species might be hurt? We need to get energy from somewhere.

Individual windmills are no solution to the state or the country’s energy problem. As Rep. Roscoe Bartlett, R-6, has pointed out in these pages, we need the equivalent of a federally funded Manhattan Project to accomplish that goal.

But in the interim, encouraging people to become energy self-sufficient by giving them the legal tools to do so only makes sense.

jump to top Al Ortiz says:

"Crush the world in the wind energy sphere"? What is this? Pro-wrestling?
Why does this nationalist nonsense have to come into something like windpower?

jump to top Anonymous says:

Wind Power here in Denver was CHEAPER than usual polluting XCEL power.........Colorado, New Mexico, and Minnesota are only states where you can call the Utility company and go 100% Wind Power........most Ski Areas in Colorado 100% wind Powered.........
www.Wind4me.com

jump to top Skibare says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads