Rebirth of the Producer
by Jerry Stifelman, The Change, Chapel Hill, NC
on 04.13.08

The number of companies that actually make their own products is dwindling. Manufacturing, especially as it pertains to consumer products like shoes and textiles, has been reduced to an exercise in outsourcing. It's not uncommon for competing products to actually be made in the same factories. The result is that brands have become disconnected from the processes that create the products they represent.
How a product is made should be a critical point of difference from its competition. But it no longer is -- unless you're a green, ethically-conscious company.
Six months ago, my colleagues and I were invited to participate in the Walmart CEO Sustainability Summit. In attendance were CEO's from companies whose products are sold (or under consideration for sale) by Walmart. Almost every attendee we met referred their company as a "supplier." Hardly anyone used the term "manufacturer". This is because they don't manufacture anything. Instead, like most name-brand suppliers of consumer goods, they engage in short-term contracts with third-party production facilities, the vast majority of which are in the developing world, often operating to significantly lower environmental and labor standards. Contracts tend to be short-term because companies want to maintain the flexibility to switch to an even lower-cost manufacturer – and as a result, suppliers have little leverage to impose, monitor or enforce environmental or labor standards on their contract facilities. I suspect that this is part of the reason why WalMart's sustainability efforts have so far focused more on how a product is packaged and transported, rather than on how it is manufactured. This is not to say such efforts are not welcome or genuine, but that Wal-Mart has chosen for now to concentrate its efforts on in ways that neither challenge nor modify this contract-manufacture business model.
However, if you are a genuinely mission-driven green and ethical company, you can't turn a blind eye to how your products are made. Instead, you need to actually manufacture your own goods, or at least exert far greater controls over your contract sources. This makes you different from conventional companies — and being different is at the core of effective branding -- provided, that is, you effectively communicate these points of differences to your customers.
Yet I'm continually surprised how few companies do this. Usually, issues of manufacturing are either un-addressed entirely, relegated to the farthest navigational reaches of a corporate web site or buried in the arcane language of a CSR Report (don't get me started on the readability of CSR reports!). In all fairness, it's challenging to translate this kind of information into accessible language and it is easy to shrug off the exercise entirely by dismissing it as an issue that no one's interested in. But the fact is that people -- people in the mainstream, not just treehuggers -- care about the way their product is made, as long as the information is expressed to appeal to their existing values. Recent media attention to controversies in Chinese toy making, fish-farming and pharmaceuticals are only increasing people's interest in how their goods are made.
And the differentiation is not just about product quality. Abstract, disconnected supply chains present a nightmare for anyone trying to figure out the true environmental impact of their products. The more you control the process, the more you can improve the process. So take time to view your production process in its entirety - even hire someone to undertake a full life cycle analysis - and then use that knowledge to both improve your environmental performance, and communicate your responsible attitude to consumers. The fewer times you have to say "I don't know" in response to a customer question, the closer you'll be to sustainability.
Here are some suggestions for communicating these issues.
1. Distill your best practices into a series of simple points accompanied by deeper explications. This way, the typical customer can see at a glance the things that set you apart -- and activist consumers and members of the media can read the details. As well, simply seeing that you've taken the time to express the details lets someone know that you're serious about transparency.
2. Link your practices to your company mission. Too often, mission statements are exercises in irrelevant communication. If you're one of the rare companies that practices what you preach, let people know it.
3. "Roadblock" key points. By this, I mean don't just express them in one place. Communicate them prominently on your web site, on consumer packaging, on shipping materials (i.e., corrugated cases), in the boilerplate of all press releases, as the focus of a press backgrounder etc. The idea is to ensure that people are exposed to the information -- and, ideally, to give people multiple exposures to the information. The more someone encounters this communication, the more it becomes a part of your brand.
4. Keep the media honest. It's difficult for reporters to research manufacturing conditions at source. If you read something that you suspect doesn't tell the whole truth, contact the writer with your information -- be prepared to back up your claims with documents, photography, video and the contact information for others who can expand on your information.
