most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Ailsa Ek said: "What on earth is gained for society by treating people as interchangeable parts in a machine? Strongly agreed. We are more that jus..." [read]

Willy Bio said: "JC, Alec, "silly", "ijiot", "nincompoop", all used at one time or another by the one and only Bugs Bunny. If those terms so complet..." [read]

Peaceful Disorder said: "I am so happy to see the options on organic cotton products growing past just basic clothing. I look forward to the day when all cotton is organic..." [read]

Nudger said: "Vanno - based on hundreds of user-submitted stories and thousands of votes - agrees that Apple should rank low in environmental performance (despi..." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the suggestions listed is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is strapped beyond all experienc..." [read]

Windpower Expansion Helps U.S. Manufacturing

by Matthew McDermott, Brooklyn, NY on 06.11.08
Business & Politics

Wind Turbines in Kansas
photo by Brent Danley via flickr

In case you needed a short example of what stability in renewable energy policy can do, not just in the alt. energy industry but for the wider economy, all you need do is look to what’s happening in manufacturing of wind turbine components.

According to the American Wind Energy Association, since 2005 US wind capacity has grown 150%. In 2007 alone the U.S. added a tad over 5,200 MW of wind capacity. This has been helped in large part by a stable policy environment. This growth has allowed local manufacturing of wind components to grow as well and by the end of this year it is expected that 50% of overall demand, and 90% of blade demand, can be met domestically. At the start of the period over 70% of wind components had to purchased overseas.

If the United States is to continue this level of growth, a stable regulatory environment is needed. In the same period I mentioned above (2007) European wind installation expanded by 8,300 MW. Again, spurred on by a generous and predictable program of renewable energy promotion.

The US Department of Energy estimates that for the US to generate 20% of its electricity from wind power current installed capacity will have to more than triple to 16,000 MW. While this undeniably will have a positive effect in terms of greenhouse gas emissions related to electricity, it will also have an economic multiplier effect in local economies if domestic manufacturing trends continue.

**CORRECTION**
As a commenter has very correctly pointed out, my math—well, properly the math of the article linked below—is massively wrong when it comes down to how much US wind installations will have to grow to meet 20% of US electric demand. According to the original DOE report which extrapolated demand out to 2030, "To meet 20% of [US energy demand] U.S. wind power capacity would have to reach more than...300,000MW." Yeah, a bit of a difference from the original figure.

The underlying point I was trying to make remains valid however. There is a link between growth of the U.S. renewables industry in general and wind in specific, a stable regulatory environment, and expansion of domestic manufacturing.

via :: Renewable Energy World Online

Renewable Energy Incentives
Renewable Energy Incentives Stalled In Senate
California May Tinker With Solar Subsidies
End The Perverse Incentives Effect On Renewable Energy

Wind Energy
Wind Power Produces 123% of Residential Demand in Rock Port, Missouri
Wind Energy Could Power All of Britain’s Homes By 2020
Cost of Wind Power Turbines Is SkyRocketing

Comments (5)

Your math is a trifle off, sadly.
In 2005, total generating capacity in the US was
1,067,019 megawatts (MW), or 1067 GW.
To make 20%, wind needs
about 200,000MW (200GW). At 16000MW, you could round
up to get to 2%, not 20%.

jump to top Jim Grier says:

Thanks for correcting me on this Jim.

Pluses and minuses. Cleaner enery generatino means that big Pharma will have fewer lung disease patients to sell drug to, so fewer job at the pill packing plant.

jump to top j.blit says:

FURTHER CLARIFICATION
I contacted the author of the original article I linked to and found out that the 16,000MW increase in installations would occur annually until 2030 to meet the 20% figure cited in the DOE report. My mistake. Hope this sorts this one out for people.

I took a double take at that "Triple for 20%" too. I thought to myself, Holy crap! When those production lines open, we could triple our current power in 3 years. Now it looks more like 30 years, which makes more sense.

jump to top Dallas says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads