most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Ailsa Ek said: "What on earth is gained for society by treating people as interchangeable parts in a machine? Strongly agreed. We are more that jus..." [read]

Willy Bio said: "JC, Alec, "silly", "ijiot", "nincompoop", all used at one time or another by the one and only Bugs Bunny. If those terms so complet..." [read]

Peaceful Disorder said: "I am so happy to see the options on organic cotton products growing past just basic clothing. I look forward to the day when all cotton is organic..." [read]

Nudger said: "Vanno - based on hundreds of user-submitted stories and thousands of votes - agrees that Apple should rank low in environmental performance (despi..." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the suggestions listed is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is strapped beyond all experienc..." [read]

Airlines To Be Included in EU Emission Trading Scheme from 2012

by Matthew McDermott, Brooklyn, NY on 07. 8.08
Cars & Transportation (aviation)

View out of plane window photo
photo by Craig Forrester

In the ongoing effort to decrease greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector, the airline industry has been the focus of a good deal of criticism. Some airlines themselves have announced plans to reduce their environmental impact—Lufthansa, JAL, and Virgin Atlantic have all taken steps in this direction. Now comes word from the EU that government will at last partially dictate the pace of emissions reduction from aviation.

Airlines Must Reduce Emissions 3% In First Year
In a move which has predictably angered the airline industry, the European Union has overwhelmingly passed legislation which will include airlines in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme from 2012. Under the rule, airlines will have to cut CO2 emission by 3% in the first year, and by 5% from 2013. All airlines flying in and out of the EU will have to meet the reduction numbers.

Reuters quoted a spokesperson for the International Air Carriers Association voicing opposition to the plan: “Today’s vote creates the worst of all worlds—even more financial pressure on airlines without any proven benefits for the environment.”

Given that aviation generates 3% of all CO2 emissions in the EU and is expected to double in a bit more than a decade, and the potential impacts of global warming, I’m not sure how you can say that forcing airlines to reduce emissions isn’t a positive situation for the environment. And even if ticket prices are forced higher, that may in turn make rail travel seem even more attraction, another positive environmental move.

via :: Reuters

Aviation
Lufthansa to Increase Use of Biofuels in its Fleet, Slowly
Japan Airlines to Make Biofuel Test Flight
Virgin Atlantic Testing Biofuel on Jumbo Jet

Comments (1)

Seems to me that continued high petroleum prices with attendant high fares will have the effect of reducing the number of flights...so less CO2...the airlines may not have to do anything additional to meet CO2 requirements....we may have seen peak air travel, coincident with peak oil...DB

jump to top Dan Brockman says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads