most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
SBean said: "How much energy is required to produce it? Market, transport, sell, purchase, etc.? If it costs 14.99, that's a reasonable number to work with. Wil..." [read]

Mark Piepkorn said: "Environmental Building News (where I work) reported on photoluminescent exit signs in 2006. With tens of millions deployed in North America ..." [read]

Migital Warfare said: "It's one thing to post a concise article detailing what happened with your trip, it's quite another to go on and on, venting about it. Save your wh..." [read]

AaronT said: "You could just vote with your wallet and not fly Air Canada. Instead of petitioning them, why not make a "AirCanadaHatesBikes.org" site and get ot..." [read]

Steve said: "Cup your hand and use your hands. No eco problems back in those days..." [read]

Competition for LCD: Better Image, A Lot Less Power

by Michael Graham Richard, Gatineau, Canada on 07.21.08
Science & Technology (electronics)

Telescopic Pixels photoImproving on LCD Screens
Apparently, LCD screens don't have much going for them except that compared to CRTs they are more power-efficient, and compared to other flat screen technologies they are less expensive. Their downsides are that the pixels do not turn completely off and take on average 25 to 40 milliseconds to switch between black and white (which can cause motion blur), they don't perform very well in bright ambient lights, they are complex (with three sub-pixels per pixel, each with its controlling transistor), and most importantly for us, only 5-10% of the light emitted by the LCD's backlight passes through the polarizing films, liquid-crystal layer, and the color filters to reach your eye.

Millions of Miniature Telescopes Staring You in the Face
Microsoft Research has published a paper in Nature Photonics about a new kind of monitor that could someday replace LCDs. Their 'telescopic' pixels (pictured under magnification on the left) use two micromirrors allowing them to switch completely on or off in 1.5 millisecond. Because they are so fast, you don't need 3 sub-pixels, reducing cost and complexity. But the best part is that about 36% of the light emitted by the backlight is getting through, making them potentially about 3.6 and 7 times more power-efficient than LCDs. But that's not all: Computer simulation show this could reach 56% with further design improvements. That would be up to 11.2 times better than LCDs!

How 'Telescopic Pixels' Work

Via Technology Review:

The new pixels use two tiny micromirrors to pass or block light. The first is a 100-micrometer-wide, 100-nanometer-thick aluminum disc with a hole in the center. The other mirror, also a thin aluminum film, is as big as the hole and placed directly in front of it. Light is projected on the disc-shaped mirror from behind the second mirror.

In the "off" state, both mirrors reflect light back to the source, so nothing comes out of the hole. In the "on" state, a voltage applied between the disc and a transparent electrode bends the disc toward the electrode. Now, light bounces off the disc toward the second mirror and then out through the hole.

MS Reasearch display technology image

All this aluminum is probably easier to recycle than the materials used in current LCD screens. LED backlighting could also make them greener, but we don't have details yet about what other materials are used.

Of course, this is still in the lab and other new screen technologies might beat it to market, but it is promising, especially considering how many computers and electronic devices have them. A big improvement in power-efficiency would make a difference, and if the image is better too, it shouldn't be hard to displace the old technology.

Green Computing and Electronics
CherryPal: A 2-Watt Computer the Size of a Paperback
Number of the Day: 11.8 Million
Saving Energy in Data Centers with Smart Sensors and Algorithms

More on Microsoft Research's New Display Technology
Technology Review: A New Competitor to LCD
New "telescopic pixel" displays could outperform LCD, plasma

Comments (8)

Prediction

A screen 6 foot high and either 8 foot wide or 12 foot wide (TV or Movie format) will become available in 5 to 10 years.

Should make watching TV and playing video games a lot more fun.

jump to top John Taylor [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

OLEDs will kill the idea.

jump to top mki says:

Where's my laser tv?

jump to top MarlboroTestMonkey7 says:

Correction:

"Apparently, LCD screens don't have much going for them except that compared to CRTs they are more power-efficient, and compared to other flat screen technologies they are less expensive."

Actually LCD screens use a lot less power than plasma screens. Still, this technology looks like it could be a substantial improvement.

jump to top Charlie [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Actually, most LCDs these days refresh anywhere from 4ms to under 20ms. This has been fueled by gamers and those needing fast refresh rates and sub-20ms (actually, it's lower than that) is the standard now.

Where did you guys dig up wrong information?

jump to top James W. says:

"Where did you guys dig up wrong information?"

It's in the technology review article referenced.

jump to top Anonymous says:

Actually, OLED and Laser look good, and not that far out, but OLED has been on deck forever. Surprisingly, Plasma must have gotten much more efficient, go look at the CNET power rankings of big screens: the LCDs don't win by much.

jump to top deconcoder [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

So how exactly will it achieve high contrast and deep blacks if it'll simply be a mirror when turned off?

jump to top Salty says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads