most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Willy Bio said: "Well, Mr. Smarty, by your own admission, you already have. So please, enlighten us...." [read]

Cinthesooner said: "I also like anything by Marion Nestle- especially "What to Eat" and "Food Politics". If you ever get a chance to see her speak- please do- she is ..." [read]

Anthony said: ""...bettered only by Norway's legendary farmed salmon, where .95 kilos of food get a kilo of flesh." Um... unless they eat a lot of fatty f..." [read]

Eric Dewhirst said: "@ Bob and others - Throwing stones at Wal-Mart is like blaming your parents - it get's you nowhere. I am sure that Wal-Mart is fully aware that th..." [read]

Marcial said: "Don't know about portable devices but it would be cool if you could just stick them to your house windows or the roof or your car and get enough po..." [read]

California May Tinker With Solar Subsidies

by Matthew McDermott, Brooklyn, NY on 06. 9.08
Business & Politics

sanfran_solarpanel_01.jpg

What if you finance it and they don’t come? Or come late? Forgive the shaky baseball reference, but that’s just what is going on with the California Solar Initiative.

The San Francisco Business Times is reporting that 12.8 percent of people who qualified for incentives under the $3.3 billion dollar solar financing program have failed to begin construction within the first twelve months and forfeited their incentive funds in the process. The result is that $9 million which would have gone toward promoting solar energy adoption is stranded in the system.

According to the program regulations as currently constructed the unclaimed wattage is made available to other applicants while the incentive money is not. Because rebate money decreases as the program ages and more wattage has been allocated, those people who wish to reapply after the window to begin construction has closed will not be able to receive as much funding in the second go around.

The article quotes Molly Tirpak Sterkel, California Public Utilities Commission program supervisor, as saying “We are actually looking at the problem to see if it’s a problem.” Looking at the problem? To see if it’s a problem? The fact that $9 million in renewable energy incentives is tied up in bureaucracy is obviously a problem. A loophole that only will expand as time goes on has to be taken seriously.

If the goal of the program is to help more California houses go solar, then structural problems which are essentially paperwork need to be corrected. As time goes on and incentive levels fall, people who got burned because they failed to start construction will become increasingly less likely to want to apply for the program again.

via :: San Francisco Business Times

photo by jfraser via flickr.

Comments (1)

If the San Francisco Business Times had run it under the title: Close to 90% of people who qualified for incentives under the $3.3 billion dollar solar financing program have started work, many have finished and are now producing green power.
Would that Mr Brown hadn't cut the grants for solar and wind power in the UK...

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads