th comments
PB said: "ugh, abrupt climate change is very disturbing. I may have to update the timeline on my blog for the sea level rise maps :http://climateatla..." [read]

Tahoe Valley Lines said: "Electric cars are an unsustainable attempt by large corporate entities to maintain productive use of plants & talent built for the fossil fuel era...." [read]

John Laumer said: "I had a tour of this in the 1960's and still find it memorable. FLW was a great experimenter not only in design but also in use of materials and i..." [read]

Mel said: "Does that meant that we have little control over the warming of the planet? I am confused...." [read]

frederick said: "Safari again..." [read]

Tar Sands: The Most Destructive Project on Earth

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 02.19.08
Science & Technology (alternative energy)

2008-02-18_150326-Treehugger-oilsands.jpg

Edward Burtynsky

Environmental Defence just released a new report on the Alberta Oil Sands, calling it the most destructive project on Earth. DeSmogblog gleaned some facts from it:

-Oil sands mining is licensed to use twice the amount of fresh water that the entire city of Calgary uses in a year.
-At least 90% of the fresh water used in the oil sands ends up in ends up in tailing ponds so toxic that propane cannons are used to keep ducks from landing.
-Processing the oil sands uses enough natural gas in a day to heat 3 million homes.
-The toxic tailing ponds are considered one of the largest human-made structures in the world. -The ponds span 50 square kilometers and can be seen from space.
-Producing a barrel of oil from the oil sands produces three times more greenhouse gas emissions than a barrel of conventional oil.

All to keep up the happy motoring! PDF of report here via ::DeSmogBlog

Comments (24)

Where can I get one of these "propane canons?"

jump to top Anonymous says:

US should not except this oil. Then they would have to build a pipe to the west coast slowing things down a bit. I've worked their and its just like Mad Max. The whole area smells like theres a paving crew working 24 hours a day. I'm never going back.

jump to top surfcam says:

Effing disgusting is all I can say. This is beyond silly. Its outright stupid. 3 barrels of pollution to make 1?

jump to top Chris says:

U.S. environmentalists (I consider myself one) should really be ashamed of how they've been out maneuvered. As a source of crude largely for the U.S. market this is far more of an environmental disaster than many of the projects environmentalists spend far more time fighting against.

Bush and Cheney are likely gloating over this victory.

jump to top RhapsodyInGlue [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

worse part is that the provincial government continues to approve project after project. I am sure that alberta will be nothing more than a toxic scar by the time the oil sands are done. Yes the province is rich now, but that money will run out and all that will be left is a wasteland. nice job conservative government.

jump to top alex says:

I have been following this project. It truel is a catch 22. We desperatedly need the oil in the US. It is actually the US demand that is fueling this project.

Without a doubt it makes the conventional oil look clean.

What a shame. A ancient forest and lifestyle of the once pristine North gone forever!

jump to top mtman says:

You guys do realize this is canada, not the US right? US bashing doesn't really fit here.

jump to top Anon says:

You guys do realize this is canada, not the US right? US bashing doesn't really fit here.

jump to top Anon says:

What is even scarier is living in this province where there is only now critical dialogue of the tar sands disaster - everyone relishes the boom, so there is little backlash when people are rolling in cash. We have ruined a pristine environment to secure energy for the US. So people can drive 8 blocks instead of walking. When our premier was in Washington recently he called the tar sands environmental record a MYTH. We're in the middle of an election and it isn't an election issue because the same party has been in power since the tar sands were first developed in the 70's. What to do? Tell your MP to tell Alberta to clean up their (our) act.

jump to top Mieka West says:

What is even scarier is living in this province where there is only now critical dialogue of the tar sands disaster - everyone relishes the boom, so there is little backlash when people are rolling in cash. We have ruined a pristine environment to secure energy for the US. So people can drive 8 blocks instead of walking. When our premier was in Washington recently he called the tar sands environmental record a MYTH. We're in the middle of an election and it isn't an election issue because the same party has been in power since the tar sands were first developed in the 70's. What to do? Tell your MP to tell Alberta to clean up their (our) act.

jump to top Mieka West says:

propane cannons, farmers use them to scare geese from pea fields.

http://www.aquaticeco.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/product.detail/iid/2656/cid/789

I have worked at the very project in the photo, that's Suncor. And Surfcam is right about Mad Max... although it reminds me more of Mordor.

Its a very depressing place to be, and most Canadians don't want this explosive expansion, its drawing a transient population that's taxing out infrastructure greatly. Even those that don't see the destruction are tired of the effects of the boom.

Greenpeace has also been very vocal about stopping expansion in the oil sands.

But, if it makes Bush and big oil happy, Harper and Stelmach will gladly sign away the rights our future.

jump to top Kelly Giz says:

It is really a stupid thing. We need to stop it.

jump to top stevenchen18 says:

I have an idea. Let's tell them to shut that down, and instead drill in ANWR. In the end, that would be far less environmentally destructive.

Preventing drilling in one place only outsources the pollution somewhere else.

jump to top Dan A says:

It's a dumb puppy that pees in his own milk.

jump to top Ugly American says:

I read a while back (mid-2007) that the companies involved in tar sands extraction were going to use two CANDU reactors for heat because natural gas prices were too high. As a proponent of nukes I still have to say that's a really stupid use of nuclear power!

Keep an eye on how the fossil fuel industry begins to account for reserves. I saw one instance of a change in oil reserve calculations that included tar sands and oil shale. Hey, forget Hubbert's Peak, we'll just change the definitions so anything we can turn into gasoline can be counted as oil.

jump to top OtherDoug says:

So when they've squeezed all the oil out of these sands, where's the next place they'll go drilling?

jump to top MY says:

It's easy to play the blame game on the tar sands but its really an Alberta problem. Other countries could help out by slowing the demand down. It's the similar to the drug problem. The demand for both commodities is never ending.

jump to top surfcam says:

It's easy to play the blame game on the tar sands but its really an Alberta problem. Other countries could help out by slowing the demand down. It's the similar to the drug problem. The demand for both commodities is never ending.

jump to top surfcam says:

This is not the U.S. People. It needs to be shut down! It is killing the earth!

jump to top Mason says:

this is why i ride a bike

jump to top Brandon says:

Oil sands are completely horrible. I'm glad these are finally getting reported on. Canada has most of them. They are extremely expensive to develop and create an insane amount of pollution. Check out the damage here: http://www.managedq.com/search.php?q=oil+sands

jump to top The Truth says:

The oil sands pump out lots of CO2 and have fairly toxic trailing ponds and use tons of water.

Having worked in the area, I dont find it much different than any large mine tho. The suncor site is about 20km long and 5 km wide. The forests in the area are not rain forests either. However the oil sands companies need to be required to replant the tree like logging companies.

One good thing about the oil sands is that they have economy of scale working for them. With increased tech I think they can reduce Co2 by large amounts. But these companies will need to be forced to do so.

jump to top Jay says:

If you like them or not, oilsands are very important to secure our energy. There are some problems, indeed. But they provide oil and (wellpaid) employment.

jump to top Jefke [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Vice Magazine has a great series on Toxic Alberta... Fort McMurray is a crazy town !!

http://www.vbs.tv/video.php?id=987199110

jump to top Bob Loblaw says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads