most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Steve said: "Cup your hand and use your hands. No eco problems back in those days..." [read]

Caitlin said: "It dissapoints me to see some of the posts by those who do not believe the truth about climate change. It is a researched confirmed fact that we ar..." [read]

said: "Please send price ranges for Prefab Houses..." [read]

pretty cheap jewelry said: "Yes, you are too far ahead of the mainstream with biodegradable. And in my opinion, it is not true to the idea of 'unconsuming'. Recycleab..." [read]

ecobore said: "trouble is it's too big! pesky UK plugtops!..." [read]

Ethanol And Construction Materials Made From Crop Residue Pose Fundamental Risks To Agriculture

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 07.18.08
Business & Politics (news)

WSU-kennedy-USDA-soil-scientist-photoModern Farming Methods Are Better Than Our Grandparents'
"No-till" or "low-till" cropping systems - increasingly common in large scale traditional agriculture - are superior because they consume less energy, build soil organic matter over time, sequester carbon, and greatly reduce soil and nutrient loss. (The old style moldboard plow behind the mule was actually terrible for the land: with soils deeply turned and broken up with several passes, leading to rapid soil loss and eventually productivity loss for the farm. Such primitive farming practices were a contributing factor to the Dust Bowl.)

Green Products Made With Crop Residues Can Compromise Long Range Food Productivity.
What happens when you scrape up most, or all, of the non-food portions of a crop, and make cellulosic ethanol or kitchen counter tops with it? Soil erodes at a faster rate and, over time, the organic content falls, leading to lower productivity. The latter issue is well described in a report by Washington State University, USDA-Agricultural Research Service soil scientist, Ann Kennedy.

Kennedy, whose current research is examining the composition of cereal crop residues and the amount of residue needed to maintain soil quality, said that in direct-seed or one- pass tillage systems at least a ton of residue per acre per year is needed to build soil organic matter over time. In these minimum tillage systems, the intact and slowly decomposing roots also add to organic matter. In fields with multiple tillage passes, every bit of residue is needed and even then, organic matter may not increase.

So...is wheat straw board a "green product". How about ethanol made from corn stover? Among other things, the answer depends on whether the demand created by a crop residue based product resulted in a significant reduction in post-harvest soil cover. It's a situational question. For an extensive discussion of the "caveats" have a look at this USDA white paper, Crop Residue Removal For Biomass Energy Production: Effects On Soils And Recommendations (streaming image version). Also available as a pdf download here.

What of organic farming systems that use the moldboard plow to turn soil completely? Do they cause long term loss of soil organic matter under certain condition? We will have to defer to the experts on that question.

One thing is certain. Farmers have their hands full stewarding the soils while producing our food. If we also require them to help build our kitchen cabinets and fuel our vehicles, something is going to fall by the wayside, and it's probably going to be our nation's agricultural productivity. It's a high risk public policy to push that on farmers. Calling something green does not make it better without a full life cycle risk management evaluation.

It would be interesting to hear what organic farmers have to say about this issue.

Via::WSU Today, Protecting the soil, Straw residue too valuable for biofuel. Image credit:WSU Today.

For more information about soil loss impacts:
Plowing's Dark Secret
Losing Soil
Organic Farming More Than Competitive
Shhhh, We've Got a Secret: Soil Solves Global Warming, Part 1 ...

Comments (3)

Thanks for laying out the complexities of the ethanol production system. Because of Bush's ridiculous ethanol-use mandate, former farmland that is now conservation land is threatened to be lost to corn production. See link below:

http://www.sierraclub.org/wildlegacy/blog/2008/07/conserved-lands-may-be-plowed-over-for.asp

jump to top Matt Kirby says:

Glad you're raising this issue.

jump to top jon says:

Are we talking about removing every scrap of biomass year after year after year or are we talking about three field crop rotation? I have never seen an assessment that says you can use plant stalks without rotating crops so I'm not surprised if this study is based on yearly removal of all parts of the plant.

=== author's response follows ===
Good point Pat.

Lots of variables to take in and they (the practices) will vary by region, climate, and soils association.

My concern remains that if the farmer is offered a second revenue stream for his/her stubble and stover and there is a feedstock price run up due to fuel shortages, that the soils will get ruined by some if not many farmers looking to cash in. A dangerous business.

jump to top Pat says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads