th comments
Mark Kiernan said: "I am truly touched by the great work people are doing around the world for the sake of the Earth and for Animals. It breaks my heart when I hear t..." [read]

Progressive Penguin said: "Hostility. I deeply and sincerely hope that Phoenix, Zap, Tesla and others bury GM and Ford. I will dance a jig and shoot off firecrackers..." [read]

Dan A said: "There are other issues for why diesel never picked up in the US, including much stricter emissions standards (making difficult and expensive to mak..." [read]

David Magda said: "Personally I don't think Ford buyers and VW buyers are the same demographic, but that's just me...." [read]

Charlie said: "Bravo to NMK for answering the questions. I don't like the artificial vanillin, but on the scale of things I might complain about in this world th..." [read]

Biofuel Crop Expansion Will Destroy Important Kenyan Coastal Wetland

by Matthew McDermott, Brooklyn, NY on 06.23.08
Science & Technology

Tana River Delta, Kenya
image courtesy of Vrije Universiteit Brussel

A recently approved plan by the Kenyan government to expand sugarcane cultivation for biofuels in the Tana River Delta will devastate this important coastal wetland, according to The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. The plan calls for more than 80 square miles of wetland to be destroyed and replaced with sugarcane plantations.

Wildlife and Human Livelihoods Threatened
At risk is refuge area for 350 species of birds, lion, elephants, sharks and reptiles, as well as important dry-season cattle grazing area for local farmers. A study undertaken by RSPB and Nature Kenya found that the ecological benefits provided by the delta “defied valuation” and the plan would cause “irreversible loss” of ecosystem services such as flood prevention, carbon sequestration and provision for traditional medicines and food.

Environment Assessment of Plan "Poor"
According to Paul Matiku, executive director for Nature Kenya, “The environmental assessment for the scheme was poor yet the government has defied even those very modest recommendations. We refuse to accept that this decision is final. The development must be stopped at all costs.”

Project Income Less Than Loss of Ecosystem Services
Income for the sugarcane cultivation is projected to be £1.25 million over the next 20 years, but the RSPB/Nature Kenya report reports that loss of revenue from farming, fishing and tourism could be as high as £30 million in the same period.

With it’s headwaters on Mount Kenya and discharging into the Indian Ocean near Kipini, at over 1000km long, the Tana River is the longest in Kenya.

Apart from the ongoing discussion on a number of fronts of the wisdom of expanding first generation biofuels production, this seems a perfect instance illustrating the failings of conventional economics to account for ecological services. Isn't it time yet for Ecological Economics?

:: The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
:: Nature Kenya

Biofuels from Sugarcane
Sweet! Sugarcane is Australia’s New Renewable Energy
Brazilian Biofuel Threatened By Insect Pest
Brazil’s Lula Rebuffs Biofuels Critics at World Food Summit

Comments (3)

I don't like biofuels. At all... I'm into the more direct solution for air quality. SOLAR PANELS

jump to top Anonymous says:

That's horrible. Kenya is a beautiful country, and destroying wetlands won't help. Why not try solar power? Africa is well known for being super-sunny, and solar panels would be more effective, than producing crops for fuel.

Biofuels are starting to look less green every day. If you have to destroy good land for some fuel, it's almost as bad as fossil fuels.

jump to top quikboy [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

this is terrible. thanks for this post.

jump to top zaxxon [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads