most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Jessica said: "One more reason to use a compact portable nebulizer. It uses batteries, but we use rechargeables (three asthmatics in the home)...." [read]

Shane said: "Apparently someone didn't look too far for good reusable bottles. Guyot Design makes a few different stainless steel waterbottles, most hav..." [read]

Andy said: "I still use my road racing bike nearly every day, since there are rarely days when snow and ice are actually on the roads here in upstate NY. On th..." [read]

K_Dogg said: "I think I just found a new black market product...." [read]

Kelly said: "IT's ok... my optimal place is out in lake ontario... better get on building me one of those floating hover homes......" [read]

Broadstar AeroCam Wind Turbine

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 06.10.08
Science & Technology (alternative energy)

broadstar%20aerocam%20wind%20turbine.jpg

This Broadstar's AeroCam turbine design (pictured) is a head-turner. We can't describe it any better than our source:

[the] new design is based on principles first established by the French aeronautical engineer Georges Jean Marie Darrieus (1888-1979), who invented a wind turbine capable of operating from any direction and under adverse weather conditions. Darrieus machines typically have a vertical axis, whereas the AeroCam design has a horizontal axis with multiple blades, giving it the appearance of a water wheel. The major innovation in the design, however, is the ability to automatically and interactively adjust the pitch or angle of attack of the aerodynamic blades as the turbine rotates, thereby optimizing its performance for much the same reasons a bird changes the shape of its wing in flight.

The Broadstar website page for media downloads has some very helpful depictions of how the device might be integrated into conventional windfarms, on building roofs, and so on.

Via::Energy Daily, BroadStar Achieves Breakthrough In Low-Cost Energy Production With New Generation Wind Turbine Image credit::Broadstar

Comments (12)

Windmills on power lines...it's the perfect place for them.

jump to top Anonymous says:

I see drawings, not a model that works.

This is complex and looses the one benefit of the Darrieus design, that of taking advantage of gusting winds.

How much for a unit? How much per kW?
Do you have any of these made and working?

jump to top John Taylor [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Right. This is a paper design, with many problems and hurdles, without even a working prototype.

Problems for them to solve: Mechanical stability - their SketchUp drawings fails the structural sniff test (no outside support for the blades on the twin model, no support between blades, the members are incorrectly sized, no detail showing how they prevent the blades flexing). Functionally, they show noting or the blade control mechanism, no generator details, no info about how the front blade's turbulence affects the rear blades. There are v. good reasons why VAWT have only 3 blades.

Worse HAWT are generally less efficient than VAWT.

This a a start up paper company hooping to cash in on the wind energy crazy. Just look at their management team.

jump to top j.blit says:

Isn't this just a horizontal-axis Cycloturbine?

jump to top M.Anderson says:

The above astute observations are well -appreciated. Especially revealing are the qualifications of the CEO as being a "Serial Entrepreneur" with "a proven track record of being in the right place at the right time".

jump to top Scott says:

Guys they displayed a model at WINDPOWER 2008. Not everyone out there in the small wind market is a fraudster, so let's evaluate before we dismiss. I hope to see the idea work.

jump to top Preston says:

Not everyone is a fraudster, but certainly these people are. I challenge them to put their "model" in a 30 MPH wind and stand down wind. I'll stand upwind and watch the blade twist off their supports.

I hope that all the energy savings ideas work, but there is a world of difference between sound engineering based on sound science, and con men peddling rubbish.

jump to top j.blit [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Yeah, thats a great idea - let's take a darrieus turbine and flip it to horizontal, so it loses all the advantages of the vertical axis eg no need for a high mast, no need to turn it to the direction of the wind, possibility of having all the serviceable components close to the ground level etc - It's like a hybrid car that uses electricity to generate fuel for its ICE (patent pending)

jump to top Veiko says:

These "paddle wheel" designs suffer from enourmous drag incured from the necessary supports and mounts. Plus the cam idea, which optimally "aims" the blades into the wind, goes back to the 1800's, and always fails due to vibrations and friction. And, as others have noted, the high drag and light frame will collapse in a windstorm. The only positive feature, common to all four or more blade windmills, is better efficiency at low velocities- but always at the cost of poorer efficicency in high winds.

Seductive modeling is a poor substitue for engineering experience.

jump to top gregb says:

Hi everyone,

I would like to clear up some misconceptions about Broadstar and the Aerocam turbines.

There have been 4 Aerocam prototypes in total. The first two prototypes were a working proof of concept model and a fully instrumented 6ftx 6ft working prototype. The 6x6 working prototype exceeded projected power output and survived 60mph winds. It has been around a long time and is still used on occasion for various data collection and analysis. It has been successfully run at angular velocities that it would reach in winds exceeding 60mph

There have been two additional prototypes built since then, both in Type 1 configuration. They are the display model seen at the Windpower 2008 convention and a similar unit for research and development use by the engineering staff. It is important to note that these two turbines are prototypes, not beta, pre-production or production models.

The two Type 1 prototypes are 10ft in diameter and 16ft in length. The addition of generators increases overall length to just shy of 20ft. The Type 1 is mounted on a horizontal axis to take advantge of the air flow over the pulpit of a building wall. The type 1 is designed to mount on the roof tops of commercial buildings in an urban or rural environment, not on stand alone towers or the roof tops of typical homes.

Each Type 1 prototype currently uses two Gin Long PM5k generators. The generators are mounted on opposing ends. These genertors are for prototype testing.

The CGI in the downloadable videos is an artists rendering only. The images in these videos should not be considered as the actual structural design.

Projected pricing targets are as follows:

10kw machine = $2.50/w
100/250/500kw machie = $1.00/w

As with any new product there are hurdles to be overcome and the Aerocam machines are no exception. However, many aspects of these machines that appear to be criticl issues are not, and many of those that do not appear to be critical issues are.

Unfortunately, in most cases a product is judged on it's appearence rather than the thought process, performance or science behind it's design. This is because those aspects of product are not readily discernable. We will never know all of the "Why's?" so we often fall back on our preconceived notions to use as a basis for understanding and comparison... the problem being that our preconceived notions are mostly based on evidence no stronger than what we have seen in the past, what we have been told, or the first tig that comes to mind. Unless we are involved in the entire process the best we can do is guess as to what is really going on.

My respect and regards,

Chris S

jump to top Chris S says:

I actually did a live interview with the founder of Broadstar Steve Else at wind power 2008, you can check that out here if you like. He was a great guy and very passionate about their new AeroCam. BTW i did see an assembled 10kw unit at the show In fact i have video of it on the site further down.

http://mattgoesgreen.com/windpower-2008/

about half way down the page.

jump to top Matt says:

I recently ran across this.

http://www.emailwire.com/release/16515-JC-Penney-Announces-Solar-and-Wind-Power-Projects-with-SunPower-Corp-and-Broadstar-Wind-Systems-.html

J. C. Penney is going to install these and solar panels on some of their stores. I am very interested to see how this design works.

jump to top Scott says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads