most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Yoav Binyamini said: ""The target price of 20 to 25 thousand euros (US $27 - 34 thousand) puts the Will in the class of affordable electric vehicles" Why not 'Ta..." [read]

Robert McGibbon said: "It's more accurate to say that it runs on lemmons AND zinc. The zinc anode gets depleted. A non renewable resource so to speak...." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the major proposal on the table or in the platform is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is s..." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the major proposal on the table or in the platform is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is s..." [read]

barry said: "Flying seattle to galapagos dumps 12,000 pounds of greenhouse gases into our future...per person. There is no way anyone can do that level of clima..." [read]

EPA Doesn't Want To Know About Factory Farm Pollution

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 03.20.08
Business & Politics

2008-03-20_100548-Treehugger-sewage-waste.jpg

Some people think that EPA stands for Environmental Protection Agency; for the Bush Administration, it might be Evidence of Pollution is Annoying. Right now a factory farm has to report to federal, state and local officials when ammonia emissions exceed a hundred pounds per day, which in 2004 the EPA said could irritate the respiratory tract, eyes and mucus membranes for a few days. Hydrogen sulfide at that level could have the same but longer-lasting effects accompanied by memory problems, headaches and dizziness, and have to be reported as well.

But there are no limits or rules on this, so the EPA says that the reports create an unnecessary burden on the giant factory farms like the one in Oregon that puts out 15,500 pounds per day. Said a spokesman: "It is...consistent with the agency's goal to reduce reporting burden where there would likely be no federal, state or local emergency response to such release reports" Because we know the EPA is there to save paper and energy, don't we.

According to Erica Werner in the Associated Press:

There are no federal laws or regulations capping release of these substances from animal waste so EPA critics argue that the reporting requirements are the only way for communities to know what they're being exposed to.

"If the public doesn't know that the emissions in their area are hazardous to their health how are they going to find out unless the sources are required to report?" asked Bill Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies. Becker said the reports are used by some states to respond to local concerns about farm pollution.

Of course the cattle people disagree. "In the end what we're talking about here is not a hazardous substance," said spokeswoman Karen Batra. "It's not toxic sludge or a chemical spill. It's cow manure." ::Associated Press


Comments (3)

EPA

Environmental Protection Agency.
or
Environmental-polluters Protection Agency.

Check out " Why I quit Bush's EPA" by Eric Schaeffer

It is one more reason Americans should have gotten rid of Bush, and a reason to be ashamed.

jump to top John Taylor [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Pollution is not restricted to the cities. Farms have their share. Although not to a certain degree, they are contributors. It would be best to monitor them also.

jump to top Brian Yalung says:

Hasn't anyone told these farmers that they're flushing money down the toilet? Methane power?

jump to top Scott_T says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads