most popular:
Green Your TP



most popular: i MiEV to Launch Early


most popular:
The Micro Compact Home


th comments
Joby said: "That graphic is lame. Why is there the total million tons of carbon AND the state ranking? They're the same thing. Why is the per capita carbon ..." [read]

JimS said: "That bar labeled 'per capita carbon output' is almost certainly incorrect. It looks more like perhaps a number from 1 to 50 of the order. It doesn'..." [read]

thespyofcharles said: "Yeah, I agree with the previous comment. You can't just put in a snippet of "that shit sucks" without justifying it. Journalism 101. Very unprofess..." [read]

Bill Young said: "Go Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant! Vermont has NO utility operated fossil fuel electrical generation plants...." [read]

spaetzel said: "Wyoming gets its ranking in part because of all the coal power plants generating power for the rest of the country...." [read]

Box Wings And Backward Fans For Cleaner Skies

by April Streeter, Gothenburg, Sweden on 02. 6.08
Cars & Transportation

Box_Wing_Jet.jpg

While some of us try to wean ourselves from our jet addiction and the engineers at Reaction Engines work out the kinks of a hydrogen-fueled hypersonic jet designed to get passengers from Brussels to Sidney between breakfast and lunch, a German non-profit called Bauhaus Luftfahrt is working on the wacky-looking "box wing" aircraft above and other goodies to help cut air travel's carbon dioxide emissions 35 percent by 2035.

Bauhaus, which includes Germany's MTU Aero Engines, is proposing to get to that goal in three steps: employing geared turbofan technology in conventional jet engines for a 15 percent CO2 reduction; adding counter-rotating fans into these same engines (5 percent); and lastly, equipping the system with a waste-heat recuperating technology for another 15 percent. An added benefit MTU said, would be quieter planes. MTU is studying incorporating the new engine systems into new aircraft designs like the so-called box wing. Not to be outdone,

the European Research Commission has launched another initiative, called Clean Sky, that aims for even bigger goals - cutting noise of jets by half and CO2 and NOx emissions by 50 and 80 percent respectively by 2020. Clean Sky has 1.6 billion Euros in hand over the next six years to evaluate technologies, such as active wings that sense air flow and adapt to it, and have them out in the market by 2015.

One huge downside: developing and using more efficient, greener planes won't be of that much help overall if the world's fleet nearly doubles by 2020 and air travel's contribution to global CO2 levels goes from 3 to 5 percent by 2050. Via ::NyTeknik (Swedish and some English)

Comments (5)

"One huge downside: developing and using more efficient, greener planes won't be of that much help overall if the world's fleet nearly doubles by 2020 and air travel's contribution to global CO2 levels goes from 3 to 5 percent by 2050"

This statment seems wrong; If the world's fleet doubles, greener planes will be even more important than today.

jump to top Mark Pierce says:

Good luck reducing NOx emissions by that much....

jump to top GreenPlease says:

It's spelt Sydney.

jump to top Anonymous says:

I would be more concerned that cars and electric power generation will drive the price of fossil fuels up so dramatically in the next 10 years that air travel for the common man won't exist in 20.

jump to top Justin says:

Ideas like this are why Bauhaus Luftfahrt is 'non-profit'.
Leave the aviation design to aviation designers... not 'artists'.

jump to top Ednonymous says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads