most popular:
Global Warming and War?



planet green: Home Improvement


most popular:
Un-TreeHugger Products


Energy Security Requires Diversifying Fuel Mix and Supply

by Marian Hopkins, Business Roundtable on 07.11.08
Business & Politics (news)

Business%20Roundtable%20log.jpg

Enhancing America’s energy security is one of our country’s most pressing challenges, and U.S. policymakers are facing increased pressure to come up with solutions. Here’s why:

As negotiations around the expiration of the Kyoto Protocol loom and both domestic and international economies continue to grow, worldwide energy demand is surging. Indeed, by 2025, worldwide demand for petroleum is expected to increase by 30 percent*.

Business Roundtable firmly believes that enhancing our energy security will require diversifying our fuel mix and increasing fuel supplies to meet the energy needs of the transportation sector. Investing 100 percent in renewable biofuels is not the answer. Relying on petroleum alone is not the answer. Our energy blueprint, released last year, outlined our belief that a more secure energy future requires the nation to aggressively pursue the following six parallel strategies:


  1. Continue the development and deployment of vehicle technologies that maximize fuel efficiency

  2. Increase domestic petroleum supplies

  3. Continue to build the domestic alternative fuels industry

  4. Develop non-conventional sources of hydrocarbon-based fuels, such as coal-to-liquids and oil shale

  5. Adopt government policies that slow the growth of fuel demand by reducing congestion, idling and the miles traveled per vehicle

  6. Pursue national security policies that seek to preserve the integrity of free markets, global energy trade and opportunities for robust foreign investment by the energy industry


General Motors (GM) is a real-life example of a Roundtable member company pursuing these strategies.

GM is committed to developing vehicle technologies that improve fuel efficiency and reduce overall consumption. By the end of the year, GM will offer eight hybrid models. GM’s domestic strategy is to save as many gallons of fuel as possible by applying hybrid technology to high-volume and high-fuel-consuming vehicles, like mass transit buses, full-size trucks and SUVs.

Cities like Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, P.A. and Minneapolis/St. Paul, M.N. are investing in this strategy to reduce their city’s mass transit environmental impact.

And the company continues to push technological innovation. Design and development work continue on the Chevrolet Volt, introduced at the 2007 North American International Auto Show in Detroit, powered by GM’s E-Flex electric propulsion system. The Volt has energized consumers in the U.S. and abroad with its potential to reduce or eliminate trips to the gas station for many commuters, as well as greatly reduce CO2 emissions. The E-Flex System is an all-electric vehicle architecture consisting of a common drivetrain system that uses electricity created and stored on-board the vehicle in a variety of ways.

The Chevrolet Volt extended-range electric vehicle (E-REV) uses electricity stored in a lithium-ion battery pack to power the wheels at all speeds. The electricity for the battery can be obtained by plugging the car into an electrical outlet to recharge the battery. Running off the battery, the vehicle operates as a battery-electric vehicle and provides 40 miles electric driving range. Because more than half of all Americans live within 20 miles of where they work (40 miles round trip), they may never use a drop of gas on their daily commute if they plug in their vehicle each night.
general-motors-volt-energy-oil-security.jpg

For longer trips, the Volt’s on-board engine-generator set (range-extender) powered by gasoline or E85 generates additional electricity to power the vehicle. A commuter who lives within 30 miles of work (60 miles round trip) and charges their vehicle every night or during the day at work could conceivably get up to 150 miles per gallon.

GM’s technological innovations are just one example of how Business Roundtable member companies are pushing the envelope to present innovative options to enhance our energy security.

While there is no “silver bullet” answer to achieving energy security, the pursuit of sound, steady government policies, strategic investments, and technological advancements driven by the free market will lead America on the way to a cleaner, more secure energy future.

And, in the end, isn’t that what we all want?

*U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information (EIA), Annual Energy Review, July 2006.

Comments (5)

meh. Not impressed.

The US would not be in the crisis we are in if we did not reward energy waste. This press release continues the tradition.

jump to top rob says:

1. Yes, please improve fuel efficiency—especially mass transit vehicles.

2. I don't know about increasing domestic supplies. that sounds like stockpiling, which comes with a host of international economic and political battles. If you meant increasing domestic sources, then I say less drilling and more American ingenuity.

3. Yes, or better yet get past the age of playing with fire and focus on energy sources that don't require burning stuff.

4. Most of these have serious environmental drawbacks, not the least of which is mining the raw material.

5. A great idea. The best way to reduce congestion? Reduce the number and size of personal vehicles on the road.

6. Preserve the integrity of free markets? Let's establish that integrity first through leadership by example: bring an end to subsidies.

jump to top Sheepguy42 [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Oh, come on. Increase domestic petroleum supplies? Sounds like somebody's getting kickbacks from the Big Oil lobby. Yeah, sure, you can allow drilling in ANWR and coastal waters, but it'll still be 20 years until anything goes online, and it still won't lower the global price of oil more than a couple of cents. Don't these people read the reports published by other branches of the same government? Sheesh.

I think electric vehicles are the future. They should stop trying to keep things as they are and embrace the change. Get rid of Big Oil and the biofuel lobby (that means you, Iowa), and start investing in Li-Ion technology.

jump to top Kimi says:

According to www.knoyd.com ("Drill and Mine US Oil--Buy and Refine US Oil!, copyright 2008),

US Energy Independence and Security comes from a three-fold mission:

The United States of America…

1. …has a divine destiny to defend democracy in every nation that currently embraces democracy, and promote democratic principles where tyranny and dictatorship runs supreme. This cannot be accomplished while the US is beholden to the very tyrants against whom it fights.

2. …has energy, whether from oil, bio-mass, coal, or nuclear power, as the life-blood of the US economy. The effects of skyrocketing fuel cost have a direct impact on the affordability of food, clothing, and shelter for every citizen, rich or poor. We must bring down the price of energy without further delay.

3. …energy policy plays a vital role in the creation of thousands and thousands of jobs. The oil shale fields alone can produce enough oil to replace our current imports and do so for 240 years. This is a minimum of 5 generations of employment for families in CO, UT, and WY. We have 250 years of coal supplies that can be converted to liquid fuel, and produce thousands of jobs.

It is time for liberal politicians to severe ties with ******, economy-wrecking, pseudo-environmental groups and begin to do what is in the best interest of the whole of the citizens of the United States. It is time for conservative politicians to stand and make a very vocal demand for energy independence and security. And it is time for every citizen to follow in the footsteps of Patrick Henry and declare that “Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.” (Patrick Henry, 1775, House of Burgesses)

jump to top knoyddotcom says:

I'd like to add to my above quote that i'm a long-suffering stockholder of a number of companies in the Industrial Roundtable, and I would be happier if they money they spent to support it were put into an occasional dividend. Ford drops 50% since I bought it. That's what you get for being patriotic.

jump to top rob says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)




th top picks