most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Dr. Gregory House said: "This is a brilliant idea. 60lbs is not heavy for an electric bike. Those who think this is too heavy should go back to sanding paint off their bicy..." [read]

Jennifer said: "Very stylish! I definitely can see myself riding this to work...." [read]

Jay Fretz said: "If "The motors do not drive the car, but kick in to provide a power boost...", then how can "Range on electric alone is expected to to be in the or..." [read]

Jay said: "Sad story indeed. Unless we get the good fortune of offspring, Man will have yet again driven a species to extinction. Something it seem to be ve..." [read]

said: "OK, why isn't the option of voting to NOT tax gas guzzlers? There can be no shift to more fuel efficient vehicles unless more fuel efficient vehic..." [read]

Leviathan Powers Your Home With Every Flush

by Karin Kloosterman, Jerusalem, Israel on 05.12.08
Business & Politics (news)

pump%20leviathan%20treehugger%20israel%20toilet%20electricty.jpg

Hydroelectric power is generated when moving water passes through turbines. Why stick to water in rivers says Leviathan Energy, a Delaware-incorporated company with R&D in Israel. Water moving through the sewer system could work too! Some extreme TreeHuggers let yellow water mellow, but with Leviathan’s Benkatine Turbine you can feel less guilty –– by generating power with every flush of the toilet.

leviathan%20pump%20flush%20recycle%20water.jpg

We spoke with the company’s CEO Daniel Farb yesterday (he’s been overwhelmed with queries) and were blown away by the number of cleantech inventions this former ophthalmologist has created to harness energy from the oceans, waste water and wind. According to Wired, Leviathan’s scalable turbine could be installed on a municipal system, or fitted to your own toilet to make use of the potential power just running down your drain.

463_gavin%20newsom%20daniel%20farb%20treehugger%20picture%20image%20pic.jpg
(San Fran Mayor Gavin Newsom and Leviathan's Dr. Daniel Farb)

Earlier we mentioned that Mayor Gavin Newsom was in Israel last week meeting with cleantech companies. One of those companies was Leviathan, who was in San Fran earlier this year. Will Americans be the first to power their homes with every flush? Could be. We do know that Leviathan is in serious talks with a small US-based cleantech company to provide an in-pipe turbine in the company’s hydro-electric solution.

via ::Wired
via ::Leviathan Energy

For more toilet talk on TreeHugger:

Bidets: Eliminate Toilet Paper, Increase Your Hygiene
The Hot Poop on Toilet Design in the Developing World
Dual Flush Toilet by Caroma
Pee-Cycling: Green Toilet Idea From Olde Europe

Comments (22)

How do you clean that clog out?

jump to top Anonymous says:

It should be noted that this is merely recovering energy that was used to pump the water up to pressure in the first place. It might be more effective to reduce water use in the first place, if this [probably] modest amount of energy is of concern.

jump to top Liam O'Brien says:

I love the idea of a turbine in our sewer system. If they can fix the problem of solid waste, this could reclaim energy spent on pumping the water. Every KW counts.

jump to top Brian says:

What a great idea! I soooo want one in my home now! Another way to use "waste"d energy :)

jump to top mikebeavis says:

Might work in larger diameter sewer lines. In smaller lines it's just a massive clog waiting to happen.

Horizontal sewer line runs are pitched precisely so all water and materials run downhill without depositing any solids in the line. Any narrowing or interruption of the flow eventually leads to big, costly repairs.

Maybe putting it on the fill lines could be helpful. Some faucets already use piezoic energy of running water to power faucet lights or automatic IR valves.

jump to top jon says:

Considering the fact that the outflow from the Los Angeles Hyperion Water Treatment Plant is the 4th largest river in California, it makes sense.

jump to top jimmy says:

How many watts (or milliwatts) of electricity produced per flush? Now factor in the amount of energy needed to produce it, install it and maintain it. How much CO2 will the plumber's truck emit the first time it plugs up?
See where I'm going here?
We need solutions, not impractical little novelties.

jump to top scott says:

It's like powering a fan to drive another fan to produce power. The drag this thing would generate in a sewer line would create an increase in power consumption by pumps.

jump to top Nick says:

Doesn't make too much sense economically. Anyway, water runs through my shower more often than through my toilet. How about installing it there without electrocuting me? Or, put in on the water line coming into the house so that it spins whenever a tap is opened?

jump to top steve says:

As soon as someone pinches a bog loaf, it will clog the potty and Mr Plumber will be called in to take it out.

While it "works" in theory, no one wlll want to risk the disaster that impends from actually putting it in. In other words, it will never happen on a mass scale.

jump to top John Laumer says:

Yes, every kW helps. However, this will NEVER produce a kW, or even a sizable fraction of that. This has to be just about the worst payoff in $/kW idea. Ever. Clearly purchased by people who are bad at math and engineering.

jump to top KZ says:

Sewer line intallation seems pretty silly as everyone here notes. How about rain water drainage? Big buildings collect a lot of clean rainwater and typically have drainage pipes already installed. Still an awfully intermittent source of power, but we may develop the need soon anyway.

***

Editor's note:
Rain water is an excellent idea.

jump to top Keith Jackson says:

God, this is stupid.

jump to top Willy Bio says:

When this device first came across my desk at work I went to the web site and was immediately clued into the fact that the developers have either never actually installed one of these on a toilet, measured the electricity produced and then suggested something to do with that electricity (trickle charge a battery is all i can think of) or won't report the results.

The news media tend to take an inventor's publicity and immediately translate that into an assumption that they've actually tested the device and analyzed it's performance.

These folks are fishing for development funds when they apparently do not have sufficient confidence to pay for development themselves.

Other posters have noted the problems with the technology.
Flush toilets and sewer systems operate on gravity. Reduce that potential energy and you'll end up either with clogs or a need for increased pumping. And if you're still using a 20 litre toilet, replace it with an HET.

jump to top WaterConsNYC [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Every KW does not count. Only the ones that are cost effective count.

In addition to the other accurate criticism, the energy recovery is miniscule. There is a reason lake Mead is so big.

Assuming 100% efficiency, no friction loss, and that you flush 1000 liters (aprox 250 US gallons) per day, and you turbine is say 10 m below the toilet, the max energy recovery per day is .0277 KWh, or 28Wh. Think a fridge light bulb for 1 hour.

If you flush a more believable 10x a day (40 liters) you could recover no more than about 0.5 a Watt Hours. To run a 20 Watt lamp for a hour, you'd have to flush for 40 days. Better to burn the poop and recover the energy.

BTW, we are talking 50 milliWatts hours per flush. Better to but a dynamo on the fllusher and make the users press very hard.

***
Editor's note:
The company has developed a "new" kind of turbine, folks. I hope to get them online to explain it a little better in the future.

jump to top james blit says:

Is it a "magic" turbine? The kind that defies the laws of physics?

***
Editor's note:
We can all use a little magic in our life, now and again.

jump to top Rebel says:

It would probably make more power if you put it on the roof and let the wind blow it

jump to top Scott_T says:

if they have developed a new type of turbine, why not just use it in places that turbines are already used today?

jump to top Anonymous says:

As others noted this will block lines with solid wastes.

Much more energy used to heat water than pump it and it's easier to recover. There are already commerical heat recovery devices that you put on the drain of your sinks and showers but they require spot on-demand water heaters. They can recover almost half the heating energy.

jump to top Ugly American says:

I agree with what Keith Jackson said about attaching it or more than one to the drain pipes and water reclamation pipes that office building and skyscrapers have to collect rainwater. On a very rainy day it could produce a lot of electricity.

jump to top Everett Malaguti says:

Hook one up to the downspouts and generate power from rain too.

jump to top RW says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads