most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Todd Bradley said: "Woo hoo! I had no idea this was coming, but I'm very excited about it. I just upgraded my iPhone to the new software last night. Now I can't wai..." [read]

luke said: "correct link: http://www.google.com/transit..." [read]

EcoLez08 said: "Thanks for the giggles. Too bad Treehugger was not a tad bit more inclusive and included same sex dolls...but oh well...." [read]

Dan Brockman said: "More research on the idea sounds good to me. As pointed out, there are possible downsides to nitrogen supplementation of forests, but we ma..." [read]

Soylent said: ""...which it is ONLY when compared to other meat sources, and only when it is domestically produced." As it should be. Most people want to ..." [read]

Graphic Of The Day: Romancing The Highways - A Half-Century History Of US Transit Funding

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 07.23.08
Cars & Transportation

cumulative government capital investment budget public transit highways graphic
Driving The Highway Budget Myth: The "Last Bastion Of Socialism In America"
For over 5 decades, US transportation projects have been budgeted based on a pair of myths: that public transit funding is an increasing drain on Federal and state highway budgets; and, a corollary, that fuel taxes cover the costs of highways and bridges. These mistaken beliefs feed hostility toward bicyclists and pedestrians who transgress on 'something we drivers pay for.' (Never mind that bicyclists and pedestrians often drive cars and trucks.) Via::Streetsblog, Highway Funding: The Last Bastion of Socialism in America . AND Delucchi Study Finds That U.S. Motorists Do Not Pay Their Way

Politics On Route 66 The politics, then, have been driven by a sentiment that the non-driving public somehow 'feeds out of the public trough'. Like public transit was some kind of welfare system.

Look again the graphic. As the decades passed, the slope of accumulating expenditures remained steep for highways and relatively flat and low for public transit. No indication of significant trade-offs between the two (at least at the national scale).

As for belief that drivers pay-as-they-go, based on fuel taxes:-

...in the U.S., current tax and fee payments to the government by motor-vehicle users fall short of government expenditures related to motor-vehicle use by approximately 20-70 cents per gallon of all motor fuel.
That would be before any proposed 'summer gas tax holiday,' as the McCain Presidential campaign has supported.

The facts support quite a different view than the myths. Public highway funding appears to have been by socialistic instincts: albeit for a majority public interest that also happened to create corporate wealth for both the car makers and the oil industry.

So...how do you overcome myths formed over a half-century?

Given: America is sufficiently fact-proof, these days, that no amount of graphics and peer reviewed study will make for a fast turnaround by elected officials.

Can a countervailing myth fill the disappearing chalice of Route-66? Widely held social myths take decades to change. Even "social networking," popular with only a minority of the populace, is not up to that task.

Money Talks
Only economic necessity can overcome the widely felt revulsion for being shoulder to shoulder with other humans and the attachment to vehicle as expression of personal freedom.

Public Outcry Can Make Politicians Walk
Intensive grass-roots lobbying could help, though. As our tipster points out:

the federal transportation funding bill is going to be coming up for reauthorization in 2009. I would suggest that U.S. enviros need to get focused on this. It's a big opportunity...

Comments (5)

When we run out of gas, the bicycling on those interstate highways is gonna be sweeettt....

jump to top rob says:

"Run out of gas"? Not gonna happen. When we run out of petroleum from the ground, we'll still have vehicles on the highways; maybe powered by half a dozen different sources (hydrogen, ethanol or even pressurized woodgas), but it will be a long, long time before all those highways are available for bicycling.
Unless we remove the gene(s) that allow humans to take pleasure in the misfortunes of others, or in owning goods/accessing services that others cannot, of course.

jump to top Perrin says:

uh... Does that graphic say that we spent 3 TRILLION Dollars on high ways and nearly 500 Billion dollars on transit in 2006? That seems high to me.

== author's response follows ===
It's a plot of cumulative expenditure, with each year added to the previous years sums. That is what makes it useful to illustrate the the impact of fund shifting (one to other category) is nil.

jump to top Dallas says:

I would like to see a graph that shows $ per user.
Hopefully, anyone that rides the bus counts against both, since the bus drives on roads.

jump to top Scott says:

uhh, those interstates require much oil to make/maintain....unless of course you would like to pull the paver with your bicycle :)

jump to top bake says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads