Reading Between the Labels
by Lloyd Alter, Toronto
on 02.13.08

Greenguard meets all the tests for a good green label. It is a true independent third-party certification and is recognized by LEED and just about everyone else, "helping customers choose healthy, low-emitting products and materials and demonstrating a commitment to the environment through better indoor air quality."
So we were surprised to see an ad for Owens Corning's pink fibreglass insulation saying that it had Greenguard certification. We thought it had a formaldehyde binder in it. So how did it get Greenguard?

It seems that rules for getting Greenguard certification don't assess relative levels of goodness, just whether it is better than the standard they set, which in this case is 1/10th the American workplace standard or the National Ambient Air Quality Standard set by the EPA. We at TreeHugger know how eager the American Government has been to tighten environmental standards over the past few years. Is that good enough?
Johns-Manville uses an acrylic binder and is completely formaldehyde free, as is Guradian insulation.

So clearly one cannot rely on a Greenguard label to pick the greenest insulation, no matter what they call themselves in their marketing. Formaldehyde free is better than low formaldehyde, and a rating system should recognize that, but doesn't.
So look behind the labels to the Material Safety Data Sheets, and if the company does not make them easy to find on their website then choose another manufacturer.
Learn more at ::Building Green
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- 5 Green Improvements That Will Add Value to Your Home
- Ed Begley, Jr. Tackles Eco-Friendly Privacy Fences, Inexpensive Hot Water Heaters, and More
- Recyclable Is Not Recycled: Why Recyclable is the Greenwashing-est Word Around
- Gorgeous Eco-Friendly Wrapping Paper Helps Art Students In Need
- Top Green Gift Giving Meta-Guidelines, For All Seasons
- Overwhelmed by Green Gift Advice? Shop Sustainably with 3 Simple Questions

































Comments ()