5. Be transparent. If you're green and good, information is power. If your competitors are making compromises to keep their costs down, for them, information is dangerous. Use this disparity to your advantage.
6. Make the most of non-profit resources. If you have interests in common with environmental and human rights groups, you should work with them. Co-sponsorship, campaigning together, and becoming more of an "activist brand" can both increase your visibility and credibility among customers -- and enable you to expand and enforce best practices among competitors. When your conventional competition tries to put a positive spin about their own practices, your non-profit partners can help expose manipulations of the truth. That way you become an agent for change, not just within your own operations, but across your whole market sector – setting you apart as a leader while simultaneously raising the bar for those who come behind. And that's when the real change happens…
Jerry Stifelman is founder and creative director of The Change, a brand-strategy and design agency that works exclusively with companies and organizations that make the world more sustainable, equitable or authentic. To view his previous posts on the ins and outs of green branding and marketing, follow this link.
Image credits: Oxfam Australia and People Tree.
Follow @TreeHugger on Twitter & get our headlines with @TH_rss!
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- Reduce Your Carbon Footprint by Half in Three Steps
- Eat a Vegetarian Diet, Reduce Your Carbon Footprint by a Ton
- Mister Miyagi's Guide to Going Green: 5 Questions to Always Ask to Think Green and Be Green
- 6 Sinful Summer Street Foods, 6 Deliciously Green Alternatives
- French Pressed Coffee: A Surprisingly Green Luxury, On the Cheap
- Trust Stella McCartney: Meat-Free Mondays are Hip, not Hippie!



































Jerry, your post was both insightful and informative. I must say that TreeHugger is my favorite resource to use when researching sustainability news. I commend you on this latest post of yours regarding green business practices. I recently posted on my own blog about the negative consequences of greenwashing, a term I am sure you are familiar with. What I liked most about your post was how you chose not to focus on the negatives that exist out there, but rather on the positive changes that companies can make to be truly sustainable. It is easy to criticize and throw blame, but it is much more difficult to offer real and practical solutions as you have done here. Nevertheless, everything that you suggest seems incredibly simple and straightforward. It makes me wonder why more businesses have not chosen to adopt these methods. Will we ever see the day when businesses put a green priority above a profit priority? I guess the better question is: will companies ever stop seeing the two as separate and incompatible facets of the industry? To me, employing sustainable practices does not necessarily mean a loss in profits or an increase in expenditure. Even if it were the case that more money would have to be spent to convert to greener methods, it seems to me that consumers these days are more interested in seeing honest businesses that produce safe and well made products and that alone would be enough to increase profits and make up for any extra costs acquired. Am I being overly optimistic when I say that?
Another reason I enjoyed reading your post is because I am planning on entering the realm of public relations upon graduation. It was really interesting to look at your suggestions from a PR perspective and you truly do offer some very good advice. "I don't know" is probably one of the worst things a publicist can say because it is precisely their job to know everything about the company they work for. I definitely agree that the less that phrase is used, the better for all parties involved. However, it is troubling how businesses with even the most microscopic and immaterial green practices seem to tout it as one of their major platforms. I find it frustrating when being "eco-friendly" is more of a marketing ploy than a sincere attempt at helping the environment. What is perhaps even more irksome is the fact that as consumers, it is so easy to be misled. Companies publicize every green detail about themselves but never openly discuss any of their less sustainable actions. Ideally, there would be complete transparency, as you discuss in suggestion number five. However, we don't live in an ideal world and the truth is constantly being obscured by irrelevant facts that are meant to distract us from the reality of the situation. Do you actually know of any companies or corporations that follow all of your steps? As of right now, I cannot think of a single business or manufacturer that does so in the United States. Do you think the day of the truly open and honest big business will ever arrive? I myself remain skeptical but hopeful.