th comments
TrollPatrol said: "@ Lloyd, Excellent post. One minor clarification the Conservative policy which includes "cutting greenhouse gas emissions by..." [read]

Matt said: "Thank you for attempting to sort out this issue that's getting really irritating. I have a couple of additional thoughts. Nuclear power is th..." [read]

ladylynnea said: "I thought that right away, also, that they weren't taking care of the bears properly. But it does state that they were trying to conserve water -- ..." [read]

scott said: "Hostile to Diesel? Bologna. I test drove the VW Passat TDI (diesel) the other day and the dealer said there is a 8 month waiting list for deliver..." [read]

said: "There are already patents on seeds, so I guess it's only logical that there will be deeds on rainwater... Coming Up: Quotas for oxygen per ..." [read]

If Green Tax Credits Go, Say Goodbye to 116,000 U.S. Jobs

by Michael Graham Richard, Gatineau, Canada on 02. 5.08
Business & Politics

Wind Turbines and Sun

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) and the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) hired Navigant Consulting to do a study about the impacts that a non-renewal of renewable energy tax credits by the U.S. Congress would have. Here's what they found: Over 116,000 U.S. jobs and nearly $19 billion in U.S. investment could be lost in just one year. Approximately 76,000 jobs are at risk in the wind industry, and approximately 40,000 in the solar industry. The states that could lose the most jobs include: Texas, Colorado, Illinois, Oregon, Minnesota, Washington, Iowa, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and California. The lion's share of these states would lose more than 1,000 jobs.

Here's a quote by Gregory Wetstone, Senior Director for Public and Government Affairs of the American Wind Energy Association:

This study confirms the huge economic stimulative impact of extending the tax credits for renewable energy. At risk are many thousands of construction jobs, operations and maintenance jobs, and a major shot in the arm for the ailing U.S. manufacturing sector. Shuttered facilities that once provided steel, railcars, trucks, submarines, and household appliances are now being converted to manufacture renewable energy components. Today, however, investors are holding back because of Congress's delay in extending renewable energy tax credits, undermining one of the brightest and fasting growing areas of the American economy.

We've said it often and we'll say it again, green technologies are an engine of economic growth, and unlike others, this one is sustainable and helps make the world a better place for the long-term.

There are many reasons to be against subsidies in general (more on this in a future post), but for now, as long as there is no plans to level the playing field by removing subsidies to fossil fuel industries, tax credits for renewable energy make some sense. If you live in the U.S., it is important to let your elected representatives know what you think.

:: New Study: Delay in Extending Renewable Energy Incentives Risks Loss of Over 116,000 American Jobs, ::Democrats push 'green' energy tax breaks

See also: ::Video: Past, Present and Future of the Solar Industry, ::Best Solar-Power Commercial Ever?, ::Windy Payback Time: Wind Turbines and their Life Cycle Impacts, ::Wind Energy Could Power All of Britain's Homes by 2020,

Comments (4)

This is one more example in the modern history when the opportunity cost is actually more valuable than the desired action.

jump to top Smelly Feet says:

While the world moves forward with renewable energy, the USA moves a step backwards, thank you oil lobbyists and current white house admin for pushing america back into time and making us as a nation less competitive!

-Deep Patel
www.gogreensolar.com

jump to top Deep Patel says:

at a time when you would think the government would be encouraging development, they act nothing is wrong. maybe the oil companies need additional subsidy. but that's our government react instead of act.

jump to top d says:

While I support the use of "green" power, the loss of jobs in the windmill and solar power industries are more of job displacements. The money that's spent on these comparatively inefficient methods of producing electricity will be freed up to spend on other things. What the article doesn't say is that while saying "goodbye" to 116,000 US jobs, the freed resources will be applied to other areas of the economy. Some of those resources may be used for planting trees, creating arborist jobs, or for discovering new food resources preparing for the coming cold spell.

jump to top Eric says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads