th comments
Emily said: "wow. that's impressive...." [read]

John Laumer said: "Editor's remark: Sierra Club spokesperson has supplied the following in response to a comment... -------------------- In answer..." [read]

Cybercat said: "@Joe I think they're going off the flat gas price, rather than before or after government and state taxes. I wouldn't mind seeing another ..." [read]

Cybercat said: "There isn't a percentage for how much is generated from feeding animals other animal by-products so all the assumptions made below are part on that..." [read]

BenSchiendelman said: "Live in cities, use the public transportation, buy fruits, vegetables and grain at the farmer's markets. Seems like a no-brainer to me. Gre..." [read]

Biogasoline: The Greener Alternative to Ethanol?

by Jeremy Elton Jacquot, Los Angeles on 03.28.08
Science & Technology

randy cortrightWhy bother with corn ethanol - heck, even cellulosic ethanol - when biogasoline will do in a pinch? Wisconsin-based Virent Energy Systems, whose liquid biofuel-powered hydrogen generator we covered a few years back, is collaborating with Royal Dutch Shell on a new venture to develop biogasoline, a hydrocarbon alternative that, unlike ethanol, could take advantage of the existing gas infrastructure.

This new project would be centered around Virent's innovative BioForming technology, which uses a solid-state catalyst to turn plant sugars into hydrocarbon molecules suitable for use in standard engines; biogasoline's main advantage would therefore be to eliminate the need for specialized infrastructure, blending technologies or new engine designs. To produce ethanol, plant sugars first have to be fermented and then distilled - a lengthier, costlier process.

Eric Apfelbach, the company's chief executive, told Cleantech's David Ehrlich that the BioForming technology would be able to "use whatever the cheapest, most available sugar stream is in that area . . . anything that's a carbohydrate that can be made soluble in water is a candidate feedstock." That would also encompass a wide range of non-food crops: corn stover, switch grass and wheat straw - just to name a few.

Moreover, Apfelbach stressed that Virent's biogasoline has a higher energy content that ethanol, and that it would deliver superior fuel efficiency. Virent's pilot plants are currently able to produce only a gallon of biogasoline a day; its engineers hope to demonstrate a commercial-size plant able to produce around 10,000 liters within the next few years. A quick perusal of the company's website didn't reveal much in terms of BioForming's emissions impact - as you'll recall, the ethanol production process has often been criticized for burning more fossil fuels than ethanol helps displace.

As with most similar technologies - other recent examples include Bay Area-based LS9 and Amyris - Virent's success will depend on the speed with which it can upscale the production process and bring its biogasoline to the mass market. While promising, Virent's technology still has a ways to go before it's ready for prime-time.

Via ::Cleantech: Virent's biogasoline gets Big Oil backing (blog), ::The Capital Times: Virent, Shell extend pact (newspaper)

See also: ::Virent Energy Systems: Liquid Biofuel Fed Hydrogen Generator, ::Lots Of Ethanol, And More on the Way

Comments (6)

Interesting technology, but I'm still not clear on what processing needs to happen to the feedstock before it can be used with the catalyst.

Based on their website it looks like they can only use simple sugars or starches, yet there doesn't appear to be a clear and easy process to extract these from plant cellulose- which we know from other technologies is a tough nut to crack affordably.

If we solve the feedstock issue (big if in my mind), then this could offer a rather nice way to supplement our gasoline use.

jump to top Tim McGee [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

This form of fuel sounds like a great alternative to traditional gasoline. If its cheaper then gasoline I'm all for it. I can't afford $3.00 a gallon anymore.

jump to top VTFootballGrad says:

Under the websites section for "Feedstock options" it mentions that it can work with cellulose. Looks interesting, I'll be keeping an eye out for more from TH

jump to top Kaj says:

here's hoping that it's viable.

I've been wanting this forever now...

jump to top dredgerie says:

We found an interesting article about the problems with Ethanol on ConsumerReports.org:

http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2008/03/ethanol-e85.html

"But there are some problems with increasing ethanol blends. Ethanol contains less energy than gasoline, so increasing the amount of ethanol in gasoline will likely result in lower fuel economy. Increasing standard fuel blends from zero to 10 percent ethanol, as is happening today, has little or no impact on fuel economy. In tests, the differences occur within the margin of error, about 0.5 percent. Further increasing ethanol levels to 20 percent reduces fuel economy between 1 and 3 percent, according to testing by the DOE and General Motors. Evaluations are underway to determine if E20 will burn effectively in today's engines without impacting reliability and longevity, and also assessing potential impact on fuel economy."

TheSUBWAY.com would like to invite readers to post their own views and ideas in TheSUBWAY.com's Investor Forum:

http://investor-forum.thesubway.com/

jump to top stockpromoter07 says:

Here is a full production biocrude refinery:

www.biocrude.us
www.sstp.us

The refinery produces biogasoline, biodiesel, biojetfuel, etc....68 different products have been refined from the biocrude oil. The biocrude has been named Vertroleum TM.

The biofuels are hydrocarbon based, not alchohol based.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads