Renewable Energy & Transmission Focus of Senate Hearing

by Matthew McDermott, New York, NY on 06.17.08
Business & Politics

Electric Towers at Sunset
photo by Patrick Boury

The US Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee today held its first ever hearing focusing exclusively on renewable energy and transmission. Testifying on behalf of the wind industry was Don Furman, president-elect of the American Wind Energy Association, and Senior Vice President of Iberdrola Renewables.

Furman sums up the state of US electrical transmission, “Like any infrastructure, the U.S. transmission grid is aging and needs upgrading to function reliably and to meet future load requirements. At the same time, the nation has tremendous renewable energy reserves, but the existing electric transmission system was not designed to tap these new kinds of generation. The good news is that we have the opportunity to solve both problems at once.”

Key Points of Furman's Testimony
Lack of sufficient transmission capacity is not only a threat to reliability it increases the price of electricity. Transmission congestion can constrain the ability of utilities to access the cheapest electric sources, which may not be those closest at hand.

Investment it transmission capacity is expensive at the beginning but consumers ultimately will save money. Citing an estimate by the Midwest Independent System Operator, Furman stated that an investment that would allow wind energy generated in North and South Dakota to be brought to New York City would cost $13 billion to build but ultimately would result in an annual saving at the consumer level of $600 million per year.

Investment is transmission has benefits beyond monetary savings for the consumer: reduction of electric section greenhouse gas emission by 25%; potential reduction of natural gas in electric generation by 50%; increased local annual revenues of $1.5 billion; creation of approximately 500,000 jobs.

20% from Wind Power by 2030
Furman claimed that the biggest constraint in the US reaching the milestone of generating 20% of its electric production through wind power by 2030—a figure the US Department of Energy says is achievable—is limitations in the transmission system.

via :: AWEA

Electric Transmission
Wind Farms in Texas Expand, Will Transmission Capacity be There?
Superconducting Cables Beat Back NIMBY
Don’t Touch Those Trees You TreeHuggers!
Connecting the World’s Wind Farms

Follow @TreeHugger on Twitter & get our headlines with @TH_rss!

Comments (4)

So ... why not build a string of wind machines and then attach transmission wires to them?

Towers is towers. Why build two when you can build one?

jump to top John Taylor [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Yes, of course the turbines need to be grid connected. The problem is that extra capacity is needed for getting the power from the turbines' part of the grid to distant parts of the country.

jump to top Anthony [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Um, when the windmill rotates so it's facing into the wind, getting tangled in the transmission wires is probably a bad idea ... although I suppose you could put them below the lowest point of the arc.

But that isn't the problem. The problem is that the current transmission lines lose a huge amount of energy just carrying it around. High voltage AC is not very efficient. High voltage DC apparently works much better which is odd because low voltage DC (like you get from a PV panel) is very inefficient which is why you want your inverter as close to the panels as practical.

jump to top Plugh [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

@ Anthony .. the concept seems so logical yet so few seem to understand it.

For getting the power from the wind turbines' part of the grid to distant parts of the country, we just build a sequence of wind turbines from the wind farm all the way into the city, and string wires on them like they were transmission towers. This is double land use and double tower use, and produces energy.

Some complain that the transmission corridor is not the "best" wind location, but these places are still quite good, and any shortfall in average wind can be overcame by slightly larger blades. Wind is free.

Just think how much energy could be generated if every telephone pole and electrical pole and transmission tower had a wind turbine on top of it.

jump to top John Taylor [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)




th top picks