most popular:
66 Gas Saving Tips



most popular:
7 Best Electric Scooters


th comments
H20CarChick said: "I have been trying to ascribe by the "two mile" rule: Anything under 2 miles, I hoof or bike it. I also downgraded by truck 2 years ago to a Volks..." [read]

Charlie Wildish said: "It is good to see the Chinese taking these measures. I read a few years ago that some cities in China have Environmental Committees, which will ac..." [read]

Jillian said: "I the woman's question at the end implying that she thinks wouldn't be responsible if she hit him while backing out of the driveway reveals the l..." [read]

Richard said: "China is also making massive investments in public transit and high-speed rail that should put us to shame. We are so far behind and getting furthe..." [read]

Uncle Mike said: "I have no interest in dealing with Walmart, and thier beat the price down every possible cent way of doing business, besides the fact that there is..." [read]

New Standard for Beauty, Personal Care Industry Launches

by Jasmin Malik Chua, Jersey City, USA on 03. 5.08
Fashion & Beauty

oasis-beauty.jpg

No thanks to the gaping loopholes in public-health laws, cosmetics companies have had free reign to use any ingredient they want in their products, from sunscreen to baby shampoo, without any restrictions or requirements for safety testing. In fact, nearly 90 percent of the 10,500 personal-care-product ingredients known to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have not been evaluated for safety by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review, the FDA, or any other publicly accountable institution, according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG).

Organic And Sustainable Industry Standards (OASIS), the first organic standard for the U.S. beauty and personal-care market, wants to bring you some peace of mind, especially when it comes to organic product claims, which can get confusing as more companies resort to greenwashing to sell their wares.

With the support of 30 founding members—including Aveda, Earth Mama Angel Baby, Nature's Baby, Perfect Organics, and Suki—OASIS was formed in response to the rapidly growing organic beauty and personal-care industry, one that now accounts for roughly 15 percent of the personal-care market.

“Along with many of the founding members of Oasis I have had been working for the past 10 years to certify organic products in this fragmented market,“ says Tim Kapsner, a founding member of OASIS and senior research scientist for Aveda, in a press release. “Until today, the U.S. has not had a dedicated organic standard for the beauty and personal care industry."

In absence of a true industry standard, Kapsner notes, companies started applying the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Organic food standards for beauty and personal-care ingredients and products—standards that were never designed for the industry in the first place. "Its strict guidelines limit even certain types of 'green chemistry' and pose significant challenges for those seeking to create certified organic products,” Kapsner adds.

Across the pond, ECOCERT, the current prevailing European standard and certification, requires a minimum of 10 percent certified-organic content for products to make the cut. At launch time, OASIS will require 85 percent certified-organic content, which the organization expects to become more readily available as the industry continues to evolve.

Comments (2)

It's interesting that Aveda is listed as a founding member of OASIS considering the greenwashing they've been guilty of with their own products for the last ten or so years.

Being owned by Estee Lauder seems to be quite the conflict in this area, to me at least.

jump to top Angel Funk says:

Here's hoping they use better standards than the EWG - I became quite disillusioned with their Skin Deep project when it became clear that they don't have any kind of weighting system for their scores. The result is that the data comes off as somewhat hysterical, screaming at me that the soy lecithin in my organic shampoo or the vitamin E in my all-natural soap is DANGEROUS. It's sad, because their aim is a worthy one, and one that I totally agree with, but their execution leaves something to be desired.

I hope that this group can manage to establish a standard that the average consumer can use to make safer choices, without being unnecessarily alarmist or leaving loopholes for greenwashing.

(And I may as well wish for a pony while I'm at it, but hope springs eternal...)

jump to top Ankoku-jin says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads