most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Preserve said: "I'm on track with the used lunch box perspective. Why make more and more and more lunch boxes when there are already millions of perfectly good lu..." [read]

Willy Bio said: "Hey Raiyn, Good for you, you are in the tiny minority. My problem is with eco-happy-hippie-nitwits who think "oh, its metal, I can toss in..." [read]

yoshhash said: "I am not Jewish, and would barely consider myself "religious". I also hang dry 90% of the time, but I thought this article was great- I will certa..." [read]

Albert said: "Petro-dollar talking. Wise investments for when the oil flow will reduce or dry out. All these will ensure tourists and foreign exchange will keep ..." [read]

Raiyn said: "Willie, so easily upset. It just so happens that my local steel recycler accepts bike chains as does the county. The county magnetically sep..." [read]

Zero Landfilling: A First Step In Industrial Ecology

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 02.20.08
Business & Politics

subaru_production_line.jpg

Corporate goals to achieve "zero waste" or "zero accidents" are nothing new. What is new of late is the steady stream of corporate operating sites announcing that they are able to come very close, indeed, to reaching such goals.

It's not just the fruit of the latest management consulting fad, nor is it a numbers game. The zero waste goal is actually achievable, can save real money, year after year, and lightens the load for over-worked front line employees. Another driver is the Wal-Mart effect. 'If Wal-Mart can cut packaging waste X percent, so can we.'

With packaging in particular, it may be possible to generate a waste reduction ripple that goes all the way up the supply chain, so that suppliers at even the resource extraction level are pushed to become less wasteful.

In the best of outcomes, cardboard shifts to returnable, re-usable crates over the entire supply chain. In the least favorable outcome, the biggest downstream customers simply make their immediate suppliers own the waste disposal problem.

As with the recent report of a US Subaru plant that has hit the 99.8% recycle/reuse rate, there can be rather severe carbon footprint limits imposed by the global economy.

Subaru's giant assembly plant here is on track to produce 180,000 cars this year. Yet the automaker pledges that virtually none of the waste generated from its eye-popping output will wind up in a dump.

Copper-laden slag left over from welding is collected and shipped to Spain for recycling. Styrofoam forms encasing delicate engine parts are returned to Japan for the next round of deliveries. Even small protective plastic caps are collected in bins to be melted down to make something else.

The fact that 5% of the cited reduction comes from waste to energy conversion (a.k.a. incineration) also has its value limitations when carbon emissions become a top ranked metric.

The point is - and we're directing this at USA Today more than Subaru America - if you're going to call a company green, you have to tell us what the criteria are, what's on the scorecard. Solid waste and emission reductions are very different, yet very interdependent goals, which means a balanced scorecard is of the essence.
Via::USA Today, "It's waste not, want not at super green Subaru plant" Image credit::ibid

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads