US Presidential Candidates' Environmental Records
by Greg Haegele, Sierra Club on 02.22.08
Our friends at the League of Conservation Voters (LCV) released their 2007 National Environmental Scorecard today, and it reveals some good and bad news. First of all, the 110th Congress demonstrated solid movement toward a clean energy future for our country, including passing the energy bill in December (which included higher fuel-efficiency standards).
We enjoyed looking at the scores of the presidential candidates. From the LCV news release:
"The presidential candidates' scores all suffered from the occupational hazard of absenteeism. Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.) missed four votes each in 2007, although both made a point of being on hand for the key vote that would have allowed a version of the energy bill to move forward that included a provision to repeal billions of dollars in tax breaks for big oil and put that money toward clean energy programs. Clinton’s score in 2007 was 73 percent (87 percent lifetime); Obama’s was 67 percent (86 percent lifetime).
"Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) scored 0 percent in 2007 (24 percent lifetime) due to missing all 15 votes scored, including the key vote on repealing tax giveaways to big oil – a measure that failed by only one vote."
Zero percent in 2007, Sen. McCain? Ouch. This is surprising for a senator who's said he's very much for fighting global warming. (Sierra Club Executive Director Carl Pope has blogged twice now on McCain's words and actions - read "John McCain Should be Ashamed" and "Is John McCain Really Unclear on the Concept."
The LCV Scorecard is for 2007, but Sen. McCain did not start out 2008 aiming for a high score either, what with his missing the expanded stimulus package vote two weeks ago, which would have included clean-energy incentives, and which lost by -- get this -- one vote. (we discussed that vote in our Feb. 7 post.
All very interesting from someone who claims the leadership mantle on climate change (See: Greenwire - by subscription only.)
Beyond the presidential candidates, the new LCV report gives scores to all members of Congress, and you should definitely check out the ratings of your own leaders. How'd they do? While you're at it, yes McCain missed the expanded stimulus package vote, but how did your senators vote? You can thank or spank them here, depending on the answer. But most importantly, find out where your decision-makers stand on the issue.
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- Sun, Nike, Starbucks and More Meet for Climate Action
- Near Future for Green Movement: Speed Bump or Precipice?
- BLM Issues New Rules for Oil Shale Development: Last Minute Bush Administration Environmental Trashing?
- Coal's Darkest Hour Comes Just Before EPAs New Dawn
wow
And McCain probably is/was the greenest of Republican candidates... a little disturbing if you ask me.
Not showing up for a critical vote was a key move. McCain needs the extreme right to show up at the polls in November to have any chance. That is Karl Rove's legacy. The poor bastard can not even admit believing in evolution (or gravity for that matter) without being accused of being a "liberal". Remember "education is liberal".
I want to point out that 99% of the time someone doesn't show up for a vote, that's because the bill was either passing or dead by such margins that it would make no difference. Keep that in mind.
Great Post, but even more interesting is the link to the League of Conservation Votes (LCV.org/scorecard). You can check out how representatives in your state voted.
I find it kind of ironic that this article bashes McCain yet right below it I see "JOHN MCCAIN FOR PRESIDENT, paid for my John McCain 2008"