most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Preserve said: "I'm on track with the used lunch box perspective. Why make more and more and more lunch boxes when there are already millions of perfectly good lu..." [read]

Willy Bio said: "Hey Raiyn, Good for you, you are in the tiny minority. My problem is with eco-happy-hippie-nitwits who think "oh, its metal, I can toss in..." [read]

yoshhash said: "I am not Jewish, and would barely consider myself "religious". I also hang dry 90% of the time, but I thought this article was great- I will certa..." [read]

Albert said: "Petro-dollar talking. Wise investments for when the oil flow will reduce or dry out. All these will ensure tourists and foreign exchange will keep ..." [read]

Raiyn said: "Willie, so easily upset. It just so happens that my local steel recycler accepts bike chains as does the county. The county magnetically sep..." [read]

Reading Online: Green or Not? It depends...

by Michael Graham Richard, Gatineau, Canada on 02.26.08
Travel & Nature

Cartoon of Newspaper cutting trees

Is reading online instead of on paper green? Well, according to research by Slate's Green Lantern (aka Brendan I. Koerner), it depends. It makes a difference what you compare to, but there are also many assumptions made by proponents of both sides that aren't always convincing. The situation isn't clear cut (no pun intended)...

You can read the whole thing over at Slate. We tend to agree with the pro-online side, not only because we're a website, but because computers are used for so much more than just reading newspapers and the environmental benefits of making information widely available and connecting like-minded people is vastly underestimated. In general, we also think that books are a better use of paper than newspapers since they have a much longer useful life. Cartoon: Slate

Comments (6)

This is too funny ... have we forgot about the additional uses for newspaper; parakeet cage flooring, washing windows streak free, swatting bugs, making paper mache, lining cabinets, lighting on fire to start a fireplace, and the list goes on.

But I get the point ... online may be greener than reading a newspaper, but it's far more difficult to recycle a computer than it is to recycle newspaper. The answer will come with a perpetual newspaper, with flexible displays loaded up with the daily news; and you just leave it in the sun to recharge.

jump to top Joe says:

But ePaper (or whatever) will also end up being recycled and replaced just like normal PCs, so it's not the perfect solution -- but it's probably better than both paper and a full PC.

Of course, ePaper also replaces lots of other papers, not just newspapers. Ffor me, it would replace printed lecture notes and most other paper from university, and it could replace most useful letters I receive. White business paper contains less recycled material than newspaper, and probably uses more bleach etc, so reducing consumption would be even better here.

jump to top Matt [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

I like the cartoon,kind of sponge bob like-but if you look at the huge energy drain of the Google and Yahoo typical server bank ma-by it is OK to print on a paper...............

jump to top Chris Hurst says:

Also remember that reading a newspaper or book does not require electricity! No matter how many 'page impressions' I view. Are we really saying that in the future we want to only do our reading with electricity? Seems like a step back.

Joe is right on recycling too. Maybe you should factor in the manufacture & disposal of the PC - each time you view a web page you have to add in a small percentage of the resources used to build that PC. You can smugly say that reading stuff online uses less energy, but if you bin the old computer every 2 years for fashion, that is a big footprint you're leaving.

jump to top MY says:

I think the best scenario would be small newspapers, with local pertainent information, ads that only cater to local business, and the paper could be 100% post-consumer recycled paper. People could then reuse it for the reasons listed by the first poster (Joe).

That would be much better than supporting a computer culture which has poor recycling adn requires more energy in manufacture.

jump to top Andy says:

Just to throw this one in people who keep coming up with new computer's need to come up with like a chip or something for those that like to upgrade all of the time and that would cut down on the computers being thrown away. Hey, it might even be cheaper.

Corinne

jump to top Corinne says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads